New Laws for 2012 season

[BPBC]

not everyone has 2 teams, try thinking before you type

and as he said, team update their kits generally every couple of years. So, the league just has to say by 2017 no teams will be allowed to wear black and from 2013 no team will be allowed to nominate a change of colour to black.

That gives you 5 years to buy your new kits.

I have no issue with that, its fair notice. I was merely pointing out to that idiot that its not as 'simple' as he stated.

[BPBC]

we have 4 teams actually, get ur facts right before u make a fool of urself.......

and nobody says ther reserves have to change or the lower teams....

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

[God is an Englishman]

we have 4 teams actually, get ur facts right before u make a fool of urself.......

and nobody says ther reserves have to change or the lower teams....

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

It won't actually cost you $5K though, surely at least some (probably all) of those kits would have to be updated through natural attrition anyway. Give you enough notice and update the "chain" at a kit a year. SIMPLE! and not costing you a cent.

[blackout]

we have 4 teams actually, get ur facts right before u make a fool of urself.......

and nobody says ther reserves have to change or the lower teams....

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

It won't actually cost you $5K though, surely at least some (probably all) of those kits would have to be updated through natural attrition anyway. Give you enough notice and update the "chain" at a kit a year. SIMPLE! and not costing you a cent.

Cool. I officially give refs notice that they have to change to pink tops by the year 2016. Natural attrition should make it easy.

[lisbon lion]

by the year 1016 hmmmmm

[blackout]

by the year 1016 hmmmmm

Oh well. It's in line with most of the stupidity on these forums.

[bapa]

we have 4 teams actually, get ur facts right before u make a fool of urself.......

and nobody says ther reserves have to change or the lower teams....

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

thanx for the insult, still doesnt dis-prove my theory of u updating ur kit!!!

oh well, keep playing in black until a Ref appears and tells u that u cant play in black. Then u can go crying and screaming like a little biatch............

some people are too hard stoopid.....

[bapa]

not only that but not all of those teams wear black anyway. Your div 4 side wears orange doesn't it.

oh really......so its only 4 team that need to change then....

[blackout]

Anyway, I don't want to have to change my forum username. That would be cruel and a different colour just wouldn't work.

[bapa]

Anyway, I don't want to have to change my forum username. That would be cruel and a different colour just wouldn't work.

why not pinkout??

[God is an Englishman]

Cool. I officially give refs notice that they have to change to pink tops by the year 2016. Natural attrition should make it easy.

try that and see what happens, the difference is games go ahead without you, but not without referees.

[blackout]

Cool. I officially give refs notice that they have to change to pink tops by the year 2016. Natural attrition should make it easy.

try that and see what happens, the difference is games go ahead without you, but not without referees.

I play reserves, so that doesn't bother me!

[God is an Englishman]

Cool. I officially give refs notice that they have to change to pink tops by the year 2016. Natural attrition should make it easy.

try that and see what happens, the difference is games go ahead without you, but not without referees.

I play reserves, so that doesn't bother me!

what if the other teams reserves ref is wearing black?

[BPBC]

we have 4 teams actually, get ur facts right before u make a fool of urself.......

and nobody says ther reserves have to change or the lower teams....

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

It won't actually cost you $5K though, surely at least some (probably all) of those kits would have to be updated through natural attrition anyway. Give you enough notice and update the "chain" at a kit a year. SIMPLE! and not costing you a cent.

Quote you
"New Laws for 2012 Season"

Quote you
"Referees will wear black, teams cannot"

Quote Marado

"simple, Refs wear balck - teams CANNOT!!!!"

You've since pulled out the 5 year rule, which i assume is just an assumption? natural attrition does not apply to this year.

[BPBC]

we have 4 teams actually, get ur facts right before u make a fool of urself.......

and nobody says ther reserves have to change or the lower teams....

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

thanx for the insult, still doesnt dis-prove my theory of u updating ur kit!!!

oh well, keep playing in black until a Ref appears and tells u that u cant play in black. Then u can go crying and screaming like a little biatch............

some people are too hard stoopid.....

Thanks for clarifying

[God is an Englishman]

Quote you
"New Laws for 2012 Season"

Quote you
"Referees will wear black, teams cannot"

Quote Marado

"simple, Refs wear balck - teams CANNOT!!!!"

You've since pulled out the 5 year rule, which i assume is just an assumption? natural attrition does not apply to this year.

I am not responsible for what other people write.

[BlackBrian_7]

Quote you
"New Laws for 2012 Season"

Quote you
"Referees will wear black, teams cannot"

Quote Marado

"simple, Refs wear balck - teams CANNOT!!!!"

You've since pulled out the 5 year rule, which i assume is just an assumption? natural attrition does not apply to this year.

I am not responsible for what other people write.

You say that but all I hear is weasel, weasel, weasel.

This is why I don't bet with you.

[BlackBrian_7]

Funnily enough in the FIFA international played between Australia and Saudi Arabia last night the ref wore red as well as his assistants.

If it is a FIFA directive as you state (being the FIFA expert you are) then wouldn't they bring it in at the pinnacle of the game?

note the tense that I used. Since when has football in "asia" been the pinnacle?

So you don't classify the World Cup as the pinnacle?

[God is an Englishman]

Quote you
"New Laws for 2012 Season"

Quote you
"Referees will wear black, teams cannot"

Quote Marado

"simple, Refs wear balck - teams CANNOT!!!!"

You've since pulled out the 5 year rule, which i assume is just an assumption? natural attrition does not apply to this year.

I am not responsible for what other people write.

You say that but all I hear is weasel, weasel, weasel.

This is why I don't bet with you.

I offered you the bet many times, I offered the money to be held by a neutral party, I even offered you a bet that I was pretty sure I would lose but you're the one who went quiet on it as you know you would have had to buy me beer.

[BlackBrian_7]

again you prove your stupidity. I am telling you its not as 'simple' as you claim. IF every one of a clubs 2/3/4/5/6/7 or 8 teams wears black it will cost 5 grand or more. Its an example of what it may cost a club when a rule like this is bought in, get it?? Not just Uni, any club who wears black. Its not simple at all, it could be very costly and not all clubs may have that type of cash lying around

thanx for the insult, still doesnt dis-prove my theory of u updating ur kit!!!

oh well, keep playing in black until a Ref appears and tells u that u cant play in black. Then u can go crying and screaming like a little biatch............

some people are too hard stoopid.....

Thanks for clarifying

You couldn't make it up could you?

It's like Marado is hell bent on proving to the world that he is an imbecile.

[God is an Englishman]

You couldn't make it up could you?

It's like Marado is hell bent on proving to the world that he is an imbecile.

to be fair I think we've pretty much shown that it won't actually cost you an extra $5k and his point is valid. A ref tells you you cannot play in black and he refuses to change his black top. What are you going to do?

Presumably you would just do what you have done in the past when playing a team in yellow and change to your clash kit.

[blackout]

to be fair I think we've pretty much shown that it won't actually cost you an extra $5k and his point is valid.

erm. no we haven't. and no it isn't.

[God is an Englishman]

to be fair I think we've pretty much shown that it won't actually cost you an extra $5k and his point is valid.

erm. no we haven't. and no it isn't.

then you are very poor at maths then. As discussed if adl uni were given notice then they could use natural attrition to replace kits at their normal lifecycle, meaning it would cost you $0

[God is an Englishman]

Once again I have been told tonight that 2.5 years ago adelaide uni (and all clubs) were told that in the 2012 season the refs would only have one kit and it would be black. SAASRA have informed their refs that their is only one shirt they should be wearing to officiate and it's the black one.

So, once again I offer the bet.

I offer to put the money into a neutral's hands as well. One beer per statement, so 4 beers all up.

Blackout and bb7 - let's see if you're money goes where your mouth is.

[BlackBrian_7]

I believe it was all 4 that had to be correct, which you have now changed.

Again you are using a body that has no administrative rights in the running of the league as an authority on how the league is run.

You have said that this change will be enforced in 2012, now you have weasled out of that and gone to such theories as attrition.

You are applying an interpretation of the laws of the game that doesn't exist within the published FIFA version.

You are claiming a FIFA directive that doesn't exist (refs only to wear black).

To me you (finally) lost all credibility when you disputed that the world cup is the pinnacle of world football.

If I was to accept the bet you would more than likely weasel out of it (as is your way) by changing what is the definition of black, no you don't wear a black kit it is a white V with a black background etc.

I actually find a lot of what you write quite amusing and provocative so I am not going to take it personally that you have tried to call me out in such a public fashion and merely let everyone else judge the merits of your arguments on their own.

[God is an Englishman]

So the SAASRA have no authority over the laws of the game. Do you not get it, they control the laws of the game. SAASL merely control the competition rules.

The all 4 was never agreed, you admitted that yourself when you questioned if the bet was agreed.

I have offered you a beer on every statement, I have offered to put the money into neutral hands.

The attrition was a way to explain to you that this mythical $5K figure is irrelevant. My impeccable source tells me that adelaide uni were told 2.5 years ago.

I never said the world cup (as a whole) wasn't the pinnacle, I said that the asian first round of qualification isn't the pinnacle. I am informed that coloured shirts are allowed only for internationals and the top level of the sport and that only one country in the world apparantly has coloured shirts outside the top levels.


I still offer my bet!

[Wayne Rooney's Elbow]

BlackBrian_7 backing down.

[blackout]

The larger style shin pads must be worn.

Referees will wear black, teams cannot.

Home team will be reported if shorts clash.

Match will not go ahead is socks clash.

I like the idea of the beer per statement, but we aren't going to know for sure what refs are going to enforce until well into the season, when shorts and socks clash, and even then, some refs will let it slide and some will be hard ar$es.

Either way, they aren't going to enforce these in pre-season, are they?

Simple way to settle it, if one of us is able to provide a directive from the SAASRA or SAASL stating one or the other to be the case then they will have won the bet. I am even prepared to allow that level of proof to be in my court, if I cannot provide that document by then, then I will agree to have lost the best and pay up.

Bearing in mind I have effectively given up on the black kits argument, then you would already be owed one beer. Agreed?

Never agreed. You are obviously insider trading. It smelled funny as soon as you typed this. Well done at trying to get a free beer (or two), but I ain't that stoopid.

It would be like betting on the outcome of a footy match while watching a replay. My momma don't raise no fool.

I am quite proud I made it into your sig though.

[God is an Englishman]

Never agreed. You are obviously insider trading. It smelled funny as soon as you typed this. Well done at trying to get a free beer (or two), but I ain't that stoopid.

It would be like betting on the outcome of a footy match while watching a replay. My momma don't raise no fool.

I am quite proud I made it into your sig though.

then according to black brian you have weasled out of a bet.

Of course I had insider information, that's why I posted it to start with but it was you and your mate who told me I was talking shit.

It's good to be the King, it's good to be me! Proven right AGAIN!

[blackout]

Never agreed. You are obviously insider trading. It smelled funny as soon as you typed this. Well done at trying to get a free beer (or two), but I ain't that stoopid.

It would be like betting on the outcome of a footy match while watching a replay. My momma don't raise no fool.

I am quite proud I made it into your sig though.

then according to black brian you have weasled out of a bet.

Of course I had insider information, that's why I posted it to start with but it was you and your mate who told me I was talking cabernet.

It's good to be the King, it's good to be me! Proven right AGAIN!

God help us, I have fed the monster.

I still think you are talking "cabernet". Like I said, in reality, apart from Div 1 and maybe Div 2 sun, no-one is going to care about sock and short clashes, and I doubt this will be enforced.

...and the only shin guards i know of that come to within "1-2cm of the knees and ankles" are hockey shinguards.