1 4 4 3 formation

This forum is for the discussion of women's football, the fastest growing participation sport in Australia. This includes local women's football and the A-League Women.

Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, Forum Admins

Post Reply
Granny
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 12:41 pm

1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Granny »

What's your thoughts on back 4 without a sweeper. What coaches/teams are using this formation and how are you dealing with and over coming with the problems of getting caught out with a "flat back 4". I've always preferred to play and coach zonal positioning " but playing with a sweeper.
User avatar
pvfc
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 972
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 1:02 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by pvfc »

1-4-4-3? I would just call that cheating! :lol:

Sweeper? - what century are we in?
Super_Trooper
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4926
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 7:20 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Super_Trooper »

Depending on the team - Flat 4 asks for offside opportunities and unless you have a fit quick backline the last thing you want is for the quick break to slip thru and you're done..

I've mucked around with a 3-4-2-1 works quite well if your wide midfielders are fit enough to almost play a running back position to help the defence out when needed (corners etc). Found by having an abundance of strength through the midfield it generally kept the ball well away from defence anyways and if there was a quick break it was usually covered

Can only play 3 in backline against teams that dont play wide very well otherwise best to have that 4th defender in there.. with only 3 the two wide players get drawn out too easily leaving gaps in the middle

If I have 4 in the backline i like having the two centre defenders work off each other rather than say you are a stopper - you are a sweeper..

FFA coaching wording is very much against the use of the terms 'sweeper and stopper' anyways... Very 1980's!!!
neits/burgo/shadow
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 9:21 pm
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by neits/burgo/shadow »

Presuming you actually mean 1-4-3-3....

I am all for it. It's not easy to teach a new team a new system, especially if they have been playing with a sweeper most of the time. But its not impossible. It just takes time, persistence and accepting that mistakes can happen when you try something new.

I also think if you as a coach want to play this system, you need to be surrounded with people who are experienced with it, learn from these people and try transfer those concepts into your own team. Again, it may not be perfect straight away, but if we all decided it was too hard and went back to 'old school' football, the game here in Adelaide will only fall behind other states even more.

My job as a coach is to get as many of my players into state teams, development programs, Adelaide United and National teams. All of these teams play a 1-4-3-3 (or similar variations). It is my responsibility to prepare them for this so they have the best chance to be selected.

Vote #1 for 1-4-3-3 !!
Gubbo and team chi r #1!DJ Di is my hero!
ASIAN-SENSATION ARE FOREVER!

Perfect pitch with ALAGICH!!
Super_Trooper
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4926
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2002 7:20 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Super_Trooper »

I love the 4-3-3 and FFA is pushing for all teams to play this structure... I know at Adelaide City from the head coach (Edoardo) he is pushing for all teams to play to this structure that way as the players move from age groups up or to STIC's, state teams etc they dont have to learn a new system of play. Logical idea!

Doesnt mean that it will work straight away for each team and there is always someone who knows better..

I play with a different structure because frankly my div 1 team are what they are so we find a structure that works well for our needs and our league - training them into a 4-3-3 structure isnt always realistic for the div we are in..

As for juniors up to state/res/prem though - def. think isnt paramount!!!
Granny
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 12:41 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Granny »

pvfc wrote:1-4-4-3? I would just call that cheating! :lol:

Sweeper? - what century are we in?



Oh crap :oops:

yer 1 - 4 - 3 - 3
Granny
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 12:41 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Granny »

neits/burgo/shadow wrote:Presuming you actually mean 1-4-3-3....

I am all for it. It's not easy to teach a new team a new system, especially if they have been playing with a sweeper most of the time. But its not impossible. It just takes time, persistence and accepting that mistakes can happen when you try something new.

I also think if you as a coach want to play this system, you need to be surrounded with people who are experienced with it, learn from these people and try transfer those concepts into your own team. Again, it may not be perfect straight away, but if we all decided it was too hard and went back to 'old school' football, the game here in Adelaide will only fall behind other states even more.

My job as a coach is to get as many of my players into state teams, development programs, Adelaide United and National teams. All of these teams play a 1-4-3-3 (or similar variations). It is my responsibility to prepare them for this so they have the best chance to be selected.

Vote #1 for 1-4-3-3 !!


Totally agree with you there.
southern
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:45 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by southern »

I saw (especially in the state teams) a few teams that claim they play 4-3-3 actually playing 4-2-3-1...not very attaking/a bit predictable/boring. Bit stupid talking about numbers IMO. Nothing against 4-3-3, but players should be taught how to be more complete not how to play ONE system :shock:
neits/burgo/shadow
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 9:21 pm
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by neits/burgo/shadow »

Bad Egg wrote:I saw (especially in the state teams) a few teams that claim they play 4-3-3 actually playing 4-2-3-1


...again, a very similar variation
User avatar
paul merson
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 12076
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 6:32 pm
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by paul merson »

pvfc wrote:1-4-4-3? I would just call that cheating! :lol:

Sweeper? - what century are we in?
Barcenona played with one 3 weeks ago against Villareal.

Played a 3-4-3
Image
southern
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:45 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by southern »

Then also the 4-4-2 or the 4-3-2-1 or the 4-2-4 or the 4-1-3-2...they are all similar variations! So, in other words, it's not about the 4-3-3 at all, it's about how players play! :lol: And, just saying, what's wrong with a 3-4-3 then?
Fitz
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 605
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:21 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Fitz »

I play the 1-4-3-3, and it relies on pressure from the forwards and midfield to releive the back 4 of lots of the chance of getting caught flat. If the other team is behind your midfield, in the space between the 6 and the back 4, with strikers running into spaces or wide, you will be caught in a compromising position. The system relies on quick transitions, and high ball pressure further up the field. Its an excellent system when deployed correctly. High scores (as we are seeing in under-age levels) are common because players are too young to be getting into the finer details of the system that helps stop goals. Played with an intelligent team, who know the system, its an absolute joy to watch.
ImageImageImage
Super Nala
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:53 am

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Super Nala »

neits/burgo/shadow wrote:Presuming you actually mean 1-4-3-3....

I am all for it. It's not easy to teach a new team a new system, especially if they have been playing with a sweeper most of the time. But its not impossible. It just takes time, persistence and accepting that mistakes can happen when you try something new.

I also think if you as a coach want to play this system, you need to be surrounded with people who are experienced with it, learn from these people and try transfer those concepts into your own team. Again, it may not be perfect straight away, but if we all decided it was too hard and went back to 'old school' football, the game here in Adelaide will only fall behind other states even more.

My job as a coach is to get as many of my players into state teams, development programs, Adelaide United and National teams. All of these teams play a 1-4-3-3 (or similar variations). It is my responsibility to prepare them for this so they have the best chance to be selected.

Vote #1 for 1-4-3-3 !!
I agree. I coached a new team this year that had never played the 1-4-3-3 system, but with the right training and information they picked it up quickly and did very well this year.

I think as a coach you need to understand the system yourself before you can get the team to play it. I always try to go and watch as many state training session/games as possible. Its amazing what you can pick up from just watching. It also helps to select the right type of players that suit the system. No longer does a fullback need to be big and strong who just wins the ball and kicks it long. The new fullbacks need to be quick and have a good first touch as the 1-4-3-3 starts from playing out from the back. Even the goal keeper needs to be able to play and act as a another defender (the old sweeper).

Playing the 1-4-3-3 formation does help the players develop into better players. From my team this year, 4 players made a state team and another 6 players have been selected in a STIC team.
Drusetta
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 579
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:40 pm

Re: 1 4 4 3 formation

Post by Drusetta »

neits/burgo/shadow wrote:Presuming you actually mean 1-4-3-3....

I am all for it. It's not easy to teach a new team a new system, especially if they have been playing with a sweeper most of the time. But its not impossible. It just takes time, persistence and accepting that mistakes can happen when you try something new.

I also think if you as a coach want to play this system, you need to be surrounded with people who are experienced with it, learn from these people and try transfer those concepts into your own team. Again, it may not be perfect straight away, but if we all decided it was too hard and went back to 'old school' football, the game here in Adelaide will only fall behind other states even more.

My job as a coach is to get as many of my players into state teams, development programs, Adelaide United and National teams. All of these teams play a 1-4-3-3 (or similar variations). It is my responsibility to prepare them for this so they have the best chance to be selected.

Vote #1 for 1-4-3-3 !!
Agreed!
For the Game. For the World.

Drusetta
Post Reply