Regarding Harry
Moderators: Randoman, BillShankly, arxidi, Forum Admins
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:49 pm
Regarding Harry
Given that Harry Kewell is still waiting for an all-clear to play after almost six months on the sidelines (apart from a measly two minute stint for Galatasaray some weeks back), it appears that he is little or no chance of getting through three intense group matches at the World Cup, especially given there's only a five-day break between each match. He will most likely be rested against Denmark and then play a fair chunk of the USA game so he can get some match fitness before the WC starts.
He was unconditioned going into 06 and could only manage to play the first and third games, missing the Brazil match in between, as well as the knockout match against Italy. In the group stage that worked out well, as he got to play in the two games they had a good chance in and missed out on the game they were likely to lose anyway. This time around however, the schedule is not so kind.
Their biggest chance for a win is obviously against Ghana and that match is sandwiched in between the Germany and Serbia games. So, how does everyone think Pim should use Harry?
I think perhaps bring him on as a sub against Germany, play him for the whole game against Ghana and then hope he's right to play some part against Serbia.
He was unconditioned going into 06 and could only manage to play the first and third games, missing the Brazil match in between, as well as the knockout match against Italy. In the group stage that worked out well, as he got to play in the two games they had a good chance in and missed out on the game they were likely to lose anyway. This time around however, the schedule is not so kind.
Their biggest chance for a win is obviously against Ghana and that match is sandwiched in between the Germany and Serbia games. So, how does everyone think Pim should use Harry?
I think perhaps bring him on as a sub against Germany, play him for the whole game against Ghana and then hope he's right to play some part against Serbia.
- TOPGUNJIMMYAUFC
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11578
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:39 pm
Re: Regarding Harry
should just retire.....
RADIO LALASEMENO
http://www.lalasemeno.gr
this has just changed my life............above link
dont use my name..
What has 100 legs & 4 teeth? The front row of the Collingwood cheer squad
http://www.lalasemeno.gr
this has just changed my life............above link
dont use my name..
What has 100 legs & 4 teeth? The front row of the Collingwood cheer squad
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:04 pm
- Red-4-Life
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 12562
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:24 pm
Re: Regarding Harry
Kewell's one of our best players but his because of his injuries i feelwe wont see the best out of him in South Africa
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:47 am
Re: Regarding Harry
Given that your facts are wrong, try again. He played all three group games, and missed the game against Italy due to gout/whatever they worked it out to be in the end.ComeBackDukes! wrote:He was unconditioned going into 06 and could only manage to play the first and third games, missing the Brazil match in between, as well as the knockout match against Italy. In the group stage that worked out well, as he got to play in the two games they had a good chance in and missed out on the game they were likely to lose anyway. This time around however, the schedule is not so kind.
Their biggest chance for a win is obviously against Ghana and that match is sandwiched in between the Germany and Serbia games. So, how does everyone think Pim should use Harry?
I think perhaps bring him on as a sub against Germany, play him for the whole game against Ghana and then hope he's right to play some part against Serbia.
I still think if we had Kewell against Italy, we would've gone through (given the same situation).
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:49 pm
Re: Regarding Harry
My bad.......I forgot he came off the bench against Brazil for 30 minutes. But he still wasn't up to starting all three group games, and I doubt he will this time around either. I think he has to play 90 minutes against Ghana, which means maybe not starting him against Germany.
Re: Regarding Harry
I think its seriously risky to leave out McDonald and rely on Kewell as a striker. Not so much taking anything away from Kewell or any of the other strikers. I dont feel it necessary to bag the other strikers like Holman in the process of saying McDonald should be on the plane. In a lot of the forums people seem polarized and tend to attack one player in order to support another. My overall feeling after the NZ game was Scott should still go to S.A.-as Kewell wont really be 100 percent and just like the last world cup could miss crucial games. We need to be able to send on other strikers to chase games(especially ones not injured) Well its all said and done now, guess there is no point in going on about it-its just sad to see such a wasted opportunity that was served up on a silver platter. Moore should be cut-not McDonald. Kewell is a great player and thanks to him we progressed through our group last World Cup-what a great memory that is! It will take me a bit longer to get over the Scotty snub, but im looking forward to the friendly with Denmark! World Cup here we come
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:49 pm
Re: Regarding Harry
Well, he would want to be able to complete a training session where all they do is jog around for an hour or so.DOC wrote:he and schwarzer completed the first training session fully
Kewell and Emerton both sat out the first proprer training session last night our time.
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 11:49 pm
Re: Regarding Harry
I agree totally, McDonald had to go, especially given Kewell's injury concerns. He would have been a shoe-in in my 23 even if Kewell had been playing the past six months. The argument about McDonald not being suited to this system may be relevant if you are comparing systems in order to determine which suits him more as a player, but the point is that he is still better under this system in that lone-striker role than Kennedy, Rukavytsya and Vidosic, whether it suits him best or not and whether he is scoring goals or not. But in saying that, Pim deserves the benefit of the doubt until the group stage is over. If they progress, or at least give it a good shake, then people can't be too critical of him when it's all said and done.Ozgoalz wrote:I think its seriously risky to leave out McDonald and rely on Kewell as a striker. Not so much taking anything away from Kewell or any of the other strikers. I dont feel it necessary to bag the other strikers like Holman in the process of saying McDonald should be on the plane. In a lot of the forums people seem polarized and tend to attack one player in order to support another. My overall feeling after the NZ game was Scott should still go to S.A.-as Kewell wont really be 100 percent and just like the last world cup could miss crucial games. We need to be able to send on other strikers to chase games(especially ones not injured) Well its all said and done now, guess there is no point in going on about it-its just sad to see such a wasted opportunity that was served up on a silver platter. Moore should be cut-not McDonald. Kewell is a great player and thanks to him we progressed through our group last World Cup-what a great memory that is! It will take me a bit longer to get over the Scotty snub, but im looking forward to the friendly with Denmark! World Cup here we come
Re: Regarding Harry
I can't see Kewell really playing that much, injury is just going to keep him on the sidelines. Maybe one game and then thats it.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22041
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Re: Regarding Harry
I am really worried about Harry, plus our shortage of strikers in our squad.OwnGoal wrote:I can't see Kewell really playing that much, injury is just going to keep him on the sidelines. Maybe one game and then thats it.
Re: Regarding Harry
time is running out for him, can an injured player in the final squad of 23 get replaced?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22041
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Re: Regarding Harry
Lots of countries have injury issues just look at the English,Spanish and German squads. Problem is we don't have the depth of the major football powers.Jock wrote:Is there an Australian player who is not injured?
Re: Regarding Harry
We looked to be playing better against Denmark than we did against New Zealand, so i take heart in that. It will all come down to how they play on the day, we don't have much else to go on. McDonald looked amazing with Celtic, yet couldnt reproduce the goals for the green and gold, which is a real shame as i was looking forward to having him in our arsenal this World Cup. Kennedy seems to be a good scorer in the J League so he can't be counted out, and Kewell has produced magic in Turkey (before the dreaded staple debacle). And Cahill, what a legend. I'm sick of the bagging and negativity that came after the NZ game. Lets get right behind the team now, i reckon we have a real good chance of progressing out of our group, in which case if England make it, it will be EPIC, like a final before the final. Lets hope that happens, it will go off!!! World Cup party time!!