Randoman wrote:really should retitle this topic as Hawkesy v Colossus XXI
I've come to the, not so surprising conclusion, that they're all bottle of shiraz knobheads and not one of them is a Spurs supporter.
I am, and always have been (a Spurs supporter, not a knobhead ), and the only thing Clattenburg did wrong was failing to make it abundantly clear that he was playing advantage.
I admit it, I'm not a spurs supporter. However, my uncle used to play in their youth team (Steve Perryman was the captain of his side) and I have listened to Chas and Dave.
Randoman wrote:really should retitle this topic as Hawkesy v Colossus XXI
I've come to the, not so surprising conclusion, that they're all bottle of shiraz knobheads and not one of them is a Spurs supporter.
I am, and always have been (a Spurs supporter, not a knobhead ), and the only thing Clattenburg did wrong was failing to make it abundantly clear that he was playing advantage.
I admit it, I'm not a spurs supporter. However, my uncle used to play in their youth team (Steve Perryman was the captain of his side) and I have listened to Chas and Dave.
You're all yap, yap, rabbit, rabbit.
Last edited by Nice One Cyril on Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Bomber wrote:I like how Col accuses others of "wiggling their way out of it". This is coming from someone who spat it and went missing for a couple of months and now after advice of his attorney is addressing the alleged comments that he could have done in the first place?
Now accuses others of hypocrisy?
You havent lost your touch, thats for sure, but I thought some good professional therapy would at least mean having some better ammo now.
WTF are you on about??? Bomber, go and eat some more Kranskys and drink some more beer pal, you make more sense whewn your full and drunk
Bomber wrote:I like how Col accuses others of "wiggling their way out of it". This is coming from someone who spat it and went missing for a couple of months and now after advice of his attorney is addressing the alleged comments that he could have done in the first place?
Now accuses others of hypocrisy?
You havent lost your touch, thats for sure, but I thought some good professional therapy would at least mean having some better ammo now.
WTF are you on about??? Bomber, go and eat some more Kranskys and drink some more beer pal, you make more sense whewn your full and drunk
What part dont you understand? I have correct spelling, grammar and have presented a factual post.
MUFCBOY wrote:boys there was a penalty b4 the nani goal that was never given...
Not so sure it was so nailed on, although I wouldn't have complained if it had been given. Vidic and Ferdinand do that all the time and rarely get pinged so, some you get, some you don't. Bizarrely, Nani who's one of the worst divers in the PL, stayed on his feet, then he realised he'd mucked it up and reverted to form and dived on the ball.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
MUFCBOY wrote:boys there was a penalty b4 the nani goal that was never given...
Thats debatable, what is NOT debatable is that there was a clear and deliberate handball which wasnt picked up by the ref but was by the assistant. What is comical, is that the after the assistant telling the ref about the hand ball, the referee allows the goal to stand and thats the whole point of this issue. Would of been much easier and less embarassing for the clatter had he given the penalty because weve seen them given for less
MUFCBOY wrote:boys there was a penalty b4 the nani goal that was never given...
Thats debatable, what is NOT debatable is that there was a clear and deliberate handball which wasnt picked up by the ref but was by the assistant. What is comical, is that the after the assistant telling the ref about the hand ball, the referee allows the goal to stand and thats the whole point of this issue. Would of been much easier and less embarassing for the clatter had he given the penalty because weve seen them given for less
how do you know what the assistant referee was saying?
TPAKAC wrote:And what about if his assistant sees it smart ass???
The linesman signalled nothing until well after the ball was in the net. He even ran towards the halfway line as linesmen often do when a goal is scored.
The Kop wrote:I pray to Jesus, Buddah, Allah and Katy Perry's tits daily
Randoman wrote:really should retitle this topic as Hawkesy v Colossus XXI
I've come to the, not so surprising conclusion, that they're all bottle of shiraz knobheads and not one of them is a Spurs supporter.
I am, and always have been (a Spurs supporter, not a knobhead ), and the only thing Clattenburg did wrong was failing to make it abundantly clear that he was playing advantage.
Perhaps he didn't see a handball hence there being to advantage to play.
The Kop wrote:I pray to Jesus, Buddah, Allah and Katy Perry's tits daily
MUFCBOY wrote:boys there was a penalty b4 the nani goal that was never given...
Thats debatable, what is NOT debatable is that there was a clear and deliberate handball which wasnt picked up by the ref but was by the assistant. What is comical, is that the after the assistant telling the ref about the hand ball, the referee allows the goal to stand and thats the whole point of this issue. Would of been much easier and less embarassing for the clatter had he given the penalty because weve seen them given for less
how do you know what the assistant referee was saying?
Because its been well noted and the main reason that even after the referee awarded the goal, Rio Ferdinan continued to remonstrate to the assistant which has also been noted. In any case, even if it werent well noted, why would the assistant flag to see the referee apart from send a Totenham player off for foul language which obviously wasnt the case???
COLOSSUS wrote:Because its been well noted and the main reason that even after the referee awarded the goal, Rio Ferdinan continued to remonstrate to the assistant which has also been noted. In any case, even if it werent well noted, why would the assistant flag to see the referee apart from send a Totenham player off for foul language which obviously wasnt the case???
How do you know that wasn't the case. How do you know the AR didn't call him over to tell him about the original foul and he thought the player should be booked. Remember he's there to advise the referee not run the game. There are too many variables and it is inpossible that you know what he said, unless you know the blokes or they actually give an interview (which they won't as the FA bans them from doing so).
I've come to the, not so surprising conclusion, that they're all bottle of shiraz knobheads and not one of them is a Spurs supporter.
), and the only thing Clattenburg did wrong was failing to make it abundantly clear that he was playing advantage.
), and the only thing Clattenburg did wrong was failing to make it abundantly clear that he was playing advantage.
btw ,is there any man utd fan here ?