FootballNews

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:34 am**

Team GB Lost in the womens water polo 16-3 to the MIGHTY AUSTRALIANS!!!!!!!!

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:40 pm**

It would appear that most Australians have also forgotten how to.

Likely to be the worst performance in the pool for 20 years.

This article just about sums up the arrogance of Australia at these Olympics

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/londo ... 6440264291

Just 48 hours later the Brits have 5 in the bag and Australia how many.............

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:37 pm**

The topic is about Water Polo...............and how PATHETIC the poms are in it

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:41 pm**

Major Tom wrote:It would appear that most Australians have also forgotten how to.

Likely to be the worst performance in the pool for 20 years.

This article just about sums up the arrogance of Australia at these Olympics

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/londo ... 6440264291

Just 48 hours later the Brits have 5 in the bag and Australia how many.............

funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;

16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze

I dont see team GB getting that close....

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:06 pm**

I believe it was an Australian newspaper that made the comparison not me.

Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.

(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:36 pm**

Major Tom wrote:I believe it was an Australian newspaper that made the comparison not me.

Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.

(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)

how are u?????

Posted: **Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:56 pm**

DAM wrote:
Major Tom wrote:I believe it was an Australian newspaper that made the comparison not me.

Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.

(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)

how are u?????

Remember, it pays to beware of imitations.

Posted: **Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:54 pm**

Major Tom wrote:(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)

I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:32 pm**

Major Tom wrote:
Major Tom wrote:(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?

i was informed that "Stitch this" was looking for me.......

so that would mean UR STITCH THIS?????

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:00 pm**

DAM wrote:
Major Tom wrote:
Major Tom wrote:(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?

i was informed that "Stitch this" was looking for me.......

so that would mean UR STITCH THIS?????

Are you saying you're shorter than your mate

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:53 pm**

Major Tom wrote:
DAM wrote:
Major Tom wrote:
I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?

i was informed that "Stitch this" was looking for me.......

so that would mean UR STITCH THIS?????

Are you saying you're shorter than your mate

no, im stating that ur "sticth this"!

nice deflection though

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:57 pm**

I can see why there is an improvement with the poms in swimming. The Aussie coaches have cottoned on, telling them, the quicker you swim, the quicker you can get out of the water! Working a treat I see.

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:58 pm**

Bomber wrote:I can see why there is an improvement with the poms in swimming. The Aussie coaches have cottoned on, telling them, the quicker you swim, the quicker you can get out of the water! Working a treat I see.

remember, other than Ennis, all the poms gold came from events where they were sitting on their assess........ no wonder the poms won

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:09 pm**

DAM wrote:no, im stating that ur "sticth this"!

nice deflection though

If you tried thinking logically for once, you'd realise I've already answered your question.

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:10 pm**

DAM wrote:

remember, other than Ennis, all the poms gold came from events where they were sitting on their assess........ no wonder the poms won

Incorrect.

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:35 pm**

What is cant?

Posted: **Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:07 pm**

Reg Deadman wrote:What is cant?

It's a noun... insincere, especially conventional expressions of enthusiasm for high ideals !
In many ways you might be mistaken for a cant !

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:27 am**

Reg Deadman wrote:What is cant?

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:59 am**

Major Tom wrote:
Reg Deadman wrote:What is cant?

That doesn't equate to much !

Posted: **Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:59 pm**

DAM wrote: funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;

16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze

I dont see team GB getting that close....

Humble pie must be tasting good.

18 - Gold

Posted: **Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:58 am**

I will refer to Hawkesys argument in the Wild West of 3 times the population so GB must end up with 3 times
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...

GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....

Posted: **Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:26 am**

Steve#6 wrote:I will refer to Hawkesys argument in the Wild West of 3 times the population so GB must end up with 3 times
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...

GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....

well said!

Posted: **Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:55 pm**

DAM wrote:

remember, other than Ennis, all the poms gold came from events where they were sitting on their assess........ no wonder the poms won

What events did australia get their golds in?

Peter Wilson
Greg Rutherford
Mo Farah (TWICE)
Andy Murray
Alistair Brownlee
Nicola Adams
Jade Jones
Luke Campbell
Anthony Joshua

All say HI!

Posted: **Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:56 pm**

DAM wrote:funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;

16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze

I dont see team GB getting that close....

CORRECT! We weren't even close to 16

Posted: **Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:06 pm**

God is an Englishman wrote:
DAM wrote:funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;

16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze

I dont see team GB getting that close....
CORRECT! We weren't even close to 16

Gold = 29, nearly double!

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:37 am**

Big G wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
DAM wrote:funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;

16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze

I dont see team GB getting that close....
CORRECT! We weren't even close to 16

Gold = 29, nearly double!

Think on this occassion silence would have been golden, at least until the final medal tally. Never under estimate the British spirit!

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 am**

Then again you're talking to a guy who's an Aussie when it suits him and shitalian when it doesn't.

Posted: **Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:05 am**

[quote="Steve#6"]I will refer to Hawkesys argument in the Wild West of 3 times the population so GB must end up with 3 times
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...

GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....[/quote]

Posted: **Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:13 pm**

2 months later and still they're bitter of the hiding they were handed

Posted: **Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:56 pm**

Redmum's Avatar wrote:Then again you're talking to a guy who's an Aussie when it suits him and shitalian when it doesn't.

oh the irony, how many usernames do u currently have
u

FootballNews

See, Poms CANT swim....

See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....

Re: See, Poms CANT swim....