Small sided games 2011
Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins
Small sided games 2011
How's the U11 format going...especially re 'keepers:
from the Optus SSG 2011 handbook:
Under 8 – 11
Goalkeeper
The goalkeeper is allowed to handle the ball anywhere in the penalty area.
To restart play after a save or gathering the ball with their hands, the ball
must be thrown or rolled from the hands or played from the ground with
their feet, within 6 seconds. The goalkeeper is not allowed to kick or drop
kick the ball directly from their hands. Opponents must be at least 5m
outside the penalty area and cannot move inside the penalty area until the
ball is in play. The ball is in play once it moves out of the penalty area or
when the goalkeeper places the ball on the ground*.
An indirect free kick is awarded if the goalkeeper touches the ball with his
hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate.
* Goalkeeper Progression
The developmental progression of the game becoming “live”
when the goalkeeper places the ball on the ground provides the
necessary learning phase for players transitioning to the 11 v 11
format of football.
any feedback from coaches on it? the keeper rule certainly a major difference to the old rooball
from the Optus SSG 2011 handbook:
Under 8 – 11
Goalkeeper
The goalkeeper is allowed to handle the ball anywhere in the penalty area.
To restart play after a save or gathering the ball with their hands, the ball
must be thrown or rolled from the hands or played from the ground with
their feet, within 6 seconds. The goalkeeper is not allowed to kick or drop
kick the ball directly from their hands. Opponents must be at least 5m
outside the penalty area and cannot move inside the penalty area until the
ball is in play. The ball is in play once it moves out of the penalty area or
when the goalkeeper places the ball on the ground*.
An indirect free kick is awarded if the goalkeeper touches the ball with his
hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate.
* Goalkeeper Progression
The developmental progression of the game becoming “live”
when the goalkeeper places the ball on the ground provides the
necessary learning phase for players transitioning to the 11 v 11
format of football.
any feedback from coaches on it? the keeper rule certainly a major difference to the old rooball
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
An indirect free kick is awarded if the goalkeeper touches the ball with his
hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate.
could make it interesting at times
hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate.
could make it interesting at times
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
It is just the normal backpass rule, u11s will be fine with itBIG RED wrote:An indirect free kick is awarded if the goalkeeper touches the ball with his
hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate.
could make it interesting at times
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
I have the 2011 Handbook in front of me and both the new goalkeeping rules apply to age groups U8-11's inclusive
Also game times are as follows
U6/7-2 x15 min halves
U8/9-2 x 20 min halves
U1o/11- 2 x 25 min halves
Also game times are as follows
U6/7-2 x15 min halves
U8/9-2 x 20 min halves
U1o/11- 2 x 25 min halves
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
So previously gk's could pick up a back pass ?
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:41 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
Pitch & goal sizes for each age group please.
KYPROS-ELLAS-ENOSIS
EXO H TURKOI APO TIN KYPRO
EXO H TURKOI APO TIN KYPRO
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
I think soZeljko Jurin wrote:So previously gk's could pick up a back pass ?
Probably for the U8/9's I wouldnt have thought it necessary as it might be a bit much to take in for some kids and as a coach I wouldnt have too much of an issue if the opponents keeper picked it up from a "backpass"
You might find then that the children might be too frightened to pick the ball up full stop in fear of doing the wrong thing.
For the U10/11"s I think it is a good idea as they work towards the full scale format in U12's.
As long as game leaders are flexible and not stupid over it just to gain an advantage we should be ok
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
And from past experience, we both know that this won't happen in some places .....Ginger Pele wrote:Zeljko Jurin wrote:So previously gk's could pick up a back pass ?
As long as game leaders are flexible and not stupid over it just to gain an advantage we should be ok
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
PitchFilikis Eterias wrote:Pitch & goal sizes for each age group please.
U6/7-30m x 20m
U8/9-Length-Min 40m-Max 50m-----Width-Min-30m-Max-40m
U10/11-Length-Min-60m-Max-70m-----Width-Min-40m-Max-50m
Goal Sizes
U6/7-Width-1.5m-2.0m----Height-0.9m-1.0m
U8/9-Width-2.5m-3.0m-----Height-1.8m-2.0m
U10/11-Width-4.5m-5.0m-----Height-1.8m-2.0m
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
Exactly, I mean lets be honestZeljko Jurin wrote:And from past experience, we both know that this won't happen in some places .....Ginger Pele wrote:Zeljko Jurin wrote:So previously gk's could pick up a back pass ?
As long as game leaders are flexible and not stupid over it just to gain an advantage we should be ok
A poor 7 yr old keeper picks the ball up by mistake and the game leader says free kick
The Penalty area is only 5m long x 12m wide so the free kick gets taken so close to goal that when its taken the keeper may as well not be there as he will have to duck for cover or get his head knocked off.
Solution-If I was game leader say play on and then just have a chat with the child to let them know nicely that we cant pick the ball up next time.
If it happens again I would let the attacking team take there indirect free kick fro a distance deemed fair for a good strike at goal but also for the defending team to at least be given a chance i.e-safe for the keeper.
Just my opinion thats all
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
Commonsense, that's all it is, but Ginger we both know alot of parents don't have it ...
Sad but true
Sad but true
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


Re: Small sided games 2011
yeh I was thinking about the issues that could happen with the U8's and maybe 9s GK's (re understanding the rule) and maybe the issues with the ball being picked up in a small goal area - ie the free kick will be pretty close to the goal.Ginger Pele wrote:I think soZeljko Jurin wrote:So previously gk's could pick up a back pass ?
Probably for the U8/9's I wouldnt have thought it necessary as it might be a bit much to take in for some kids and as a coach I wouldnt have too much of an issue if the opponents keeper picked it up from a "backpass"
You might find then that the children might be too frightened to pick the ball up full stop in fear of doing the wrong thing.
For the U10/11"s I think it is a good idea as they work towards the full scale format in U12's.
As long as game leaders are flexible and not stupid over it just to gain an advantage we should be ok
oh and the common sense factor of parents, game leaders and coaches
I dont think it will be an issue to often in a season (luckily)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
What age group?Bomber wrote:Young Croydon boys looked awesome tonight.
PS - why is the SSG games 2009, 2010 topic still stickied? :?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60561
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Small sided games 2011
Not sure to be honest, was busy checking out some of the mothers.Ginger Pele wrote:What age group?Bomber wrote:Young Croydon boys looked awesome tonight.
PS - why is the SSG games 2009, 2010 topic still stickied? :?
Nah, a few lads had very good skills, well advanced for their age. Main thing is they ALL were having fun and were having a real go. The future of the club looks good!


Ignore this signature
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
Good stuff,look forward to playing against them again this yearBomber wrote:Not sure to be honest, was busy checking out some of the mothers.Ginger Pele wrote:What age group?Bomber wrote:Young Croydon boys looked awesome tonight.
PS - why is the SSG games 2009, 2010 topic still stickied? :?(Only kidding!!!)
Nah, a few lads had very good skills, well advanced for their age. Main thing is they ALL were having fun and were having a real go. The future of the club looks good!![]()
Re: Small sided games 2011
As I will probably get asked to be a game leader for u/11's this year, I have a couple of questions.
Some teams are instructing their gk's to place the ball on the ground and to kick back into play instead of rolling or throwing the ball back into play (not a goal kick situation). Do we say no to this or let it go?
Once the gk places the ball on the ground and steps back to take a run up, is the ball considered to be 'in play'? My thinking is that the gk has lost possesion of the ball and any opposition player is entitled to win back the ball for his/her team.
What are peoples thoughts?????
Some teams are instructing their gk's to place the ball on the ground and to kick back into play instead of rolling or throwing the ball back into play (not a goal kick situation). Do we say no to this or let it go?
Once the gk places the ball on the ground and steps back to take a run up, is the ball considered to be 'in play'? My thinking is that the gk has lost possesion of the ball and any opposition player is entitled to win back the ball for his/her team.
What are peoples thoughts?????
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
The keeper has a choice to either roll,throw or kick the ball off the ground.gramps wrote:As I will probably get asked to be a game leader for u/11's this year, I have a couple of questions.
Some teams are instructing their gk's to place the ball on the ground and to kick back into play instead of rolling or throwing the ball back into play (not a goal kick situation). Do we say no to this or let it go?
Once the gk places the ball on the ground and steps back to take a run up, is the ball considered to be 'in play'? My thinking is that the gk has lost possesion of the ball and any opposition player is entitled to win back the ball for his/her team.
What are peoples thoughts?????
He is not allowed to kick the ball out of his hands(AFL style)
If the keeper puts the ball on the ground to kick it then the ball is deemed "live" and the opposing team are allowed to challenge for the ball.
Doesnt apply to goal kicks obviously where the opposing team must retreat back 5 metres from the penalty box to give the defending team chance to resume play.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60561
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Small sided games 2011
Hey Zelk/Hos, whats with the late cancellation by Raiders for the SSG at Croydon tonight? Some of our little ones were very upset.
Even Cassio was disappointed as he was hoping to see some gutsy football (unlike recent AU training sessions)! 

Ignore this signature
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 4:46 pm
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
No idea bratko, what age group ???Bomber wrote:Hey Zelk/Hos, whats with the late cancellation by Raiders for the SSG at Croydon tonight? Some of our little ones were very upset.Even Cassio was disappointed as he was hoping to see some gutsy football (unlike recent AU training sessions)!
Was it a 'no show' or did we atleast let you guys know ?
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60561
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Small sided games 2011
Got the call 1 hour beforehand supposedly. They trained instead but really wanted to play. I'm sure they will get over it. Not entirely sure of age groups but was meant to be two of the teams.Zeljko Jurin wrote:No idea bratko, what age group ???Bomber wrote:Hey Zelk/Hos, whats with the late cancellation by Raiders for the SSG at Croydon tonight? Some of our little ones were very upset.Even Cassio was disappointed as he was hoping to see some gutsy football (unlike recent AU training sessions)!
Was it a 'no show' or did we atleast let you guys know ?
Ignore this signature
- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
Sorry kids......might fire up the rivalry to AU v MV proportions .... 

Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


Re: Small sided games 2011
Maybe they're forming their own breakaway LeagueBomber wrote:Hey Zelk/Hos, whats with the late cancellation by Raiders for the SSG at Croydon tonight? Some of our little ones were very upset.Even Cassio was disappointed as he was hoping to see some gutsy football (unlike recent AU training sessions)!

Some people tell me that we professional players are soccer slaves. Well, if this is slavery, give me a life sentence.
Bobby Charlton

Bobby Charlton

- Željko Jurin
- Team Manager
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm
Re: Small sided games 2011
Ssssshhhhh, don't tell anyone, even trying to get Para Hills in to do SSF, but that could take a miracle ....... 
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......


- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60561
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Small sided games 2011
I trust you lot will leave the flares at home!Zeljko Jurin wrote:Sorry kids......might fire up the rivalry to AU v MV proportions ....

Ignore this signature