that's why your opinion is useless nothing would make you go to a womens legae game by the way, do you know who owns wesfield some guy called frank, has a bit to do with the ffa & growing the game in ozprefly wrote:Your kidding yourself Jeda, its got nothing to do with football with Westfield. The girls got a makeover because it suited Westfields marketing angle not the sports, they want to be associated with women's football to get their name out there. If Mattel sponsored the league they would have them looking like Barbie dolls. Womens football in Australia should have its own identity not a different one given to them each time they get a new naming rights sponsor,and they say first impressions count well those posters are the first impressions. Your right they don't look like men playing but they don't look look the women playing either! You like it, I don't, I wont go to watch the games but it's got nothing to do with the posters I would rather watch the mens team and under 14s, 15s lads play. My daughter hasn't been swayed and she would be the "target" group. We can go around in circles here, some people like it some don't, ah! that's life.
cya
you stay away, while the game grows through marketing in a few months we'll compare attendance & tv viewing figures oh one last thing, what identity should the league find
cya