NZ vs England
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 1:13 pm
Didn't see that coming.
Geez even worse than their recent Ashes effort , maybe England thought it was a 20/20 game.Mr Red wrote: England all out for 58 in 20 overs
yep lucky the tail enders could bat a bit.PDog wrote:they were 9/27 too!
Apparently in England faced more deliveries in their last 20/20 game than in this innings. Scored a lot more too....ozzie owl wrote:Geez even worse than their recent Ashes effort , maybe England thought it was a 20/20 game.Mr Red wrote: England all out for 58 in 20 overs
More racism.Wayne Kerr wrote:Apparently in the 2nd innnings, the Kiwis used a tennis ball so as to not humiliate the poms
Most kiwis I know don't mind being called kiwis.God is an Englishman wrote:More racism.Wayne Kerr wrote:Apparently in the 2nd innnings, the Kiwis used a tennis ball so as to not humiliate the poms
I'd rather get smashed than cheat and still get smashed.
God is an Englishman wrote:More racism.Wayne Kerr wrote:Apparently in the 2nd innnings, the Kiwis used a tennis ball so as to not humiliate the poms
I'd rather get smashed than cheat and still get smashed.
At least we're not the laughing stock of world cricket.Wayne Kerr wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:More racism.Wayne Kerr wrote:Apparently in the 2nd innnings, the Kiwis used a tennis ball so as to not humiliate the poms
I'd rather get smashed than cheat and still get smashed.
Well you should be used to getting smashed lately......
A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.Wayne Kerr wrote:^^^^
I beg to differ, I can give you 58 reasons why
I guess England have been known to cheat since day 1God is an Englishman wrote:A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.Wayne Kerr wrote:^^^^
I beg to differ, I can give you 58 reasons why
Seems like a bit of an over the top exaggeration to meGod is an Englishman wrote:A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.Wayne Kerr wrote:^^^^
I beg to differ, I can give you 58 reasons why
Approved by the leadership group, what would you call it?Cooper wrote:Seems like a bit of an over the top exaggeration to meGod is an Englishman wrote:A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.Wayne Kerr wrote:^^^^
I beg to differ, I can give you 58 reasons why
3 people going off on their own is now the "Leadership Group"?God is an Englishman wrote:Approved by the leadership group, what would you call it?Cooper wrote:Seems like a bit of an over the top exaggeration to meGod is an Englishman wrote: A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.
As it always is.Cooper wrote:Seems like a bit of an over the top exaggeration to meGod is an Englishman wrote:A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.Wayne Kerr wrote:^^^^
I beg to differ, I can give you 58 reasons why
An incident of blatant cheating by 3 individuals. I wouldn't say there is a culture of cheating through the team.God is an Englishman wrote:Approved by the leadership group, what would you call it?Cooper wrote:Seems like a bit of an over the top exaggeration to meGod is an Englishman wrote:
A bad innings v a systematic culture of cheating.
Approved by the leadership group, I knew it wouldn't take long until you all started defending it.Cooper wrote:
An incident of blatant cheating by 3 individuals. I wouldn't say there is a culture of cheating through the team.