FootballNews

Another wasted review.........god luv 'em

The BBC wrote:Quite possibly the worst review I've ever seen. No hint of that ball coming close to missing, it was ripping out all three.

Stitch This wrote:Another wasted review.........god luv 'em

The BBC wrote:Quite possibly the worst review I've ever seen. No hint of that ball coming close to missing, it was ripping out all three.

I don't think've ever seen a Watson LBW that he doesn't review. I was screaming at the tv "GO ON REVIEW IT".

Just need Clarke out now and they'll be out of reviews

Watto or Rogers should have undone there shoe lace during Swannies over and then they may have gone to lunch at the end of the over, but that's not the aussie way

Rookie wrote:Watto or Rogers should have undone there shoe lace during Swannies over and then they may have gone to lunch at the end of the over, but that's not the aussie way

Stupid is, as stupid does Forrest.

Rodgers in the words of the Aussies 'that was gold

Not the aussie way. Hahaha!!!

England doing well here against australia/sri lanka/pakistan/England

This gets better and better

Technology not going our way...Rodgers & Hughs unlucky....Watson was selfish.

Watson very selfish, hard for an ump not to give a full bunger and Hughes was interesting. Definite sound and snicko and yet he reviewed straight away.....but decision rightfully stood

Ian_Wright wrote:Watson very selfish, hard for an ump not to give a full bunger and Hughes was interesting. Definite sound and snicko and yet he reviewed straight away.....but decision rightfully stood

No mark from hot spot, can't see how he was out after the review, snicko can't be used in a DRS, noise could have come from a bat handle creek.

Rodgers, shouldn't have been given by the umpire but the rub of the green usually goes with the team that is on top, same in any sport.

Smith and Clarke need a big partnership otherwise it is going to be very hard for us to get a result.

I actually thought there was a very small mark on hot spot. Bye bye smith.......

Ian_Wright wrote:I actually thought there was a very small mark on hot spot. Bye bye smith.......

Very grainy shot, not conclusive at all...Could make an argument either way but in the end is back in the rooms.

This side is rubbing off on me as I am getting to the stage were I give a fuck about this game as much as them.

God is an Englishman wrote:Lehman listening to the commentators does make me laugh.

It is rather odd.

One two eight - tut tut

Someone has to tell Watson to pull his head in about reviews.

That really was selfishness of the highest order. I would like to know what was said between him and Rodgers just before he decided to review....

That's watson 6th unsucessful review of an LBW decison

God is an Englishman wrote:That's watson 6th unsucessful review of an LBW decison

Hope he doesnt decide to take up umpiring when he's finished up. Perhaps he'll become an FFSA referee with his "eyes".

looks like england has this series in the bag

Looks like the aussies have been ROOTED

England winning and out pops Mr. Toomer, the weather is good over there now, no need to stay here any longer, off you go, close the door on the way out

It's only cricket.

Porcupine wrote:It's only cricket.

Wash your mouth out.....Unfortunately it seems our over paid top order thinks the same.

582 lead and still going. Haha!!

I assume double ton (or he gets out) for Root and then declare. You aren't going to chase this down

Where's Captain Obvious when you need him....

leaving the one that hits the stumps

Why not waste another review

Stitch This wrote:Why not waste another review

I was amazed Watson didn't review it

At this rate Root will have scored more runs in 1 knock than the entire aussies have in 2 innings. C'mon aussie c'mon c'mon. Oh for some competition!!!!