Page 1 of 1
Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 1:48 pm
by Bomber
Hope we win the toss and bat.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 4:45 pm
by Bomber
Lost toss but already one pakistani out.
1/4 and Johnson takes the wicket.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 4:57 pm
by Bomber
2/7 - might be a good toss to have lost!
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:45 pm
by Broken Glass
Seven wickets for two runs... impressive (doing my bit in Hawkesy's absence)
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 7:50 pm
by Chumbawumba
Does your husband bowl?
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:39 pm
by Broken Glass
Please explain.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 9:49 pm
by Chumbawumba
Younis said it to johnson yesterday
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:13 am
by Bomber
Draw imminent, but test cricket can spring surprises, especially when Pakistan play
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:58 pm
by Bomber
Not looking good atm.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:30 pm
by Chumbawumba
Bomber wrote:Draw imminent, but test cricket can spring surprises, especially when Pakistan play
Can't see it being a draw
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:16 am
by Bomber
Nocturnal Me wrote:Bomber wrote:Draw imminent, but test cricket can spring surprises, especially when Pakistan play
Can't see it being a draw
Neither can I at the moment. Some poor cricket by us all round.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 7:03 pm
by Holier Than Thou
What do you have to do to avoid defeat?
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 9:14 am
by N5 1BH
Going by the lack of activity on this thread I'm guessing the Aussies didn't go so well in the first Test.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 10:00 am
by Fraggle Rock
I'm surprised B.Toomer hasn't put his two cents' worth in.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 12:41 pm
by Old Redback
N5 1BH wrote:Going by the lack of activity on this thread I'm guessing the Aussies didn't go so well in the first Test.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:06 pm
by Bomber
I created the thread and then commented how poor we were. So you cant include me in that! Plus all the poms seem to be banned at the moment, probably due to negativity, whingeing etc, so its probably why some of them are quiet too.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:36 pm
by Chumbawumba
Bomber wrote:I created the thread and then commented how poor we were. So you cant include me in that! Plus all the poms seem to be banned at the moment, probably due to negativity, whingeing etc, so its probably why some of them are quiet too.
I'm sure the poms will realise that it's VERY hard to get any result in UAE on extremely spin friendly wickets. Especially for australia who don't have a spinner out there, well not one that actually spins it.
Then again, so many aussie batsmen got out to balls that didn't actually spin.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:19 pm
by Bomber
Chumbawumba wrote:Bomber wrote:I created the thread and then commented how poor we were. So you cant include me in that! Plus all the poms seem to be banned at the moment, probably due to negativity, whingeing etc, so its probably why some of them are quiet too.
I'm sure the poms will realise that it's VERY hard to get any result in UAE on extremely spin friendly wickets. Especially for australia who don't have a spinner out there, well not one that actually spins it.
Then again, so many aussie batsmen got out to balls that didn't actually spin.
At least none of our spinners retired mid tournament.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:36 pm
by N5 1BH
well maybe they should have
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:44 am
by Bomber
I think our wicketkeeper needs to consider retirement. Never seen Haddin keep so poorly.
Hats off to Younus Khan, third ton on the trot, not done against Australia since Herb Sutcliffe in 1925!
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:14 am
by Chumbawumba
Bomber wrote:I think our wicketkeeper needs to consider retirement. Never seen Haddin keep so poorly.
Hats off to Younus Khan, third ton on the trot, not done against Australia since Herb Sutcliffe in 1925!
He's never been a gloveman, australia haven't had one since Healey
Actually, Edgbaston 2009 you had one.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:10 am
by Sotally Tober
When did Bodø become an expert on cricket?
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:28 am
by Chumbawumba
Sotally Tober wrote:When did Bodø become an expert on cricket?
When in rome...
Or just possibly, not EVERYONE is bodo on here
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:52 am
by Steve#4
Australia cant play on turning decks.... the only way we were going to do well
is if Pakistan players decided the money was better from the bookies.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:28 pm
by Mad_Max
rattling along @ 116/5
An innings and how many you say?
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 6:15 pm
by Mad_Max
A lead of 465 - why would you not declare and give yourself as much time as possible to bowl out the opposition?
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:05 am
by N5 1BH
Reckon it must be a good batting track if the Pakis can get 570 dec. and Misbah can get 50 in world record time then equal the record for the quickest 100, can't think why the Aussies are finding it too hard.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2014 9:13 am
by Bomber
N5 1BH wrote:Reckon it must be a good batting track if the Pakis can get 570 dec. and Misbah can get 50 in world record time then equal the record for the quickest 100, can't think why the Aussies are finding it too hard.
Lets face it, we've been outplayed in all facets of the game. Batting has been poor, fielding (and keeping) abysmal and bowling pedestrian at best. I think once the Pakistanis got on top early on, the Aussies were mentally shot.
I do wonder how things would have gone had we wont the toss and batted first though. On pitches like this, it makes a BIG difference.