Sat Div 3 - Thoughts, predictions etc

[Hawkesy]

BTW that megaphone gave everyone the s••ts!!

I think that was the aim of it

its a big game this week with us versing Monarchs... hopefully we can seal another 3 points and push towards another championship

as i said the bloke marking me seemed to get more the shits with it than I did. In fact his words were "I'm embaressed, that's my son I'll tell him to fucking shut up at half time".

All well and good winding up the opposition but seemed to wind your own team up more. Personally my mouth is big enough to not need to hide behind a megaphone anyway.

[Hawkesy]

Puma's club ref was the best we had all season. i doubt falcons ref had even attended the course.

at you thinking that attending the course means anything.

you know my opinion on the course, but their bloke was VERY poor.

[Right Back]

BTW that megaphone gave everyone the s••ts!!

I think that was the aim of it

its a big game this week with us versing Monarchs... hopefully we can seal another 3 points and push towards another championship

Yeah we're going to the Bridge this week (it's a f**ked up drive that one)

They dont look like the team of last year if the ladders anything to go by.

I'd ask you what you thought of them but your game got postponed

[guti]

The drive isn't too bad, the majority of it is freeway!

[Chelsea4thewin]

The drive isn't too bad, the majority of it is freeway!

well from fulham gardens its a fair drive

[Right Back]

The drive isn't too bad, the majority of it is freeway!

well from fulham gardens its a fair drive

Funnily enough, nobody in our squad lives anywhere near Fulham Gardens.

We're mainly either south of Marion or north/east of Norwood.

We got the ground at Fulham because we wanted a "central" location....

[Juvefan 08]

A's Pumas 4-3 Monarchs
B's Pumas 1-5 Monarchs

I must say Monarchs are a very sore bunch of losers!! they complain about everything they even had a "team meeting" during play. Also they have made a complaint about a death threat that was never ever said.

in other words it was an open and exciting game.

[Right Back]

A's: Murray Bridge 1 - 0 ACU Falcons
B's: Murray Bridge 2 - 3 ACU Falcons

2 good close games but ressies should have buried them once up 2 nil but complacencey kept Bridge in the game and they nearly snatched it in the death....

As for the A's, watch this space....

[Token]

A's Pumas 4-3 Monarchs
B's Pumas 1-5 Monarchs

I must say Monarchs are a very sore bunch of losers!! they complain about everything they even had a "team meeting" during play. Also they have made a complaint about a death threat that was never ever said.

in other words it was an open and exciting game.

Was it something you didn't hear or Puma's players "not hearing"? Death threats are serious and should be dealt with accordingly.

[Hawkesy]

A's Pumas 4-3 Monarchs
B's Pumas 1-5 Monarchs

I must say Monarchs are a very sore bunch of losers!! they complain about everything they even had a "team meeting" during play. Also they have made a complaint about a death threat that was never ever said.

in other words it was an open and exciting game.

Was it something you didn't hear or Puma's players "not hearing"? Death threats are serious and should be dealt with accordingly.

would you actually take a deat threat said on a football pitch seriously anyway. Are you still an old bill side?

[Token]

A's Pumas 4-3 Monarchs
B's Pumas 1-5 Monarchs

I must say Monarchs are a very sore bunch of losers!! they complain about everything they even had a "team meeting" during play. Also they have made a complaint about a death threat that was never ever said.

in other words it was an open and exciting game.

Was it something you didn't hear or Puma's players "not hearing"? Death threats are serious and should be dealt with accordingly.

would you actually take a deat threat said on a football pitch seriously anyway. Are you still an old bill side?

Depends on what is said especially given Juvefan 08 mentioned it was a heated game.

[Juvefan 08]

The Refferee said he didnt hear anything of the sort. I'm a involved with both teams at Pumas and I asked every player on the field at the time and they have all rejected the claim. Also the complaint came from a Monarchs B player who wasnt involved in the match... so its a difficult one.

I agree death threats are very uncalled for... but if one is using it as excuses well then I pity them.

[Hawkesy]

The Refferee said he didnt hear anything of the sort.

CASE CLOSED!
Whether it happend or not is irrelvant, everyone else is irrelvant and saasl will ignore.

[Token]

The Refferee said he didnt hear anything of the sort. I'm a involved with both teams at Pumas and I asked every player on the field at the time and they have all rejected the claim. Also the complaint came from a Monarchs B player who wasnt involved in the match... so its a difficult one.

I agree death threats are very uncalled for... but if one is using it as excuses well then I pity them.

I doubt nothing will come from it and it seems one said something that another interpreted it differently.

[Hawkesy]

The Refferee said he didnt hear anything of the sort. I'm a involved with both teams at Pumas and I asked every player on the field at the time and they have all rejected the claim. Also the complaint came from a Monarchs B player who wasnt involved in the match... so its a difficult one.

I agree death threats are very uncalled for... but if one is using it as excuses well then I pity them.

I doubt nothing will come from it and it seems one said something that another interpreted it differently.

why do you doubt that?


Without any independent witnesses (like the ref) then who are saasl supposed to believe?

[Token]

The Refferee said he didnt hear anything of the sort. I'm a involved with both teams at Pumas and I asked every player on the field at the time and they have all rejected the claim. Also the complaint came from a Monarchs B player who wasnt involved in the match... so its a difficult one.

I agree death threats are very uncalled for... but if one is using it as excuses well then I pity them.

I doubt nothing will come from it and it seems one said something that another interpreted it differently.

why do you doubt that?


Without any independent witnesses (like the ref) then who are saasl supposed to believe?

Juvefan08 has only mentioned the ref and Puma players....could have been a spectator that heard the comment.

[Hawkesy]

Without any independent witnesses (like the ref) then who are saasl supposed to believe?

Juvefan08 has only mentioned the ref and Puma players....could have been a spectator that heard the comment.

not too many independent witnesses in the amateur league. Even if their was, it wouldn't be too hard to discredit that person as saasl would have to believe they were truly independent.

[Token]

Without any independent witnesses (like the ref) then who are saasl supposed to believe?

Juvefan08 has only mentioned the ref and Puma players....could have been a spectator that heard the comment.

not too many independent witnesses in the amateur league. Even if their was, it wouldn't be too hard to discredit that person as saasl would have to believe they were truly independent.

Oh I agree having the spectator's word isn't as solid as a ref hence why I said doubt nothing will be made out of it but still if the threat was serious enough and spectator heard it you wouldn't dismiss it.

[Hawkesy]

Oh I agree having the spectator's word isn't as solid as a ref hence why I said doubt nothing will be made out of it but still if the threat was serious enough and spectator heard it you wouldn't dismiss it.

what do you expect saasl will do about it then? Any team can get a spectator to say they heard something.

My money is on absolutely nothing.

[Dad's Army]

It's not rocket science.

[Token]

Oh I agree having the spectator's word isn't as solid as a ref hence why I said doubt nothing will be made out of it but still if the threat was serious enough and spectator heard it you wouldn't dismiss it.

what do you expect saasl will do about it then? Any team can get a spectator to say they heard something.

My money is on absolutely nothing.

What if the spectator voluntarily spoke up? What if the spectator was actually involved with the team that made the threats? What if the club ref heard but said he didn't even though the ref was right there? Now you're bringing up hypothetical situations to win an argument and we can be here all day with it.

[Dad's Army]

Now you're bringing up hypothetical situations to win an argument and we can be here all day with it.

I think that's what you are doing.

[Hawkesy]

What if the spectator voluntarily spoke up? What if the spectator was actually involved with the team that made the threats? What if the club ref heard but said he didn't even though the ref was right there? Now you're bringing up hypothetical situations to win an argument and we can be here all day with it.

you're the one who started with the hypotheticals.

What do you expect saasl to do about it then?

[Token]

Now you're bringing up hypothetical situations to win an argument and we can be here all day with it.

I think that's what you are doing.

But now Hawkesy even more random hypothetical situations to win his argument. All I am stating is if a death threat is being made it should be dealt with in a serious matter and that everyone should be heard.

[Hawkesy]

Now you're bringing up hypothetical situations to win an argument and we can be here all day with it.

I think that's what you are doing.

But now Hawkesy even more random hypothetical situations to win his argument. All I am stating is if a death threat is being made it should be dealt with in a serious matter and that everyone should be heard.

So what do you expect saasl to do about it?

NO hypotheticals required, did the ref hear it? Did any independent witness hear it?

[Token]

So what do you expect saasl to do about it?

NO hypotheticals required, did the ref hear it? Did any independent witness hear it?

I never said I wanted the SAASL to take action. All I ever asked the whole story in regards the threat and Juvefan08 explained and hence my comment "I doubt nothing will come" as there wouldn't be any evidence to support it. Never did I state SAASL take action nor did I state it should.

[Hawkesy]

So what do you expect saasl to do about it?

NO hypotheticals required, did the ref hear it? Did any independent witness hear it?

I never said I wanted the SAASL to take action. All I ever asked the whole story in regards the threat and Juvefan08 explained and hence my comment "I doubt nothing will come" as there wouldn't be any evidence to support it. Never did I state SAASL take action nor did I state it should.

As you said "I doubt nothing will come", So if you doubt nothing will happen about, what do you think will happen about it?

So you think saasl will do something about an incident that you yourself state there is no evidence to support. :?

[Token]

So what do you expect saasl to do about it?

NO hypotheticals required, did the ref hear it? Did any independent witness hear it?

I never said I wanted the SAASL to take action. All I ever asked the whole story in regards the threat and Juvefan08 explained and hence my comment "I doubt nothing will come" as there wouldn't be any evidence to support it. Never did I state SAASL take action nor did I state it should.

As you said "I doubt nothing will come", So if you doubt nothing will happen about, what do you think will happen about it?

So you think saasl will do something about an incident that you yourself state there is no evidence to support. :?

If I think nothing will happen....happy now?

[Hawkesy]

If I think nothing will happen....happy now?

should have said that from the start.

[Token]

If I think nothing will happen....happy now?

should have said that from the start.

Glad that's been sorted.....onto the next argument