Cristiano Ronaldo vs Liverpool

Le King · Post by **Le King** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:44 am

who needs ronaldo when u got tevez

ronaldo was quit 2day, but thats the beauty about our team... we got wo many options!
shoulda been 2 nil, dunno how rooney missed it

Judge Judy · Post by **Judge Judy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:45 am

liverpool never looked like scoring in the first half, even though you had to efforts cleared off the line and one header from torres missing by a few centimetres while VDS was off having a cup of tea

did you even watch the game diegom?

the gerrard tackle was class

hero2zero · Post by **hero2zero** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:28 am

Bout the only thing he did! Talk about a player who never shows in big games and dives and cheats.
Look in your own back yard Livershite.

Cant remember last time Gerrard 'played' against ManUtd.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-hXYn2pA0

diegom · Post by **diegom** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:29 am

WGT wrote:liverpool never looked like scoring in the first half, even though you had to efforts cleared off the line and one header from torres missing by a few centimetres while VDS was off having a cup of tea

did you even watch the game diegom?

the gerrard tackle was class

Yeah but i was a bit tired, mate as I mentioned above, If it were NOT for our defensive freak ups, U GUYS NEVER LOOKED LIKE SCORING!

BillShankly · Post by **BillShankly** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:42 am

The one and only wrote:
BillShankly wrote:ronaldo was terrible, vanished without a trace, rooney was the same, lucky they scored a jammy goal.
your an absolute idiot if you think rooney was terrible your just a sore loser bro go back to worshiping your over paid striker torres

are you serious? how many free kicks did he give away?

and apart from missing the easiest chance in the match what did he actually do?

delfino_1936 · Post by **delfino_1936** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:49 am

Hawkesy wrote:
diegom wrote:1-0 to the manchester!
1-0 to the manchester!
There's only one team in manchester and they won 4-2. :?

And that's undeniable.

only 1 team sings that

1-0 TO THE ARSENAL

1-0 TO THE ARSENAL!!!!!!

Le King · Post by **Le King** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:55 am

ey boys! 1 nil...
who cares about ronaldo shanks, jst worry about ur own blokes tryin 2 score!
torres is class, but mascherano... geee wat a fuk head, lucky keane wasnt playin, woulda gone through him!!

HOW GOOD WAS OWEN HARGREAVES!!!

ohh and anderson killed gerrard gerrard!

Judge Judy · Post by **Judge Judy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:59 am

yeah gerrard went missing, but he was a lot more effective and involved than ronaldo was

gotta laugh at ronaldo, honestly, he was like kewell this morning, played brilliantly the last few weeks then completely absent (well, again at least kewell was involved, but he was diabolical whenever he got the ball)

MG&Son · Post by **MG&Son** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:30 pm

Hawkesy wrote:
diegom wrote:1-0 to the manchester!
1-0 to the manchester!
There's only one team in manchester and they won 4-2. :?

And that's undeniable.

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:48 pm

Mighty Ger & Son wrote:
Hawkesy wrote:
diegom wrote:1-0 to the manchester!
1-0 to the manchester!
There's only one team in manchester and they won 4-2. :?

And that's undeniable.

Instead of rolling eyes, try and explain to me why I'm wrong then.

MG&Son · Post by **MG&Son** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:50 pm

Hawkesy wrote:
Mighty Ger & Son wrote:
Hawkesy wrote:
diegom wrote:1-0 to the manchester!
1-0 to the manchester!
There's only one team in manchester and they won 4-2. :?

And that's undeniable.

Instead of rolling eyes, try and explain to me why I'm wrong then.

why dont you explain to me why there is only one team in manchester, and that team is city..

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:52 pm

Mighty Ger & Son wrote:why dont you explain to me why there is only one team in manchester, and that team is city..

It's quite simple really. There is only one professional team in manchester. name me another one and I'll gladly admit I'm wrong and apologise.

MG&Son · Post by **MG&Son** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:53 pm

Hawkesy wrote:
Mighty Ger & Son wrote:why dont you explain to me why there is only one team in manchester, and that team is city..
It's quite simple really. There is only one professional team in manchester. name me another one and I'll gladly admit I'm wrong and apologise.

manchester united AND manchester city. Both located in manchester, both proffesional teams.

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:58 pm

Mighty Ger & Son wrote:manchester united AND manchester city. Both located in manchester, both proffesional teams.

Yes, they're both proffessional teams but only one of them is based in manchester. A clue for you, it's not united.

MG&Son · Post by **MG&Son** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:01 pm

Hawkesy wrote:
Mighty Ger & Son wrote:manchester united AND manchester city. Both located in manchester, both proffesional teams.
Yes, they're both proffessional teams but only one of them is based in manchester. A clue for you, it's not united.

Your obviously talking about whos closer to the cbd, if so, then yes city are, but you can hardly say united are not in the manchester area.

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:11 pm

Mighty Ger & Son wrote:Your obviously talking about whos closer to the cbd, if so, then yes city are, but you can hardly say united are not in the manchester area.

I'm not talking about closer to the CBD at all.

Yes, man utd do play in the manchester area but not IN manchester.

City play in the City of Manchester
Utd play in the City of SALFORD!!

MG&Son · Post by **MG&Son** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:13 pm

even though they still are in the manchester area, i half stand corrected.

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:19 pm

Mighty Ger & Son wrote:even though they still are in the manchester area, i half stand corrected.

I never said they weren't in the manchester area. It was more a dig at the fans over here who refer to them as "manchester" without the united. totally disregarding the other Manchester.

It's a bit like singing:

"1-0 to the Glasgow"

Squizzy · Post by **Squizzy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:45 pm

Hawkesy wrote:
Mighty Ger & Son wrote:even though they still are in the manchester area, i half stand corrected.
I never said they weren't in the manchester area. It was more a dig at the fans over here who refer to them as "manchester" without the united. totally disregarding the other Manchester.

It's a bit like singing:

"1-0 to the Glasgow"

I have always been Man Utd fan, and if I refer to them (on the very odd occasion) as Manchester, I will only ever mean Utd. Mainly because City are crap and I hate them to the point of not even recognizing your point above and that (at least to me) is undisputed.

Le King · Post by **Le King** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:59 pm

Hawkesy wrote:
Mighty Ger & Son wrote:Your obviously talking about whos closer to the cbd, if so, then yes city are, but you can hardly say united are not in the manchester area.
I'm not talking about closer to the CBD at all.

Yes, man utd do play in the manchester area but not IN manchester.

City play in the City of Manchester
Utd play in the City of SALFORD!!

north melb play in brissie

diegom · Post by **diegom** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:12 pm

We ALL KNOW that the ONLY team worth talking about that play with the name manchester is MANCHESTER UNITED!

kthnx

The one and only · Post by **The one and only** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:35 pm

BillShankly wrote:
The one and only wrote:
BillShankly wrote:ronaldo was terrible, vanished without a trace, rooney was the same, lucky they scored a jammy goal.
your an absolute idiot if you think rooney was terrible your just a sore loser bro go back to worshiping your over paid striker torres
are you serious? how many free kicks did he give away?
and apart from missing the easiest chance in the match what did he actually do?

and not one of them should of been a free kick on crapagher any way

The one and only · Post by **The one and only** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:36 pm

WGT wrote:i was watching the game and thought 'shiraz, we're in trouble if they bring cronaldo on', but luckily SAF rested him otherwise we might've been in more trouble!

very cheeky of SAF to rest all his stars though, with ronaldo, rooney and giggs all getting the day off and you still snatched the win, jammiest cunts on the planet!

you have to be the biggest sore loser i have ever come across man

in the end man u won thats all there is to it accept defeat and move on

Le King · Post by **Le King** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:44 pm

BillShankly wrote:
The one and only wrote:
BillShankly wrote:ronaldo was terrible, vanished without a trace, rooney was the same, lucky they scored a jammy goal.
your an absolute idiot if you think rooney was terrible your just a sore loser bro go back to worshiping your over paid striker torres
are you serious? how many free kicks did he give away?

and apart from missing the easiest chance in the match what did he actually do?

set up tevez and celebrated the goal

btw rooney didn nuffin wrong with those frees, its jst carra is a soft cock

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:53 pm

Rigoni 10 wrote:only 1 team sings that

1-0 TO THE ARSENAL

1-0 TO THE ARSENAL!!!!!!

Lots of teams sing it, but if you want to be pride of singing pet shop boys songs then you keep going mate.

10 · Post by 10 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:05 pm

hero2zero wrote:Bout the only thing he did! Talk about a player who never shows in big games and dives and cheats.
Look in your own back yard Livershite.

Cant remember last time Gerrard 'played' against ManUtd.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-hXYn2pA0

please tell me you are not talking about gerrard? ... you fucking dipshit

West Ham FA Cup Final

Olympiakos Champions League

AC Milan Champions League Final

Edited.

pires7 · Post by **pires7** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:07 pm

10 wrote:
hero2zero wrote:Bout the only thing he did! Talk about a player who never shows in big games and dives and cheats.
Look in your own back yard Livershite.

Cant remember last time Gerrard 'played' against ManUtd.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-hXYn2pA0
please tell me you are not talking about gerrard? ... you fucking dipshit

West Ham FA Cup Final

Olympiakos Champions League

don't forget the Champions League final

Hawkesy · Post by **Hawkesy** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:08 pm

west ham and olymiakos :?

He said BIG games.

ComeOnYouBlues · Post by **ComeOnYouBlues** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:09 pm

10 wrote:
hero2zero wrote:Bout the only thing he did! Talk about a player who never shows in big games and dives and cheats.
Look in your own back yard Livershite.

Cant remember last time Gerrard 'played' against ManUtd.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-hXYn2pA0
please tell me you are not talking about gerrard? ... you fucking dipshit

West Ham FA Cup Final

Olympiakos Champions League

I agree 100% with that post. Gerrard is a passionate player and normally produces the goods in the big games, as shown in the goals above.
Hero2Zero Your an idiot, and this is coming from someone who doesn't even like Liverpool

10 · Post by 10 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:13 pm

Hawkesy wrote:west ham and olymiakos :?

He said BIG games.

fuck, my bad.

for a second there i thought scoring in the last minute of the FA Cup Final and scoring the winner to progress through the group stage of the CL was doing well in a BIG game.