Results Saturday 22/5
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Go to wild west and I tell ya how I feel
In 1854 Thomas Aitken had a hard earned thirst.
- Dad's Army
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 10:03 am
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Actually it did sound a lot like a TGJ postHawkesy wrote:are you tgj in disguise because I can't understand a word of that.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
I disagree, at the head kicks are far more dangerousBodø Glimt wrote:Overhead kicks are dangerous play anyway you look at it.Franco UnAmerican wrote:Boo Hoo....I don't see how a player should get a red for a legitimate play....Kitchimo wrote:Not the first time a Vipers player hurt the opposition from an attempted bicycle kick. Did the ref red card him?
The day you deserve a Red for an accidental contact is the day I give it away.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Franco UnAmerican wrote:Tell me the last time a red was awarded when a bicycle kick resulted in a goal?
It would be a bullsh1t penalty if awarded in any circumstance.
harsh, but justified.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
- Dad's Army
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 10:03 am
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
It wouldn't result in a penalty but a free kick to the defending team if deemed dangerous play.Franco UnAmerican wrote:Tell me the last time a red was awarded when a bicycle kick resulted in a goal?
It would be a bullsh1t penalty if awarded in any circumstance.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Hawkesy wrote:Franco UnAmerican wrote:Tell me the last time a red was awarded when a bicycle kick resulted in a goal?
It would be a bullsh1t penalty if awarded in any circumstance.
harsh, but justified.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Bodø Glimt wrote:It wouldn't result in a penalty but a free kick to the defending team if deemed dangerous play.Franco UnAmerican wrote:Tell me the last time a red was awarded when a bicycle kick resulted in a goal?
It would be a bullsh1t penalty if awarded in any circumstance.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Bodø Glimt wrote:Actually it did sound a lot like a TGJ postHawkesy wrote:are you tgj in disguise because I can't understand a word of that.
I went to the same dealer.....
In 1854 Thomas Aitken had a hard earned thirst.
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Probably hasn't happened, cos contact was made with the ball and not the head.Franco UnAmerican wrote:Bodø Glimt wrote:It wouldn't result in a penalty but a free kick to the defending team if deemed dangerous play.Franco UnAmerican wrote:Tell me the last time a red was awarded when a bicycle kick resulted in a goal?
It would be a bullsh1t penalty if awarded in any circumstance.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Da fock, wasn't even in the box. Sory no pen
In 1854 Thomas Aitken had a hard earned thirst.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Bacon888 wrote:Probably hasn't happened, cos contact was made with the ball and not the head.
he makes a good point, would just be an indirect free kick
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Franco UnAmerican wrote:Bodø Glimt wrote:It wouldn't result in a penalty but a free kick to the defending team if deemed dangerous play.Franco UnAmerican wrote:Tell me the last time a red was awarded when a bicycle kick resulted in a goal?
It would be a bullsh1t penalty if awarded in any circumstance.
An 80m over head kicked goal would be impressive though.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
- Lucas Leiva
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:32 am
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
It was an attacking bicycle on goal, and I just didn't see the defender coming from the side to header the ball. He knocked it off the toes of my boot and the foot came plum on his nose. There was no intention for it to be malicious, a deflection placed the ball behind me and my marker was never going to get to it, so I instinctively reacted. Once again, I apologise. I also apologised to the ref, who understood and interpreted the scenario correctly.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:00 pm
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Adelaide Uni 2 Adelaide Villa 2 (Res 1-3)
Uni in control in the opening 20 Mins and deservedly went 1 up and also hit the post. Villa settled and equalised to go 1-1 at HT. Second half Villa mostly in control in an even contest with a goal a piece mid way through. Villa had a couple cleared off the line but all in all a draw a fair result to be honest.....Uni will be very hard to beat especially at home.
Congratulations to Tony Scalzi for his first game in charge after Rick stepped down to a playing role due to work commitments. Thanks to Ciucc for his outstanding efforts and results over the past 2 years.
Uni in control in the opening 20 Mins and deservedly went 1 up and also hit the post. Villa settled and equalised to go 1-1 at HT. Second half Villa mostly in control in an even contest with a goal a piece mid way through. Villa had a couple cleared off the line but all in all a draw a fair result to be honest.....Uni will be very hard to beat especially at home.
Congratulations to Tony Scalzi for his first game in charge after Rick stepped down to a playing role due to work commitments. Thanks to Ciucc for his outstanding efforts and results over the past 2 years.
- Dad's Army
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 10:03 am
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
This is exactly why overhead kicks should be penalized as dangerous play. Nobody can see what's behind them. If it's that high use your head.Lucas Leiva wrote:It was an attacking bicycle on goal, and I just didn't see the defender.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
[/quote]
Probably hasn't happened, cos contact was made with the ball and not the head.[/quote]
No one has answered my question......I am sure there has been a defender in the history of the game that has got their head in there. No grounds for a penalty in my opinion......Fcuk were getting soft.....Acccidents happen and people get hurt in contact sports,
it's just the way it is. :?
Probably hasn't happened, cos contact was made with the ball and not the head.[/quote]
No one has answered my question......I am sure there has been a defender in the history of the game that has got their head in there. No grounds for a penalty in my opinion......Fcuk were getting soft.....Acccidents happen and people get hurt in contact sports,
it's just the way it is. :?
- Dad's Army
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 10:03 am
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Bodø Glimt wrote:If you foul a defender why would it be a penalty?
what if he's pushed forward for a corner?
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Franco UnAmerican wrote:No one has answered my question......I am sure there has been a defender in the history of the game that has got their head in there. No grounds for a penalty in my opinion......shiraz were getting soft.....Acccidents happen and people get hurt in contact sports,
it's just the way it is. :?
It's been answered, if the contact was on the ball then it would only be a free kick if the ref deemed it to be dangerous play. So you wouldn't get a red for it.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
- Lucas Leiva
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:32 am
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
If I could jump that high I would! I only went for the bicycle because my momentum carried me away from the ball...it was just like Pele's in "Victory"!Bodø Glimt wrote:This is exactly why overhead kicks should be penalized as dangerous play. Nobody can see what's behind them. If it's that high use your head.Lucas Leiva wrote:It was an attacking bicycle on goal, and I just didn't see the defender.
Look, I scored one before, attempted numerous others, first time I went for one and hurt anyone (and I only ever attempt it if I think no-one is going to get hurt). On the flip side, I've been volleyed in the face going for a diving header before, but I didn't ask for volleys to be banned. I've been punched by a keeper attempting a clearance, but I didn't ask for punched clearances to be banned. I see many tackles end people's careers that go unpunished, but for an attempt on goal to cause this much discussion is ludicrous.
I understand everyone's opinion, appreciate and agree to an extent, but if you didn't see then it's a little hard to comment on this specific incident. It's a feature of the game that no-one wants to see disappear. What would everyone say if all of Peter Crouch's overhead goals were ruled out because of dangerous play?
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
No it hasn't............For the simple ones.Hawkesy wrote:Franco UnAmerican wrote:No one has answered my question......I am sure there has been a defender in the history of the game that has got their head in there. No grounds for a penalty in my opinion......shiraz were getting soft.....Acccidents happen and people get hurt in contact sports,
it's just the way it is. :?
It's been answered, if the contact was on the ball then it would only be a free kick if the ref deemed it to be dangerous play. So you wouldn't get a red for it.
Tell me when a shot on goal from a bicycle kick has been disallowed and been awarded a penalty/free kick?
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Lucas Leiva wrote:If I could jump that high I would! I only went for the bicycle because my momentum carried me away from the ball...it was just like Pele's in "Victory"!Bodø Glimt wrote:This is exactly why overhead kicks should be penalized as dangerous play. Nobody can see what's behind them. If it's that high use your head.Lucas Leiva wrote:It was an attacking bicycle on goal, and I just didn't see the defender.
Look, I scored one before, attempted numerous others, first time I went for one and hurt anyone (and I only ever attempt it if I think no-one is going to get hurt). On the flip side, I've been volleyed in the face going for a diving header before, but I didn't ask for volleys to be banned. I've been punched by a keeper attempting a clearance, but I didn't ask for punched clearances to be banned. I see many tackles end people's careers that go unpunished, but for an attempt on goal to cause this much discussion is ludicrous.
I understand everyone's opinion, appreciate and agree to an extent, but if you didn't see then it's a little hard to comment on this specific incident. It's a feature of the game that no-one wants to see disappear. What would everyone say if all of Peter Crouch's overhead goals were ruled out because of dangerous play?
Lucas....Your conscience should be clear....Do not respond to the sh1t stirrers.
Last edited by Steve#4 on Sat May 22, 2010 7:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Lucas Leiva wrote:If I could jump that high I would! I only went for the bicycle because my momentum carried me away from the ball...it was just like Pele's in "Victory"!Bodø Glimt wrote:This is exactly why overhead kicks should be penalized as dangerous play. Nobody can see what's behind them. If it's that high use your head.Lucas Leiva wrote:It was an attacking bicycle on goal, and I just didn't see the defender.
Look, I scored one before, attempted numerous others, first time I went for one and hurt anyone (and I only ever attempt it if I think no-one is going to get hurt). On the flip side, I've been volleyed in the face going for a diving header before, but I didn't ask for volleys to be banned. I've been punched by a keeper attempting a clearance, but I didn't ask for punched clearances to be banned. I see many tackles end people's careers that go unpunished, but for an attempt on goal to cause this much discussion is ludicrous.
I understand everyone's opinion, appreciate and agree to an extent, but if you didn't see then it's a little hard to comment on this specific incident. It's a feature of the game that no-one wants to see disappear. What would everyone say if all of Peter Crouch's overhead goals were ruled out because of dangerous play?
So you can jump that high with your feet but not your head? :?
As for the diving header, well if you put your feet at boot level then you have to expect boots to be there.
It sounds nothing like Pele's in Escape to Victory, he made contact with the ball, he had no defeders in the vicinity and most importantly HE SCORED!
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
- 5cougarsthanx
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:07 pm
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
A's
Southern Breakers 5 Adelaide Cougars 6
Wierdest game I have ever been involved in . We led 3-0 at half time. Scored in the second half to make it 4-0 ( I actually got on the scorers sheet- scored from a kick out) . Then Breakers came back to make it 4-3, then we scored another 2 to make it 6-3.. then when we thought it was all settled, they pegged back another 2! Too late in the end for the Breakers though, who must be commended for their fighting spirit and their will to keep running their guts out, no matter the result. Their pitch is like playing on carpet and their hospitality, fantastic... the only club I know of to bring a tray of food into the visiting teams changerooms after a game. In what might be a season for us where we will be battling with the cellar dwellers to stay up, these were 3 precious points we earnt today.
B's
Southern Breakers 4 Adelaide Cougars 3 (I think)
Southern Breakers 5 Adelaide Cougars 6
Wierdest game I have ever been involved in . We led 3-0 at half time. Scored in the second half to make it 4-0 ( I actually got on the scorers sheet- scored from a kick out) . Then Breakers came back to make it 4-3, then we scored another 2 to make it 6-3.. then when we thought it was all settled, they pegged back another 2! Too late in the end for the Breakers though, who must be commended for their fighting spirit and their will to keep running their guts out, no matter the result. Their pitch is like playing on carpet and their hospitality, fantastic... the only club I know of to bring a tray of food into the visiting teams changerooms after a game. In what might be a season for us where we will be battling with the cellar dwellers to stay up, these were 3 precious points we earnt today.
B's
Southern Breakers 4 Adelaide Cougars 3 (I think)
Last edited by 5cougarsthanx on Sat May 22, 2010 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CROYDON COUGARS SC Est 1999
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
You sure about that!Lucas Leiva wrote:first time I went for one and hurt anyone
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Sh1t StirrerHawkesy wrote:You sure about that!Lucas Leiva wrote:first time I went for one and hurt anyone
Re: Results Saturday 22/5
Franco UnAmerican wrote:Sh1t StirrerHawkesy wrote:You sure about that!Lucas Leiva wrote:first time I went for one and hurt anyone
who? me?
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".