Page 8 of 11

Re: One dayers

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:30 am
by PDog
God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
an absolute flogging...

Re: One dayers

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:31 am
by Delete Your Account
Dunno how Binny wasn't MoM... important innings in the context of the game.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:53 am
by God is an Englishman
Slinky_Pete wrote:Dunno how Binny wasn't MoM... important innings in the context of the game.

Someone got DOUBLE the amount of runs and another person got 5 times the amount of wickets.

Nice try though

Re: One dayers

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:41 pm
by swannsong
PDog wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
an absolute flogging...
I think Warner may have softened the Indians up for England :)

Re: One dayers

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:28 am
by God is an Englishman
swannsong wrote:
PDog wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
an absolute flogging...
I think Warner may have softened the Indians up for England :)
That midget couldn't soften up Joe Root.

Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits, Kohli walked off the pitch having a friendly chat with Bell at "lunch".

Re: One dayers

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:57 am
by Bomber
Softcox generally mix with their own

Re: One dayers

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:53 am
by Stitch This
Bomber wrote:Softcox generally mix with their own
KP looked pretty soft last night.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:59 am
by God is an Englishman
Stitch This wrote:
Bomber wrote:Softcox generally mix with their own
KP looked pretty soft last night.
Who's the leading run scorer in the BBL this year?

Re: One dayers

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:04 pm
by Stitch This
Pity he let it go to his head.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:22 pm
by God is an Englishman
Stitch This wrote:Pity he let it go to his head.
I'd take one bad innings in a game where they needed 12 an over for a home final and being the leading run scorer.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:01 am
by predator
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:06 pm
by God is an Englishman
predator wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No
Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:27 pm
by Delete Your Account
God is an Englishman wrote:
predator wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No
Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.
Hardly anyone does, that's why they put it on GEM

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 2:54 pm
by God is an Englishman
Slinky_Pete wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote: Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.
Hardly anyone does, that's why they put it on GEM

Yes, but he claims to be English

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:56 pm
by predator
God is an Englishman wrote:
predator wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
No
Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.
I watch multiple sports all at once, i can't have commentary going on all of them, and definitely don't want to hear comments regarding the mug on the right hand screen :lol: :lol: :lol:
Image

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:06 pm
by God is an Englishman
He's my favourite current England cricketer, a legend.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:01 pm
by God is an Englishman
Where's Moses Henriques from?

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:30 pm
by God is an Englishman
Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:35 pm
by Bomber
God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits............. :D

Re: One dayers

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 5:22 am
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits............. :D
I mention the great run chase what more do you want. It just pisses me off that the cons can't see what's in front of them. The game's about team not the individual but Bell was the clear MOM yesterday.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 3:23 pm
by Bomber
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.

Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits............. :D
I mention the great run chase what more do you want. It just pisses me off that the cons can't see what's in front of them. The game's about team not the individual but Bell was the clear MOM yesterday.
Player of the match doesnt always have to mean highest run scorer or wicket taker. I liken it more to who had most influence in the game.

Anyway, a reasonable hit out for our reserves

Re: One dayers

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 1:19 am
by God is an Englishman
I do agree, which is why in our first game it was clearly Morgan.

I would have understood Haddin more than the Sevenoaks vine reject in round 2

Re: One dayers

Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:14 pm
by Stitch This
Was there even a game on today?

Re: One dayers

Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:54 pm
by The Bourne Supremacy
Yes, but only one side turned up. Actually make it half a side.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:53 am
by God is an Englishman
The Bourne Supremacy wrote:Yes, but only one side turned up. Actually make it half a side.

Both sides had their bowlers turn up.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:06 am
by Bomber
So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?

Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match! :lol:

Re: One dayers

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:13 am
by Old Redback
Bomber wrote:So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?

Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match! :lol:
I think from recent history moaning about a sub fielder has been more of an Australian trait.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:15 am
by Bomber
Old Redback wrote:
Bomber wrote:So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?

Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match! :lol:
I think from recent history moaning about a sub fielder has been more of an Australian trait.
More recently its been a Hawkesy whinge.

Re: One dayers

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:23 am
by Black_Panther
Did Morgan really say that the POMs aren't afraid of Johnson anymore?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: One dayers

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:41 am
by Stitch This
God is an Englishman wrote:Both sides had their bowlers turn up.
James Faulkner wrote:hi