2010 World cup SEEDING

[Nikos_Goumas]

Fifa wont confirm these seedings and pots until december 2, but this is the most likely pots after looking at fifa regulations n taking into considering geographic facts.

POT 1-Brazil, Spain, Argentina, France, England, Italy, Germany, South Africa
POT 2- Netherlands, Portugal, Denmark, Slovenia, Greece, Slovakia, Serbia, Switzerland
POT 3- USA, Mexico, Honduras, South Korea, North Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand
POT 4- Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Nigeria, Algeria


if this is the case we cannot have australia n new zealand in the same group,

however we could see ITALY, GREECE, AUSTRALIA in the same group which most people here in adelaide will get excited bout

Ideally for Australia i think this is the best group for them

South Africa
Slovenia
Australia
Nigeria

which is unlikely tho

[BADA BING]

ITALY, GREECE, AUSTRALIA & NETHERLANDS WOULD BE EVEN BETTER

[Red-4-Life]

do you want Australia to get out the group stage

[DOC]

seeding is shit, fair and simple, blatter takes it up the arse from platini, especially on wed night in paris...

[Inter_boy;)]

pot 4 seems stronger than pot 3 ?

anyway, what is it with everybody feeling the need to whine about seedings?

in my humble opinion, though it would be exciting, it would be irrational & unfair to have a group of Brazil, Spain, Argentina, Italy & another group of Honduras, New Zealand, Algeria, N Korea for example

just my opinion, not that is matters

but i would like to know why its not considered fair according to some ? if they can give me a compelling argument about why the 2nd group is good for football or how the 1st is just i would like to hear it, and perhaps ill change my mind

[The Kop]

pot 4 seems stronger than pot 3 ?

anyway, what is it with everybody feeling the need to whine about seedings?

in my humble opinion, though it would be exciting, it would be irrational & unfair to have a group of Brazil, Spain, Argentina, Italy & another group of Honduras, New Zealand, Algeria, N Korea for example

just my opinion, not that is matters

but i would like to know why its not considered fair according to some ? if they can give me a compelling argument about why the 2nd group is good for football or how the 1st is just i would like to hear it, and perhaps ill change my mind

its not really that hard to comprehend.
the pots 2-4 are not ranked so one cannot be 'stronger' than the other.

its just a form of grouping wouldnt make a single difference at all if they were around the other way.

only pot 1 are seeded nations. the other 3 pots are geographically/continentally alligned..............

[Hawkesy]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

[Nice One Cyril]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

What have you got against the Algerians?

[Il Duce]

in my humble opinion, though it would be exciting, it would be irrational & unfair to have a group of Brazil, Spain, Argentina, Italy & another group of Honduras, New Zealand, Algeria, N Korea for example

It would be no different to manchester united being drawn against Chelsea in the FA Cup whilst Hull get drawn with Bournemouth.

Luck of the draw... you still have to do the business on the park.

[ruud]

absolute joke that south africa is in pot 1...

[DOC]

absolute joke that south africa is in pot 1...

host nation always gets this, i think thats why in 2002 there were a couple of relly good groups as two host knocked two top seeds down

[Hawkesy]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

What have you got against the Algerians?

nothing against any of them, just picked the weakest teams from pots 2, 3 & 4.

[Paleon Patros Germanos]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

What have you got against the Algerians?

nothing against any of them, just picked the weakest teams from pots 2, 3 & 4.

And the weakest team from Pot 1.

[Salpigidis]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

i thought you were from england. you wont make KO stage witha group like that. England would struggle for 3rd

[Paleon Patros Germanos]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

i thought you were from england. you wont make KO stage witha group like that. England would struggle for 3rd

What are you smoking?

[The Magician]

Is this the same England that hasn't won anything for over 40 years?

[Salpigidis]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

i thought you were from england. you wont make KO stage witha group like that. England would struggle for 3rd

What are you smoking?

greece and australia would wip eng. they arent that good even tho all you watch is EPL. there is football outside of UK germano

[COLOSSUS]

And the weakest team from Pot 1.

Exactly what i was thinking, hilarious really

[Hawkesy]

And the weakest team from Pot 1.

Exactly what i was thinking, hilarious really

you either can't read, are a bit silly are on a wind up.

South Africa are in pot 1.

[Hawkesy]

England
greece
australia
algeria

PLEASE!!

i thought you were from england. you wont make KO stage witha group like that. England would struggle for 3rd

ha ha. Nice try!

[COLOSSUS]

And the weakest team from Pot 1.

Exactly what i was thinking, hilarious really

you either can't read, are a bit silly are on a wind up.

South Africa are in pot 1.

Oh no Hawkesy, we can read buddy dont worry about that Weve given South Africa the benefit of the doubt since they are playing on home soil which means Pot 1s weakest link is............... you know who

[Hawkesy]

you need better bait, i'm not as easy to catch as you and your mates are.

[ruud]

you need better bait, i'm not as easy to catch as you and your mates are.

just mention greece and collossus pops his head out

[Costanza Philosophy]

Sometimes North Cyprus is just as effective.

[COLOSSUS]

you need better bait, i'm not as easy to catch as you and your mates are.

bahahahaha, i wasnt baiting, im actually giving youmy opinion I dont need to go fishing on a forum, my fishing gear does perfectly well at sea thank you very much
Considering South Africa qualified for the tournament before you even played your 1st qualifying game, id say they are well positioned int that Pot to NOT be the weakest team which only leaves......................England

[Stitch This]

Would have been even better if Macedonia had qualified.

[COLOSSUS]

you need better bait, i'm not as easy to catch as you and your mates are.

just mention greece and collossus pops his head out

and everytime colossus replies, ruud pops his out What game we playing next ruud???

[Costanza Philosophy]

Would have been even better if Macedonia had qualified.

That would mean beating Norway

[COLOSSUS]

Would have been even better if Macedonia had qualified.

Well if there were such a country, i dont see why they couldnt if they went through the same process as everyone else, but you'll probably find there might be a few Macedonians in the Greek squad since Macedonia is in Greece

[Hawkesy]

you need better bait, i'm not as easy to catch as you and your mates are.

bahahahaha, i wasnt baiting, im actually giving youmy opinion I dont need to go fishing on a forum, my fishing gear does perfectly well at sea thank you very much
Considering South Africa qualified for the tournament before you even played your 1st qualifying game, id say they are well positioned int that Pot to NOT be the weakest team which only leaves......................England

who is the lowest ranked team in pot 1 and by how many places.