See, Poms CANT swim....
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
See, Poms CANT swim....
Team GB Lost in the womens water polo 16-3 to the MIGHTY AUSTRALIANS!!!!!!!!
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
It would appear that most Australians have also forgotten how to.
Likely to be the worst performance in the pool for 20 years.
This article just about sums up the arrogance of Australia at these Olympics
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/londo ... 6440264291
Just 48 hours later the Brits have 5 in the bag and Australia how many.............
Likely to be the worst performance in the pool for 20 years.
This article just about sums up the arrogance of Australia at these Olympics
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/londo ... 6440264291
Just 48 hours later the Brits have 5 in the bag and Australia how many.............
Put your ray gun to my head
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
The topic is about Water Polo...............and how PATHETIC the poms are in it
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Major Tom wrote:It would appear that most Australians have also forgotten how to.
Likely to be the worst performance in the pool for 20 years.
This article just about sums up the arrogance of Australia at these Olympics
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/londo ... 6440264291
Just 48 hours later the Brits have 5 in the bag and Australia how many.............
funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;
16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze
I dont see team GB getting that close....
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
I believe it was an Australian newspaper that made the comparison not me.
Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.
(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.
(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
Put your ray gun to my head
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Major Tom wrote:I believe it was an Australian newspaper that made the comparison not me.
Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.
(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
how are u?????
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Remember, it pays to beware of imitations.DAM wrote:Major Tom wrote:I believe it was an Australian newspaper that made the comparison not me.
Logic and context are not your strong points, just as swimming is no longer Australia's.
(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
how are u?????
Put your ray gun to my head
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?Major Tom wrote:(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
Put your ray gun to my head
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Major Tom wrote:I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?Major Tom wrote:(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
i was informed that "Stitch this" was looking for me.......
so that would mean UR STITCH THIS?????
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Are you saying you're shorter than your mateDAM wrote:Major Tom wrote:I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?Major Tom wrote:(If you are at the BOSA game tomorrow, make sure you come and say hi)
i was informed that "Stitch this" was looking for me.......
so that would mean UR STITCH THIS?????
Put your ray gun to my head
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Major Tom wrote:Are you saying you're shorter than your mateDAM wrote:Major Tom wrote:
I note you couldn't be bothered turning up?
i was informed that "Stitch this" was looking for me.......
so that would mean UR STITCH THIS?????
no, im stating that ur "sticth this"!
nice deflection though
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
I can see why there is an improvement with the poms in swimming. The Aussie coaches have cottoned on, telling them, the quicker you swim, the quicker you can get out of the water! Working a treat I see.
Ignore this signature
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Bomber wrote:I can see why there is an improvement with the poms in swimming. The Aussie coaches have cottoned on, telling them, the quicker you swim, the quicker you can get out of the water! Working a treat I see.
remember, other than Ennis, all the poms gold came from events where they were sitting on their assess........ no wonder the poms won
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
If you tried thinking logically for once, you'd realise I've already answered your question.DAM wrote:no, im stating that ur "sticth this"!
nice deflection though
Put your ray gun to my head
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Incorrect.DAM wrote:
remember, other than Ennis, all the poms gold came from events where they were sitting on their assess........ no wonder the poms won
Put your ray gun to my head
- Reg Deadman
- Apprentice
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:23 pm
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
It's a noun... insincere, especially conventional expressions of enthusiasm for high ideals !Reg Deadman wrote:What is cant?
In many ways you might be mistaken for a cant !
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
That doesn't equate to much !Major Tom wrote:Reg Deadman wrote:What is cant?
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Humble pie must be tasting good.DAM wrote: funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;
16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze
I dont see team GB getting that close....
18 - Gold
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
I will refer to Hawkesys argument in the Wild West of 3 times the population so GB must end up with 3 times
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...
GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...
GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Steve#6 wrote:I will refer to Hawkesys argument in the Wild West of 3 times the population so GB must end up with 3 times
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...
GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....
well said!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
What events did australia get their golds in?DAM wrote:
remember, other than Ennis, all the poms gold came from events where they were sitting on their assess........ no wonder the poms won
Peter Wilson
Greg Rutherford
Mo Farah (TWICE)
Andy Murray
Alistair Brownlee
Nicola Adams
Jade Jones
Luke Campbell
Anthony Joshua
All say HI!
Last edited by God is an Englishman on Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
CORRECT! We weren't even close to 16DAM wrote:funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;
16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze
I dont see team GB getting that close....
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
God is an Englishman wrote:CORRECT! We weren't even close to 16DAM wrote:funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;
16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze
I dont see team GB getting that close....
Gold = 29, nearly double!
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:58 pm
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Think on this occassion silence would have been golden, at least until the final medal tally. Never under estimate the British spirit!Big G wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:CORRECT! We weren't even close to 16DAM wrote:funny u should compare the two countries, if my memory serves me right, in sydney 2000, Australia won;
16 - Gold
25 - Silver
17 - Bronze
I dont see team GB getting that close....
Gold = 29, nearly double!
- Redmum's Avatar
- Apprentice
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:35 pm
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Then again you're talking to a guy who's an Aussie when it suits him and shitalian when it doesn't.
Yes, they're real !!!
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
[quote="Steve#6"]I will refer to Hawkesys argument in the Wild West of 3 times the population so GB must end up with 3 times
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...
GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....[/quote]
the medal count of Oz in Sydney......Still plenty of time to go and will judge at the end...
GB even have 3 times the countries so it should be a shoe in....[/quote]
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: See, Poms CANT swim....
Redmum's Avatar wrote:Then again you're talking to a guy who's an Aussie when it suits him and shitalian when it doesn't.
oh the irony, how many usernames do u currently have
u