FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:58 pm
FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Just wondering what the thoughts are on having finals series structure in the Amateur leagues
just seeing what the thoughts are round South Australia
just seeing what the thoughts are round South Australia
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
For me, personally it's no.
Why risk being the best team all year round (home and away), to catch a team in great form who could get the better of you on the final day
Playing home and away settles all arguments. The ladder never lies about which team were the best over 18 games. (Or however many teams are in your div)
Why risk being the best team all year round (home and away), to catch a team in great form who could get the better of you on the final day
Playing home and away settles all arguments. The ladder never lies about which team were the best over 18 games. (Or however many teams are in your div)
COLOSSUS wrote:Let me guess, ive got no balls
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
I always liked playing finals in other sports so I would say yes....There is something about
the feeling of Finals Football
the feeling of Finals Football
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:11 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Big no from me
BLSC - est 1971
1982 Div 4b
1989 Div 3b
2004 Div 4b
2006 Div 4a & Div 10
2009 Div 3b
2010 Div 3a & 3b
2013 Div 2b & Div 7
2014 Div 2b
2015 Div 2a, 2b, & Div 6 Sat & Sun
1982 Div 4b
1989 Div 3b
2004 Div 4b
2006 Div 4a & Div 10
2009 Div 3b
2010 Div 3a & 3b
2013 Div 2b & Div 7
2014 Div 2b
2015 Div 2a, 2b, & Div 6 Sat & Sun
- Made in Australia
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:50 am
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:19 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
How about a top 4 Cup after the season ends. The top 4 teams in the league qualify.
The top team is still the Div champions but brings a bit of serious knockout football post season.
Just an idea.
The top team is still the Div champions but brings a bit of serious knockout football post season.
Just an idea.
- Dad's Army
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 10:03 am
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
We have cup semifinals and finals after the season already.UniSA wrote:How about a top 4 Cup after the season ends. The top 4 teams in the league qualify.
The top team is still the Div champions but brings a bit of serious knockout football post season.
Just an idea.
Keep the league separate.
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
There used to be the Templin Cup which was a pre-season comp with 8 teams, 2 x groups of 4 with a final at the end.UniSA wrote:How about a top 4 Cup after the season ends. The top 4 teams in the league qualify.
The top team is still the Div champions but brings a bit of serious knockout football post season.
Just an idea.
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
- Outlaw 2.0
- Star Player
- Posts: 4343
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Evergreen wrote:Absolutely no.
http://www.oisc.com.au
Championships
A Grade: 1990, 1991, 1992, 2007, 2010
B Grade: 2001, 2007
C Grade: 2004, 2010
D Grade: 2009, 2010
Cups
A Grade: 1989
B Grade: 2002
Championships
A Grade: 1990, 1991, 1992, 2007, 2010
B Grade: 2001, 2007
C Grade: 2004, 2010
D Grade: 2009, 2010
Cups
A Grade: 1989
B Grade: 2002
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4238
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:35 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
yeah... let's drag the season on even more... or stop all the other teams playing earlier just so a team sitting 4th can win a flag...
finals = waste of time
so make that a NO
finals = waste of time
so make that a NO
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:29 am
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Yes great idea lets reward those that are average & get them to play against the good teams because our competition needs it.
Your dreaming no way
Your dreaming no way
I eat football, I sleep football, I breathe football. I'm not mad, I'm just passionate....Thierry Henry
- KING NUGGETT
- Star Player
- Posts: 2482
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 2:36 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Go Play Aussie Rules then...Franco UnAmerican wrote:I always liked playing finals in other sports so I would say yes....There is something about
the feeling of Finals Football
It's all about the 18 League games.
SAASL DIV.1 CHAMPIONS 73,75,78,02,10,11,13
CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 74,75,80,08,10,11,13
SAASL DIV.1 RES. CHAMPIONS 71,75,77,78,79,94,11,13
RES. CUP WINNERS 73,75,76,13
CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS 10
CICHANOWSKI SHIELD 90,08,11,12,14
Est.1966
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 11:06 am
- Outlaw 2.0
- Star Player
- Posts: 4343
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
what you meant was...lefty wrote:Yes great idea lets reward those that are average & get them to play against the good teams because our competition needs it.
Your dreaming no way
lefty wrote:Yes great idea lets reward those that are average & get them to play against the good teams because our competition needs it.
Your dreaming no way
HA'WAY THE LADS
- Lucas Leiva
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:32 am
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
18 league games isn't enough. I preferred 22 when in a division of 12 teams.
However if all divisions were 10 teams and there was no Champion of Champions, why not? I think finals are not a bad idea for the top division where playing for that 2nd promotion spot doesn't occur.
However if all divisions were 10 teams and there was no Champion of Champions, why not? I think finals are not a bad idea for the top division where playing for that 2nd promotion spot doesn't occur.
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:00 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Finals are a great idea. Bring excitment back to the competition. Anyone who has played finals football knows the standard and desperation is raised. Top team gets automatic promotion and the other 4 teams fight it out for the second promotion spot.
If your in div 1 then its a chance to show your dominance by taking out both the minor premiership and the final series. Every team should strive to make finals and it gives the lesser teams a chance to make something of their season with a do or die attituted.
Yes to Finals
If your in div 1 then its a chance to show your dominance by taking out both the minor premiership and the final series. Every team should strive to make finals and it gives the lesser teams a chance to make something of their season with a do or die attituted.
Yes to Finals
- KING NUGGETT
- Star Player
- Posts: 2482
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 2:36 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
I Think that was tounge in cheek Outlaw...Outlaw 2.0 wrote:what you meant was...lefty wrote:Yes great idea lets reward those that are average & get them to play against the good teams because our competition needs it.
Your dreaming no way
lefty wrote:Yes great idea lets reward those that are average & get them to play against the good teams because our competition needs it.
Your dreaming no way
SAASL DIV.1 CHAMPIONS 73,75,78,02,10,11,13
CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 74,75,80,08,10,11,13
SAASL DIV.1 RES. CHAMPIONS 71,75,77,78,79,94,11,13
RES. CUP WINNERS 73,75,76,13
CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS 10
CICHANOWSKI SHIELD 90,08,11,12,14
Est.1966
- KING NUGGETT
- Star Player
- Posts: 2482
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 2:36 pm
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Isn't that what the Cup is for look at the Valeaussie_spud wrote:Finals are a great idea. Bring excitment back to the competition. Anyone who has played finals football knows the standard and desperation is raised. Top team gets automatic promotion and the other 4 teams fight it out for the second promotion spot.
If your in div 1 then its a chance to show your dominance by taking out both the minor premiership and the final series. Every team should strive to make finals and it gives the lesser teams a chance to make something of their season with a do or die attituted.
Yes to Finals
Finals are for the AFL not Soccer!
SAASL DIV.1 CHAMPIONS 73,75,78,02,10,11,13
CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS 74,75,80,08,10,11,13
SAASL DIV.1 RES. CHAMPIONS 71,75,77,78,79,94,11,13
RES. CUP WINNERS 73,75,76,13
CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS 10
CICHANOWSKI SHIELD 90,08,11,12,14
Est.1966
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
There is a final series, its called the Amatuer League Challenge Cup. Other than that there is absolutely no way in hell there should be a finals series to decide divisional winners over a season. Sure it may bring some excitement but so does winning the league.
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
Thoughts on a finals series for the other promoted team ala the playoffs in England?
I think it would be ok if there were 3 teams going up, but not for 2 teams going up.
I think it would be ok if there were 3 teams going up, but not for 2 teams going up.
http://www.oisc.com.au
Championships
A Grade: 1990, 1991, 1992, 2007, 2010
B Grade: 2001, 2007
C Grade: 2004, 2010
D Grade: 2009, 2010
Cups
A Grade: 1989
B Grade: 2002
Championships
A Grade: 1990, 1991, 1992, 2007, 2010
B Grade: 2001, 2007
C Grade: 2004, 2010
D Grade: 2009, 2010
Cups
A Grade: 1989
B Grade: 2002
Re: FINALS SERIES IN AMATEUR LEAGUE? YES OR NO
absolutely notKitchimo wrote:Thoughts on a finals series for the other promoted team ala the playoffs in England?
I think it would be ok if there were 3 teams going up, but not for 2 teams going up.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".