Results Round 1 - 27 March

This forum is for discussion relating to junior football.

Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins

stiring the porridge
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:55 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by stiring the porridge »

might be easier to send a letter to all the clubs
User avatar
PhilDunphy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by PhilDunphy »

U/16A

Campbelltown 0 - 3 ABE
User avatar
Stitch This
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 11903
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Stitch This »

.
Last edited by Stitch This on Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Time for some righteous indignation
spooky1972
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 718
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 10:09 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by spooky1972 »

Any chance anyone has results in following games?

U/13B

sturt v croydon
Mod jets v sth ade
User avatar
Green_Manalishi
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:34 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Green_Manalishi »

......and 17A

Comets vs Croydon
Para vs WAB
Occasionally available in blue
User avatar
PhilDunphy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by PhilDunphy »

Green_Manalishi wrote:......and 17A

Comets 0 vs Croydon 1
Para 5 vs WAB 0
hope that helps :wink:
User avatar
Green_Manalishi
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:34 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Green_Manalishi »

gerr8rd wrote:
Green_Manalishi wrote:......and 17A

Comets 0 vs Croydon 1
Para 5 vs WAB 0
hope that helps :wink:
You've got the job!!
Occasionally available in blue
spooky1972
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 718
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 10:09 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by spooky1972 »

spooky1972 wrote:Any chance anyone has results in following games?

U/13B

sturt v croydon
Mod jets v sth ade

Sth Ade 2 Mod Jets 13
Eduardo Caroccio
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:56 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Eduardo Caroccio »

Will ffsa be updating the site on mondays this year?
User avatar
PhilDunphy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by PhilDunphy »

Eduardo Caroccio wrote:Will ffsa be updating the site on mondays this year?
they usually had results up on the site by lunchtime on mondays LAST year

I think they're still entering the fixtures/results/tables sections on the site at the moment so we may have to wait a few days to get results this week, but next week things SHOULD be back to normal :wink:
User avatar
PhilDunphy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by PhilDunphy »

U/16A Round 1 Results:

Campbelltown 0 - 3 ABE
Para Hills 9 - 1 Croydon
MetroStars 2 - 1 Raiders
Comets vs West Adelaide.......Postponed
Modbury 1 - 3 Adelaide City
Playford 8 - 0 WT Birkalla
jomona
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 6:02 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by jomona »

Can anybody help with U15B results?

I have:
Toros 3-Noarlun 4, Playford 7-Cumber 2, Comets 7-Hills 0.
Need, Croydon-Cobras,Seaford-Raiders.

Thanks
User avatar
Željko Jurin
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Željko Jurin »

jomona wrote:Can anybody help with U15B results?

I have:
Toros 3-Noarlun 4, Playford 7-Cumber 2, Comets 7-Hills 0.
Need, Croydon-Cobras,Seaford-Raiders.

Thanks
Raiders 3-2
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......

Image
pottermus
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:39 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by pottermus »

Wendy Carter gave permission for Central United to field 4 overage players in their under 15's. Some were knocking on 18.

So if short just drop older players down...!!!

Another typical day at FFSA headquarters.....
rossonero
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 9:53 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by rossonero »

not only but the referee even allowed a player play with black slippers......what a shamble!!!
Kreas
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:02 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Kreas »

does anyone have results from the 15A's
beskid
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 273
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:59 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by beskid »

U13B Croydon v Sturt 7-0
frustrated
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by frustrated »

pottermus wrote:Wendy Carter gave permission for Central United to field 4 overage players in their under 15's. Some were knocking on 18.

So if short just drop older players down...!!!

Another typical day at FFSA headquarters.....
I can top this plympton under 16 have been put in the under 15 state league this year as they were the only team other than croydon to nominate (i believe but stand corrected on this point), croydon playing in under 17 c assume as they are a fed club, plympton told need to play in state league as not fed club and as no u16jsl have been but in u15's not sure how this works for the clubs they meet this year i assume opponents will be able to play u16 against them if they wish.
User avatar
Željko Jurin
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Željko Jurin »

frustrated wrote:
pottermus wrote:Wendy Carter gave permission for Central United to field 4 overage players in their under 15's. Some were knocking on 18.

So if short just drop older players down...!!!

Another typical day at FFSA headquarters.....
I can top this plympton under 16 have been put in the under 15 state league this year as they were the only team other than croydon to nominate (i believe but stand corrected on this point), croydon playing in under 17 c assume as they are a fed club, plympton told need to play in state league as not fed club and as no u16jsl have been but in u15's not sure how this works for the clubs they meet this year i assume opponents will be able to play u16 against them if they wish.
,
Does it really matter, does it really ???

Is it better that 15 kids get a game somewhere, rather then be lost to the game

Atleast you will get a tough game when you play them, and it will be a challenge..... I'm sure they are not all 16 this year as well .....
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......

Image
rossonero
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 9:53 am

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by rossonero »

what if that 15s team played a 13 or 14 yr old kid and after going into a tackle against a 18 yr old he breaks his leg???
User avatar
Željko Jurin
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:25 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Željko Jurin »

rossonero wrote:what if that 15s team played a 13 or 14 yr old kid and after going into a tackle against a 18 yr old he breaks his leg???
I'm talking about Plympton 16s ......
Spot Željko Jurin Jnr ......

Image
User avatar
Dr Feelgood
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 792
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:14 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Dr Feelgood »

rossonero wrote:what if that 15s team played a 13 or 14 yr old kid and after going into a tackle against a 18 yr old he breaks his leg???
Did they have rego cards that showed their age or are we getting into the old "They're African so they must be lying about their age" syndrome?
Image

It's not that I'm old - your music really does SUCK
User avatar
Dr Feelgood
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 792
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:14 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Dr Feelgood »

frustrated wrote:I can top this plympton under 16 have been put in the under 15 state league this year as they were the only team other than croydon to nominate (i believe but stand corrected on this point), croydon playing in under 17 c assume as they are a fed club, plympton told need to play in state league as not fed club and as no u16jsl have been but in u15's not sure how this works for the clubs they meet this year i assume opponents will be able to play u16 against them if they wish.
FFSA wrote:Dear all

Due to withdrawal of a team from the JSL Under 17 League, the Football Federation SA has been left with five teams for this competition, a viable competition cannot be conducted with only five teams. As a consequence of this the Football Federation SA has looked at other alternatives to accommodate these teams.

The only feasible option is to accommodate the teams in either the JPL Under 16B or Under 17C leagues. Consequently Central United and Croydon will be accommodated in the Under 17C and Campbelltown City, Plympton and Seaford will be accommodated in the Under 16B.

As you would all be aware this is the first year that the JSL has been introduced and therefore it may take some time for these structures to fully develop. .......
So you are saying that the above as outlined by the FFSA in fact has not happened?
Image

It's not that I'm old - your music really does SUCK
User avatar
Green_Manalishi
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:34 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Green_Manalishi »

Still nothing on the FFSA web site. Senior results are up, Womens are up, Girls are up - but no Junior Boys.

This coming weekend's headline fixtures and previews for Seniors already up, so no excuses.

Pretty poor really.
Occasionally available in blue
User avatar
PhilDunphy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2753
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 2:00 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by PhilDunphy »

Green_Manalishi wrote:Still nothing on the FFSA web site. Senior results are up, Womens are up, Girls are up - but no Junior Boys.

This coming weekend's headline fixtures and previews for Seniors already up, so no excuses.

Pretty poor really.
that's FFSA for you :roll:
Cruyff
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Cruyff »

I have been told U/15 Plympton side has moved to White City with Greg Griffen as coach. White City did not have an U/16 side, but due to the kids coming across from Plympton have now fielded an U/16 team and most of the kids are eligible to move between U/15 and U/17 due to their age as seen in the Manchester Cup ?
Cruyff
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by Cruyff »

Noticed White City U/17's had a bye this week but are now playing Campbelltown. A girls team were originally in U/16B have now been removed (dont know where) and White City added.
frustrated
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:19 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by frustrated »

Zeljko Jurin wrote:
frustrated wrote:
pottermus wrote:Wendy Carter gave permission for Central United to field 4 overage players in their under 15's. Some were knocking on 18.

So if short just drop older players down...!!!

Another typical day at FFSA headquarters.....
I can top this plympton under 16 have been put in the under 15 state league this year as they were the only team other than croydon to nominate (i believe but stand corrected on this point), croydon playing in under 17 c assume as they are a fed club, plympton told need to play in state league as not fed club and as no u16jsl have been but in u15's not sure how this works for the clubs they meet this year i assume opponents will be able to play u16 against them if they wish.
,
Does it really matter, does it really ???

Is it better that 15 kids get a game somewhere, rather then be lost to the game

Atleast you will get a tough game when you play them, and it will be a challenge..... I'm sure they are not all 16 this year as well .....
I agree with you the kids should just be allowed to play however would it not be fair on all involved if they played their own age
Dr Feelgood wrote:
frustrated wrote:I can top this plympton under 16 have been put in the under 15 state league this year as they were the only team other than croydon to nominate (i believe but stand corrected on this point), croydon playing in under 17 c assume as they are a fed club, plympton told need to play in state league as not fed club and as no u16jsl have been but in u15's not sure how this works for the clubs they meet this year i assume opponents will be able to play u16 against them if they wish.
FFSA wrote:Dear all

Due to withdrawal of a team from the JSL Under 17 League, the Football Federation SA has been left with five teams for this competition, a viable competition cannot be conducted with only five teams. As a consequence of this the Football Federation SA has looked at other alternatives to accommodate these teams.

The only feasible option is to accommodate the teams in either the JPL Under 16B or Under 17C leagues. Consequently Central United and Croydon will be accommodated in the Under 17C and Campbelltown City, Plympton and Seaford will be accommodated in the Under 16B.

As you would all be aware this is the first year that the JSL has been introduced and therefore it may take some time for these structures to fully develop. .......
So you are saying that the above as outlined by the FFSA in fact has not happened?
yes I can confirm Plympton uner 16 playing in under 15 state league was confirmed thursday before the first game, last wek ist round against munnoparra,
crusaider
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by crusaider »

get rid of the jsl & go back to old system too many decent players forced to play in basically a school league not enough teams fringe players leaving the game because they cant break into an jpl team. imo i dont think its helping our game one bit all we will keep seeing is kids club swapping every year
johnydep
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 5803
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:17 pm

Re: Results Round 1 - 27 March

Post by johnydep »

crusaider wrote:get rid of the jsl & go back to old system too many decent players forced to play in basically a school league not enough teams fringe players leaving the game because they cant break into an jpl team. imo i dont think its helping our game one bit all we will keep seeing is kids club swapping every year
"get rid of the jsl & go back to old system too many decent players forced to play in basically a school league" - I think the idea was to give kids a choice; elite football - JPL, social football (school league, as you put it) - JSL.

"fringe players leaving the game because they cant break into an jpl team" - Our club is not seeing that, we're getting a lot of calls from parents of kids that have only played school and are looking for a club.

"imo i dont think its helping our game one bit all we will keep seeing is kids club swapping every year" - they were "club swapping" long before the JSL, and they'll keep doing it as long as parents think the grass is greener, or finding the "best" team is how they'll get their kid to be a super star.

At the end of the day, 'the cream always floats to the top'. Let the kids play and enjoy the game with their mates, if their destined to be a great player they'll get noticed. First they need to train 4 nights per week and play a game, practice every day. eat well, sleep well, drink well and have a good attitude. Then, if they're lucky they'll get somewhere.
Post Reply