gone with the wind

anfieldboy · Post by **anfieldboy** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:08 pm

adel city v campbelltown semi today at birkalla - not much mention yet of the windy conditions.

game definitely much closer than scores suggest, city owe two goals to the wind - scooping the ball and making it very very hard for the keeper.
as for the neutral ground?? felt very much like a city home game actually

well fought battle by the two sides - no federation linesmen was a bit disappointing, a few rough calls offside.

lets hope city gets brought back down to earth by metro next week in league - i wonder which player will have to make way for damian mori when cup final comes though ;)

corona · Post by **corona** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:16 pm

from people i have talked to said the adel city vs campbelltown u17 was a close game , campbelltown hit the crossbar at 1-1 and only for 5 minutes of madness adel city scored 3 goals . amazing result with two teams evenly matched.

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:22 pm

What are you suggesting??...surely not that Adelaide City had a few unfamiliar faces today are you?? They wouldn't do that would they??? Just ask Lesiuk...he'll put you straight. (not). Heard they had about 8 subs too. Adelaide City will win the Cup....South Adelaide seem to have a different Cup squad too...will need some long subs benches at Hindmarsh....for all the regulars who get kicked out during the "BIG" games.

corona · Post by **corona** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:27 pm

sc1 interesting you say that , but if the players are allowed to play , not much can be said unless you know something we dont know ?

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:29 pm

sc1 wrote: What are you suggesting??...surely not that Adelaide City had a few unfamiliar faces today are you?? They wouldn't do that would they??? Just ask Lesiuk...he'll put you straight. (not). Heard they had about 8 subs too. Adelaide City will win the Cup....South Adelaide seem to have a different Cup squad too...will need some long subs benches at Hindmarsh....for all the regulars who get kicked out during the "BIG" games.

Yeh we had 0 19's 0 23's and 0 Super League players bought down for the cup game and . . . our full 17's team.

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:39 pm

strikerzebra....was it the same team that played last week? You must have a massive squad if not?

Hollygirl · Post by **Hollygirl** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:34 pm

Some clubs make it a rule that all players play in their correct age group for cup rounds (I know South Adelaide do this) they are not playing outside of their age group just usually play up.

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:23 pm

sc1 wrote: strikerzebra....was it the same team that played last week? You must have a massive squad if not?

We have about 18 players it is a big squad.

Stav_14 · Post by **Stav_14** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:07 pm

Sounds like theres a few sorelosers here. We won fairly and nobody can face it. We didnt bring any players down or any players up that is our usual under 17 squad. 5-2 thats just the way the cookie crumble n you gota face it

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact