Re: One dayers
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:30 am
an absolute flogging...God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
an absolute flogging...God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
Slinky_Pete wrote:Dunno how Binny wasn't MoM... important innings in the context of the game.
I think Warner may have softened the Indians up for EnglandPDog wrote:an absolute flogging...God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
That midget couldn't soften up Joe Root.swannsong wrote:I think Warner may have softened the Indians up for EnglandPDog wrote:an absolute flogging...God is an Englishman wrote:What a win today, totally dominant performance.
KP looked pretty soft last night.Bomber wrote:Softcox generally mix with their own
Who's the leading run scorer in the BBL this year?Stitch This wrote:KP looked pretty soft last night.Bomber wrote:Softcox generally mix with their own
I'd take one bad innings in a game where they needed 12 an over for a home final and being the leading run scorer.Stitch This wrote:Pity he let it go to his head.
NoGod is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.predator wrote:NoGod is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
Hardly anyone does, that's why they put it on GEMGod is an Englishman wrote:Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.predator wrote:NoGod is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
Slinky_Pete wrote:Hardly anyone does, that's why they put it on GEMGod is an Englishman wrote: Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.
I watch multiple sports all at once, i can't have commentary going on all of them, and definitely don't want to hear comments regarding the mug on the right hand screenGod is an Englishman wrote:Didn't watch the game then as even the commentators made comments about it.predator wrote:NoGod is an Englishman wrote:
Anyone notice that England played India in good spirits
You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits.............God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.
Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
I mention the great run chase what more do you want. It just pisses me off that the cons can't see what's in front of them. The game's about team not the individual but Bell was the clear MOM yesterday.Bomber wrote:You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits.............God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.
Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
Player of the match doesnt always have to mean highest run scorer or wicket taker. I liken it more to who had most influence in the game.God is an Englishman wrote:I mention the great run chase what more do you want. It just pisses me off that the cons can't see what's in front of them. The game's about team not the individual but Bell was the clear MOM yesterday.Bomber wrote:You seem hell bent on MOM awards these days, rather than the result. I can refer you to a therapist if needed.............she's cheap......and comes with decent benefits.............God is an Englishman wrote:Even you lot are going to see my point when Bell doesn't get man of the match in this one.
Great run chase by the cons, those lean overs in the last 10 have cost us.
The Bourne Supremacy wrote:Yes, but only one side turned up. Actually make it half a side.
I think from recent history moaning about a sub fielder has been more of an Australian trait.Bomber wrote:So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?
Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match!
More recently its been a Hawkesy whinge.Old Redback wrote:I think from recent history moaning about a sub fielder has been more of an Australian trait.Bomber wrote:So what was it this time - umpiring? Warner talking too much? Sub fielder took too many catches?
Cant believe Woakes didn't get man of the match!
God is an Englishman wrote:Both sides had their bowlers turn up.
James Faulkner wrote:hi