Cricket - PAK v AUS
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- Broken Glass
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:47 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Seven wickets for two runs... impressive (doing my bit in Hawkesy's absence)
Beware code thirties
- Chumbawumba
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:16 am
- Broken Glass
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:47 am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Chumbawumba
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:16 am
- Chumbawumba
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:16 am
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Can't see it being a drawBomber wrote:Draw imminent, but test cricket can spring surprises, especially when Pakistan play
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Neither can I at the moment. Some poor cricket by us all round.Nocturnal Me wrote:Can't see it being a drawBomber wrote:Draw imminent, but test cricket can spring surprises, especially when Pakistan play
Ignore this signature
- Holier Than Thou
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:04 pm
- Fraggle Rock
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:05 am
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
N5 1BH wrote:Going by the lack of activity on this thread I'm guessing the Aussies didn't go so well in the first Test.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
I created the thread and then commented how poor we were. So you cant include me in that! Plus all the poms seem to be banned at the moment, probably due to negativity, whingeing etc, so its probably why some of them are quiet too.
Ignore this signature
- Chumbawumba
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:16 am
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Bomber wrote:I created the thread and then commented how poor we were. So you cant include me in that! Plus all the poms seem to be banned at the moment, probably due to negativity, whingeing etc, so its probably why some of them are quiet too.
I'm sure the poms will realise that it's VERY hard to get any result in UAE on extremely spin friendly wickets. Especially for australia who don't have a spinner out there, well not one that actually spins it.
Then again, so many aussie batsmen got out to balls that didn't actually spin.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
At least none of our spinners retired mid tournament.Chumbawumba wrote:Bomber wrote:I created the thread and then commented how poor we were. So you cant include me in that! Plus all the poms seem to be banned at the moment, probably due to negativity, whingeing etc, so its probably why some of them are quiet too.
I'm sure the poms will realise that it's VERY hard to get any result in UAE on extremely spin friendly wickets. Especially for australia who don't have a spinner out there, well not one that actually spins it.
Then again, so many aussie batsmen got out to balls that didn't actually spin.
Ignore this signature
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
I think our wicketkeeper needs to consider retirement. Never seen Haddin keep so poorly.
Hats off to Younus Khan, third ton on the trot, not done against Australia since Herb Sutcliffe in 1925!
Hats off to Younus Khan, third ton on the trot, not done against Australia since Herb Sutcliffe in 1925!
Ignore this signature
- Chumbawumba
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:16 am
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Bomber wrote:I think our wicketkeeper needs to consider retirement. Never seen Haddin keep so poorly.
Hats off to Younus Khan, third ton on the trot, not done against Australia since Herb Sutcliffe in 1925!
He's never been a gloveman, australia haven't had one since Healey
Actually, Edgbaston 2009 you had one.
- Sotally Tober
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 12:33 am
- Chumbawumba
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:16 am
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Sotally Tober wrote:When did Bodø become an expert on cricket?
When in rome...
Or just possibly, not EVERYONE is bodo on here
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Australia cant play on turning decks.... the only way we were going to do well
is if Pakistan players decided the money was better from the bookies.
is if Pakistan players decided the money was better from the bookies.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
rattling along @ 116/5
An innings and how many you say?
An innings and how many you say?
Now, if you're lucky, you could hack through your ankle in five minutes.
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
A lead of 465 - why would you not declare and give yourself as much time as possible to bowl out the opposition?
Now, if you're lucky, you could hack through your ankle in five minutes.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Reckon it must be a good batting track if the Pakis can get 570 dec. and Misbah can get 50 in world record time then equal the record for the quickest 100, can't think why the Aussies are finding it too hard.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Cricket - PAK v AUS
Lets face it, we've been outplayed in all facets of the game. Batting has been poor, fielding (and keeping) abysmal and bowling pedestrian at best. I think once the Pakistanis got on top early on, the Aussies were mentally shot.N5 1BH wrote:Reckon it must be a good batting track if the Pakis can get 570 dec. and Misbah can get 50 in world record time then equal the record for the quickest 100, can't think why the Aussies are finding it too hard.
I do wonder how things would have gone had we wont the toss and batted first though. On pitches like this, it makes a BIG difference.
Ignore this signature