SUB OR INTERCHANGE

Keftetha1601 · Post by **Keftetha1601** » Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:33 pm

jt wondering if amateur league has subs or interchange

Missing Post Count · Post by **Missing Post Count** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:40 am

Subs.

In Perth the amatuers and reserves have subs. In the socials and masters it is now interchange.

Furburger · Post by **Furburger** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:08 am

BodÃ¸ Glimt wrote:Subs.

In Perth the amatuers and reserves have subs. In the socials and masters it is now interchange.

That's a good idea to have interchange for the oldies

nugget66 · Post by **nugget66** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:10 am

over 35s are interchange & think c team can be if both clubs agree???

Penalty11 · Post by **Penalty11** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:29 pm

nugget66 wrote:over 35s are interchange & think c team can be if both clubs agree???

I played in the 10th division a few years ago and I'm positive there are no Interchange players allowed in the Amateur League.Forget about the 2 clubs agreeing it's a no no!

Made in Australia · Post by **Made in Australia** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:16 pm

Penalty11 wrote:
nugget66 wrote:over 35s are interchange & think c team can be if both clubs agree???
I played in the 10th division a few years ago and I'm positive there are no Interchange players allowed in the Amateur League.Forget about the 2 clubs agreeing it's a no no!

If both teams agree to it then it is usually left to the ref to make a final decision. I have seen it in the over 35's & C' teams on Sunday's.
The Saturday league are less likely to agree to it. They think it's World Cup! Joking laaaaaaads!

Di Canio · Post by **Di Canio** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Penalty11 wrote:
nugget66 wrote:over 35s are interchange & think c team can be if both clubs agree???
I played in the 10th division a few years ago and I'm positive there are no Interchange players allowed in the Amateur League.Forget about the 2 clubs agreeing it's a no no!

All o/35 games definitely are interchange. I think it's a good idea.

nugget66 · Post by **nugget66** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:49 pm

I think it's a great idea for the over 35's but I'd hate to change to it full time it changes the game to much.

Di Canio · Post by **Di Canio** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:59 pm

nugget66 wrote:I think it's a great idea for the over 35's but I'd hate to change to it full time it changes the game to much.

The only change I can see it having on the game is the tempo being raised.
This would surely make the game more entertaining to watch. I'd be all for it being brought in throughout the amateur league.

nugget66 · Post by **nugget66** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:42 pm

I disagree Dicanio it would change the game completely, substitution is the only way to go!

Black Hawk · Post by **Black Hawk** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:59 am

B's and single team team leagues should be interchange

SquishedMidden · Post by **SquishedMidden** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 9:57 am

Interchange.....?? Guys like beckham would still be playing when they're 60..... Set pieces would be a farce, look at american football - takes 5 hours to play an hour game.....

Changes the simplicity of the game to much, hey i can see it being positive in the lower grades; especially when there's 17 guys wanting to get a run and it's not for sheep-stations, but realisticly, it opens a whole new can of worms.

grouse n' ice · Post by **grouse n' ice** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:23 am

Interchange would let you go off for a beer mid way through the half. Very civilised.

Nah, only joking. Interchange is for sausage-jockies.

Jairzinho · Post by **Jairzinho** » Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:16 pm

a limit of 2 or 3 interchanges per half would be interesting

TheWingBack · Post by **TheWingBack** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:32 am

I read something recently that Alex Ferguson would like to see an increase in the number of possible substitutions. So instead of 3 we could see 5 or 6. Now that would change the way the game is played and the need for bigger squads.

SquishedMidden · Post by **SquishedMidden** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:39 am

J5 wrote:I read something recently that Alex Ferguson would like to see an increase in the number of possible substitutions. So instead of 3 we could see 5 or 6. Now that would change the way the game is played and the need for bigger squads.

With a squad like that, of course he would....

What about some of the "not so well off" clubs?

TheWingBack · Post by **TheWingBack** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:43 am

Not arguing his position mate, but it would also affect clubs in SA too. Just think of it from coaching perspective. You could replace numerous players with "fresh" players, especially in the midfield and up front to keep the pace of game high. This would of course then mean that defenders would also need to be subbed if fresh and fast forwards come on and start out running them. It could also increase the liklihood of more goals being scored in a game.

Besides it's all conjecture and interesting theory of the affect at the moment.