Friday night games

sparts · Post by **sparts** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:22 pm

para hills 15A defeated Adelaide city 5-0.
para hills 17's were 1 nil down to metros when i left

BocaChiefs · Post by **BocaChiefs** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:23 pm

U16's
Adelaide City 1-0 Blue Eagles

rabbit · Post by **rabbit** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:07 pm

Under 17's....Para 0 Metro 2. Poor game but Metro too good on the night.

pulse · Post by **pulse** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:16 pm

Blue Eagles vs Adel City

Good game overall, I thought it was going to be a stale mate the way each team squandered there chances. None the less City prevailed with a goal caused by a lack of concentration by the Blue Eagles defence. I noticed an under 17's player who was dropped for this particular game, it's alright if hes eligible but just to win a game come on thats abit unfair to the actual players who are in the squad. City are now undefeated and look to have put the final nail in the coffin for all other teams trying to win the 16's league.

LUFC_#9 · Post by **LUFC_#9** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 6:26 pm

pulse wrote:Blue Eagles vs Adel City

Good game overall, I thought it was going to be a stale mate the way each team squandered there chances. None the less City prevailed with a goal caused by a lack of concentration by the Blue Eagles defence. I noticed an under 17's player who was dropped for this particular game, it's alright if hes eligible but just to win a game come on thats abit unfair to the actual players who are in the squad. City are now undefeated and look to have put the final nail in the coffin for all other teams trying to win the 16's league.

yea i also noticed some older age group players in blue eagles squad such as the guy who wasnt even wearing the same shirt, lol!

pulse · Post by **pulse** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:10 pm

leeds4eva wrote:
pulse wrote:Blue Eagles vs Adel City

Good game overall, I thought it was going to be a stale mate the way each team squandered there chances. None the less City prevailed with a goal caused by a lack of concentration by the Blue Eagles defence. I noticed an under 17's player who was dropped for this particular game, it's alright if hes eligible but just to win a game come on thats abit unfair to the actual players who are in the squad. City are now undefeated and look to have put the final nail in the coffin for all other teams trying to win the 16's league.
yea i also noticed some older age group players in blue eagles squad such as the guy who wasnt even wearing the same shirt, lol!

Nah the kid who was wearing the other shirt was an actual player for that squad. But I don't know why he was wearing a different shirt.

LUFC_#9 · Post by **LUFC_#9** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:00 pm

i heard from someone he was actually from 19s seeing he was wearing that shirt?

Barney Rubble · Post by **Barney Rubble** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:00 pm

Here we go again,
same topic of dropping players down for the important games.

Why doesn't someone complain about the players that play UP as part of their natural developement

, now that woud surley be more positive than the inuendos about bringing players down . . .

rabbit · Post by **rabbit** » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:43 am

[quote="Barney Rubble"]Here we go again,
same topic of dropping players down for the important games.

If the topic is brought up so many times, then maybe, just maybe, someone at the FFSA may think it is important enough for discussion. No, nobody is breaking the rules as they currently stand but should the rules be changed. Firstly we need to understand if and why they should be changed. What are the real reasons Clubs need to bring players down? Positives Vs negatives...all that sort of stuff. Until that happens Barney....nothing will change and you'll hear the same old tune being sung....you know like the one you used to sing in the war days...."We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when"...etc, etc

sparts · Post by **sparts** » Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:16 pm

on fri night before the 15s game the city officials told the para officials that they had pulled a couple of players down to cover injuries, but still had 4 or 5 on the bench, more than para hills did...however it didnt affect the result...a 5 nil loss!

onimaster77 · Post by **onimaster77** » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:24 pm

leeds4eva wrote:i heard from someone he was actually from 19s seeing he was wearing that shirt?

no, he left his strip at home so a replacement was brought from the club