FootballNews

MegaBonus wrote:edited for accuracy.....

God is an Englishman


Shows how good he is at cheating

If you think it was deliberate the. He isn't very good at cheating all all seeing as he got caught.

First it was Broad, Now Stokes.... The POMS just keep breeding these cheats!

predator wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:That Ben Stokes decision was a disgrace. Smith, Stars and the 3rd umpire should be ashamed of themselves.

Stokes is a cheat, the crowd are racist, and Morgan is a liar, and the umpires got it right, that's how i saw it, stokes reflexes are pretty good, here he is in action training before Thursday's game https://vine.co/v/eT7DrDHM21Q stokes knew exactly what he was doing and it wasn't to protect himself

True Stokes has now been labelled a cheat in a low class act by yet another unsporting australian captain. How are the crowd racist when the entire aussie team is anglo. Morgan as is his right asked his opposite captain smith to retract the appeal which the weasel failed to do. The field umpires who saw it in real time did get it right, they thought it was not out. The witless moron upstairs who only watched the replay in slow motion got it wrong

stokes reflexes are pretty good?? You must think he is superman… Okay you catch this fucker

bapa wrote:First it was Broad, Now Stokes.... The POMS just keep breeding these cheats!

Oh dear midget, you never learn

N5 1BH wrote: Morgan as is his right asked his opposite captain smith to retract the appeal which the weasel failed to do.

Of course the lying toad Morgan would have retracted the appeal, just like Collingwood did, oh sorry he didn't did he

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwIy4dRbCo8

predator wrote:

N5 1BH wrote: Morgan as is his right asked his opposite captain smith to retract the appeal which the weasel failed to do.

Of course the lying toad Morgan would have retracted the appeal, just like Collingwood did, oh sorry he didn't did he

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwIy4dRbCo8

You may not have realised this but Morgan and Collingwood are not the same person.

Why is Morgan a lying Toad?

God is an Englishman wrote:

bapa wrote:First it was Broad, Now Stokes.... The POMS just keep breeding these cheats!

Oh dear midget, you never learn

signs of a defeated man, resort to name calling....

Wow how long ago was Collingwood, a good 5 years. Anyway didn't he admit he was in the wrong and apologise unreservedly. Won't hold my breath waiting for the aussies to do the same though

bapa wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

bapa wrote:First it was Broad, Now Stokes.... The POMS just keep breeding these cheats!

Oh dear midget, you never learn

signs of a defeated man, resort to name calling....

Defeated - we won the series

God is an Englishman wrote:

bapa wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

Oh dear midget, you never learn

signs of a defeated man, resort to name calling....

Defeated - we won the series

And I won this argument....!

There was an argument, when did this happen?

From all reports and comments it seems Aussies think smith and Starc were right, the rest of world think he's a prick and stokes was not out.

God is an Englishman wrote:From all reports and comments it seems Aussies think smith and Starc were right, the rest of world think he's a prick and stokes was not out.

Is Atherton an Aussie now??


In his column for the Times, Atherton argued that Smith did “what any reasonable captain would have done in that situation: he let the umpires decide.”

“Just as Stuart Broad was entitled to stand his ground at Trent Bridge in the 2013 Ashes, so Smith was entitled to uphold the appeal against Ben Stokes in the second one-day international at Lord’s on Saturday,” Atherton wrote.

God is an Englishman wrote:From all reports and comments it seems Aussies think smith and Starc were right, the rest of world think he's a prick and stokes was not out.

The bloke you refer to as the "drug cheat" didn't think Smith was right. Mind you, he talks a lot of bollocks at the best of times, despite being one of the best to ever play the game.

Slinky_Pete wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:From all reports and comments it seems Aussies think smith and Starc were right, the rest of world think he's a prick and stokes was not out.

Is Atherton an Aussie now??


In his column for the Times, Atherton argued that Smith did “what any reasonable captain would have done in that situation: he let the umpires decide.”

“Just as Stuart Broad was entitled to stand his ground at Trent Bridge in the 2013 Ashes, so Smith was entitled to uphold the appeal against Ben Stokes in the second one-day international at Lord’s on Saturday,” Atherton wrote.

You lot will probably claim him, has he ever had a pint of Fosters?

My opinion as a cricket fan (and an Australian) - shouldn't have been out, really not within the spirit of the game. There's no way he did that deliberately in order to protect his wicket, more likely that he flinched given a ball was being pegged at him, understandably.

Most batsmen who edge balls to the slips don't do it intentionally either.

God is an Englishman wrote:

Slinky_Pete wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:From all reports and comments it seems Aussies think smith and Starc were right, the rest of world think he's a prick and stokes was not out.

Is Atherton an Aussie now??


In his column for the Times, Atherton argued that Smith did “what any reasonable captain would have done in that situation: he let the umpires decide.”

“Just as Stuart Broad was entitled to stand his ground at Trent Bridge in the 2013 Ashes, so Smith was entitled to uphold the appeal against Ben Stokes in the second one-day international at Lord’s on Saturday,” Atherton wrote.

You lot will probably claim him, has he ever had a pint of Fosters?

We won't. He's a former England captain. Any chance you could defer to his superior knowledge of the game?

Happy to stick with Vaughan, Bumble & Botham.

McCullum has also said the same.

Gillespie too seems to follow the current aussie line, no responsibility or accountability to the game for players or field umpires. No right or wrong, appeal for everything and send it all upstairs to some bloke in a dark room, let the replay sort it out. Forget about real life in real time, all about technicalities. Trouble is the video ump is quite often wrong too. Progress or the americanisation of cricket ?

Loved this erm.. justification from Glenn Maxwell too.

To all my English friends that aren't happy with the stokes dismissal, by your logic, I should be upset that England appealed for LBW against me. Both balls were hitting the stumps, both technically out according to the rules of the game, both of us should just get our limbs out of the way. End of story... 2 nil

My opinion he was out, first thing you do when a ball is coming at you and you fear getting hit is protect your face. His hand was no where near there.

If it was a defender doing the same in a goal scoring situation there would be no argument. End of.

N5 1BH wrote:Gillespie too seems to follow the current aussie line, no responsibility or accountability to the game for players or field umpires. No right or wrong, appeal for everything and send it all upstairs to some bloke in a dark room, let the replay sort it out. Forget about real life in real time, all about technicalities. Trouble is the video ump is quite often wrong too. Progress or the americanisation of cricket ?

Loved this erm.. justification from Glenn Maxwell too.

To all my English friends that aren't happy with the stokes dismissal, by your logic, I should be upset that England appealed for LBW against me. Both balls were hitting the stumps, both technically out according to the rules of the game, both of us should just get our limbs out of the way. End of story... 2 nil

Maybe someone should point out that you don't have to wilfully get your leg in the way for an LBW

Haha 2-0,

The one day series is like going to the wedding of a bird you've always fancied and pulling a fat bridesmaid.
Yeah you've got laid but you missed out on the prize you really wanted.

God is an Englishman wrote:

N5 1BH wrote:Gillespie too seems to follow the current aussie line, no responsibility or accountability to the game for players or field umpires. No right or wrong, appeal for everything and send it all upstairs to some bloke in a dark room, let the replay sort it out. Forget about real life in real time, all about technicalities. Trouble is the video ump is quite often wrong too. Progress or the americanisation of cricket ?

Loved this erm.. justification from Glenn Maxwell too.

To all my English friends that aren't happy with the stokes dismissal, by your logic, I should be upset that England appealed for LBW against me. Both balls were hitting the stumps, both technically out according to the rules of the game, both of us should just get our limbs out of the way. End of story... 2 nil

Maybe someone should point out that you don't have to wilfully get your leg in the way for an LBW

Haha 2-0,

The one day series is like going to the wedding of a bird you've always fancied and pulling a fat bridesmaid.
Yeah you've got laid but you missed out on the prize you really wanted.

So in other words... the story of ur life!

bapa wrote:So in other words... the story of ur life!

Sorry, I don't understand text speak - what's ur?

I can only assume you missed the O on our, in which case speak for yourself my midget friend.

God is an Englishman wrote:

bapa wrote:So in other words... the story of ur life!

Sorry, I don't understand anything!!.

Edited it for you

bapa wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

bapa wrote:So in other words... the story of ur life!

Sorry, I don't understand anything!!.

Edited it for you

Is that all you've got, changing what I've written. How very sad.

God is an Englishman wrote:
The one day series is like going to the wedding of a bird you've always fancied and pulling a fat bridesmaid.
Yeah you've got laid but you missed out on the prize you really wanted.

I can vouch for you with this story.

Slinky_Pete wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:
The one day series is like going to the wedding of a bird you've always fancied and pulling a fat bridesmaid.
Yeah you've got laid but you missed out on the prize you really wanted.

I can vouch for you with this story.

I hope Slinky Pete wasn't said bridesmaid.