Was it a foul?

The forum is for discussion of club football outside Australia and national team football Please do not post any offensive or malicious comments.

Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins

Facts and Stats
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 17368
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:54 pm
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by Facts and Stats »

NOC

JK.....pot and kettle....
User avatar
The Kop
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 12355
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 6:43 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The Kop »

Giallorossi wrote:Suarez is a diver and hopefully the refs crack down on him soon!!!!

The FA should have banned him for diving to get Rodwell sent off cheating wanka!
Suarez is only guilty of going down easily which can be said for 99% of players.
Dives - he does not. I challenge anyone to provide evidence on the contrary.

The media circus to excuse United's poor performance, Rooney's indescretions has worked. Well done Ferguson, extraordinary politican and protector of men, lucky he wasn't alive in the 1920s, most of Europe would be eating Haggis.
Image
Nice One Cyril
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 19844
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by Nice One Cyril »

e-football wrote:NOC

JK.....pot and kettle....
Jurgen was a pioneer :lol:
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Facts and Stats
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 17368
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:54 pm
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by Facts and Stats »

In today's football, it's not so much diving but making the most of a foul.

If you are fouled a free kick/pen should be given. You shouldn't lose that advantage by using theatrics.

Blatant 'simulation' is the cancer in the game, and very few players are guilty of this, luckily.
User avatar
bapa
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 17837
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by bapa »

e-football wrote:In today's football, it's not so much diving but making the most of a foul.

If you are fouled a free kick/pen should be given. You shouldn't lose that advantage by using theatrics.

Blatant 'simulation' is the cancer in the game, and very few players are guilty of this, luckily.
e-football wrote:This article proves he is a liar or photo's were all alterd.

As in the other thread, no more from me on this.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... ridge.html

I thought u werent commenting anymore on this matter??
:wink:
Facts and Stats
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 17368
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:54 pm
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by Facts and Stats »

I was talking about football in general, not if it was a foul :wink:
User avatar
bapa
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 17837
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by bapa »

e-football wrote:I was talking about football in general, not if it was a foul :wink:
e-football wrote:In today's football, it's not so much diving but making the most of a foul.

If you are fouled a free kick/pen should be given. You shouldn't lose that advantage by using theatrics.

Blatant 'simulation' is the cancer in the game, and very few players are guilty of this, luckily.

So, the topic is about a foul, and u talk about diving and fouls???
how is that not relevant to this topic???
:wink:
User avatar
The one and only
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The one and only »

Chelsea4thewin wrote:
D.A.M wrote:i thought i was watching a serie a game, when i saw fat adams take a dive!

Seriously, if ANYONE claims that he DIDNT dive - I feel sorry for them.

In saying that, what was giggs thinking in the wall!!!


it wasnt even a nice strike from gerrard!
you would probably notice Gerrard saw the wall had fallen apart and didnt need a powerful shot to beat the keeper. It was a smart free kick
why did gerrard say in the post match interview that he miss hit the shot and was trying to get it over the wall
I speak nothing but the truth
User avatar
The one and only
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The one and only »

The Kop wrote:
Giallorossi wrote:Suarez is a diver and hopefully the refs crack down on him soon!!!!

The FA should have banned him for diving to get Rodwell sent off cheating wanka!
Suarez is only guilty of going down easily which can be said for 99% of players.
Dives - he does not. I challenge anyone to provide evidence on the contrary.

The media circus to excuse United's poor performance, Rooney's indescretions has worked. Well done Ferguson, extraordinary politican and protector of men, lucky he wasn't alive in the 1920s, most of Europe would be eating Haggis.
i take the challenge


http://vodpod.com/watch/15491510-jack-r ... atgoalscom

if this isnt a dive your full of it
I speak nothing but the truth
User avatar
The Kop
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 12355
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 6:43 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The Kop »

There's clearly contact on both feet!!! in slow mo it looks innocuous but at full speed you tell me that won't hurt or knock u down...come off it mate.


If this is the best you can find then god help us all....
Image
totsreds08
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 6686
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:25 pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by totsreds08 »

The one and only wrote:
The Kop wrote:
Giallorossi wrote:Suarez is a diver and hopefully the refs crack down on him soon!!!!

The FA should have banned him for diving to get Rodwell sent off cheating wanka!
Suarez is only guilty of going down easily which can be said for 99% of players.
Dives - he does not. I challenge anyone to provide evidence on the contrary.

The media circus to excuse United's poor performance, Rooney's indescretions has worked. Well done Ferguson, extraordinary politican and protector of men, lucky he wasn't alive in the 1920s, most of Europe would be eating Haggis.
i take the challenge


http://vodpod.com/watch/15491510-jack-r ... atgoalscom

if this isnt a dive your full of it
dive: falling over with no contact. how is that relevant? want to see a diver? go watch ronaldo when he was playing for man u.
Image
hero2zero
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:45 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by hero2zero »

The Kop wrote:I'm backing Suarez right of innocent until proven guilty. Evra proves it was a calculated mud sling by mentioning it on TV, then saying it's no big deal.

Funny how at the supposed corner where he was racially vilified "like 10 times" no one was within earshot....


Evra. The same guy who accused a Chelsea ground steward of calling him a "f*shiraz immigrant". Turns out the ground steward, himself an immigrant from Senegal called him "f*shiraz ignorant". Cleared by the fa.

Lipreading deaf united fans watching in 2006 accused Steve Finnan of abusing Evra. Evra went along with the claims, but they were cleared once again by the fa.

I think you will find Evra wasnt the one making that accusation.

"went along with the claims" - care to elaborate?

South Africa 2010, as captain he overthrows the national team and bullies gourcuff.

Evra is a proven trouble maker. If the claims are true, I expect Suarez to have the book thrown at him. If evra has cried wolf again Suarez should send in the lawyers.
BTAC
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7926
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by BTAC »

The one and only wrote:i take the challenge


http://vodpod.com/watch/15491510-jack-r ... atgoalscom

if this isnt a dive your full of it
Do you actually know what a dive is? :lol:
haywood djablowme wrote: I believe Arsenal have improved more than the Poo! (we are only 5 pts behind you)
Nice One Cyril
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 19844
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by Nice One Cyril »

TBH, very few players actually dive, with absolutely no contact at all. However, these are grown men not delicate flowers and they should be able to ride the slightest of touches.

I'd hate to see Suarez on a busy street, he's be on his backside every couple of yards when someone brushes past him.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
User avatar
The one and only
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The one and only »

If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
I speak nothing but the truth
BTAC
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7926
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by BTAC »

The one and only wrote:he dived I don't care what any of you say.
It's always good to have an intelligent debate.
haywood djablowme wrote: I believe Arsenal have improved more than the Poo! (we are only 5 pts behind you)
User avatar
The one and only
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The one and only »

BowTiesAreCool wrote:
The one and only wrote:he dived I don't care what any of you say.
It's always good to have an intelligent debate.
dude I don't know what your problem is hey but give it a rest. Back to the topic I'm not saying he is a bad player but he dives exactly the same with nani good player but also dives
I speak nothing but the truth
User avatar
The Kop
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 12355
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 6:43 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The Kop »

The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
just remember that the tackle didn't happen in super slo mo away from the tv screen.....if you think a knock on the ankle at that speed wouldn't even make u grimmace you'e lost it mate.
Image
User avatar
LFTWNG11
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7253
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:08 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by LFTWNG11 »

The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
OH OW... someone is throwing the their toys out of their pram :cry:

D.A.M, are you that much of a piece of shit bandwagoner? Comparing Adam making the most of a foul by Rio to "watching Serie A"? And you claim you follow Napoli and Italian Football?

You really are a fucking idiot. Why would you even say something like that against the football you were bought up on? Or are you in Manchester United mode? When do you switch to Napoli mode? When do you switch to AU mode? You are a fucking disgrace.
Image
BTAC
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7926
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by BTAC »

The one and only wrote:
BowTiesAreCool wrote:
The one and only wrote:he dived I don't care what any of you say.
It's always good to have an intelligent debate.
dude I don't know what your problem is hey but give it a rest. Back to the topic I'm not saying he is a bad player but he dives exactly the same with nani good player but also dives
I've got no problem. Just seems as though you've spat the dummy in this thread because nobody will back you up.
haywood djablowme wrote: I believe Arsenal have improved more than the Poo! (we are only 5 pts behind you)
totsreds08
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 6686
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:25 pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by totsreds08 »

The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
:lol: :lol: :lol: . There was clear contact between rodwell and suarez. Are you blind?
Image
Nice One Cyril
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 19844
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by Nice One Cyril »

totsreds08 wrote:
The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
:lol: :lol: :lol: . There was clear contact between rodwell and suarez. Are you blind?
That's the trouble with the big girls that play the game today, any contact is deemed to be a dive-worthy foul. I'm sure it used to be contact sport played by blokes.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
User avatar
bapa
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 17837
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:08 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by bapa »

LFTWNG11 wrote:
The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
OH OW... someone is throwing the their toys out of their pram :cry:

D.A.M, are you that much of a piece of shit bandwagoner? Comparing Adam making the most of a foul by Rio to "watching Serie A"? And you claim you follow Napoli and Italian Football?

You really are a fucking idiot. Why would you even say something like that against the football you were bought up on? Or are you in Manchester United mode? When do you switch to Napoli mode? When do you switch to AU mode? You are a fucking disgrace.

Just saw this now, my ORIGINAL COMMENT WAS SUPPOSED TO B IN BLUE TEXT
:clown:
User avatar
LFTWNG11
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7253
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:08 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by LFTWNG11 »

D.A.M wrote:
LFTWNG11 wrote:
The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
OH OW... someone is throwing the their toys out of their pram :cry:

D.A.M, are you that much of a piece of shit bandwagoner? Comparing Adam making the most of a foul by Rio to "watching Serie A"? And you claim you follow Napoli and Italian Football?

You really are a fucking idiot. Why would you even say something like that against the football you were bought up on? Or are you in Manchester United mode? When do you switch to Napoli mode? When do you switch to AU mode? You are a fucking disgrace.

Just saw this now, my ORIGINAL COMMENT WAS SUPPOSED TO B IN BLUE TEXT
:clown:
suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure it was.

Replace that Napoli logo with Manchester, you big fan boy you...

Also, on topic... LOL at Manchester supporters calling anyone else divers. Wayne Rooney took the biggest dive I have ever seen in world football to halt Assnal's long unbeaten league run, and I bet not one of you battered an eye lid back then.
Image
steve10
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 475
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:30 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by steve10 »

LFTWNG11 wrote: suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure it was.

Replace that Napoli logo with Manchester, you big fan boy you...

Also, on topic... LOL at Manchester supporters calling anyone else divers. Wayne Rooney took the biggest dive I have ever seen in world football to halt Assnal's long unbeaten league run, and I bet not one of you battered an eye lid back then.
QFT
User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by God is an Englishman »

As for the chelsea one _ Why is fucking immigrant even racist?

It doesn't target a particular race but MANY, including ones own race.

It's a statement of a fact, was evra more upset by fucking or immigrant.
Image
User avatar
The one and only
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The one and only »

The Kop wrote:
The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
just remember that the tackle didn't happen in super slo mo away from the tv screen.....if you think a knock on the ankle at that speed wouldn't even make u grimmace you'e lost it mate.
yeah what ever man you know it all right ? imo that was soft and he took a dive rolling around on the ground from nothing

and to BTAC im not spitting the dummy i dont care if any one backs me up or not in my views in the rodwell incident he dived you guys dont notice it is only liverpool supporters saying he didnt dive and making up all these stupid excuses oh any knock on the ankle would make you grimmace my ass
I speak nothing but the truth
BTAC
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7926
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by BTAC »

The one and only wrote: and to BTAC im not spitting the dummy i dont care if any one backs me up or not in my views in the rodwell incident he dived you guys dont notice it is only liverpool supporters saying he didnt dive and making up all these stupid excuses oh any knock on the ankle would make you grimmace my ass
he didnt dive i dont care what u say
haywood djablowme wrote: I believe Arsenal have improved more than the Poo! (we are only 5 pts behind you)
User avatar
The one and only
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The one and only »

BowTiesAreCool wrote:
The one and only wrote: and to BTAC im not spitting the dummy i dont care if any one backs me up or not in my views in the rodwell incident he dived you guys dont notice it is only liverpool supporters saying he didnt dive and making up all these stupid excuses oh any knock on the ankle would make you grimmace my ass
he didnt dive i dont care what u say
cool
I speak nothing but the truth
User avatar
The Kop
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 12355
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 6:43 am

Re: Was it a foul?

Post by The Kop »

The one and only wrote:
The Kop wrote:
The one and only wrote:If its not obvious you guys are just backing him cause he is a liverpool player I don't know what is. In the case from the rodwell tackle he dived I don't care what any of you say. And yeah kop I would say I wouldn't go down from that tackle
just remember that the tackle didn't happen in super slo mo away from the tv screen.....if you think a knock on the ankle at that speed wouldn't even make u grimmace you'e lost it mate.
yeah what ever man you know it all right ? imo that was soft and he took a dive rolling around on the ground from nothing

and to BTAC im not spitting the dummy i dont care if any one backs me up or not in my views in the rodwell incident he dived you guys dont notice it is only liverpool supporters saying he didnt dive and making up all these stupid excuses oh any knock on the ankle would make you grimmace my ass
This is proper twighlight zone stuff now. There's a wall it's white, it's clearly white so why are people wasting time and bandwidth trying to fool us it's black.

Image

There is undeniable contact. Rodwell clearly caught him on the ankle after the ball with the trailing leg and slid in with the knee. At speed, the ankle rolling from the force of Rodwell's knee will more than likely be painful. It's not unreasonable at all to hit the deck.

What was unreasonable was Atkinson's handling of the siutation. Considering he produced the card within 2 seconds, Suarez didn't even get a chance to be the conman he is by rolling around a dozen times, then bounce up and trott on. Lucas and Adam who were 10yards away didn't have a chance to demand a card - didn't need to.

But here's the kicker....faking an injury is a way of conning the ref to make the situation seem more serious than what it so as to infer the ref dish out a harsher penalty to the opponent, do we at least agree on that?
So why, after an instant red was produced did Suarez still call for the physio to come on and stay off the field for treatment. Seems a bit odd no? The end doesn't justify the means does it if there was no contact? Why call for treatment at all, you already have achieved the best possible outcome in the situation giftwrapped by Atkinson.
Image
Post Reply