SAASL Rumours

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:02 pm

CAPSLOCK wrote:Interesting, are they playing any games in Pirie? Or all home games at Grange?

You didn't seriously believe that did you?

CAPSLOCK · Post by **CAPSLOCK** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:38 pm

Not sure. Just enquiring on what was happening. Surely someone out there knows the facts.

vigilante · Post by **vigilante** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:14 pm

rumour has it from Valetta road that two old time gossip queens (bigpond & RTF) have joined the fusc committee. Ga Pala has also joined on as coach liaison. Apparently his first move is to encourage a team from Port Pirie to enter the amateur league as he quite likes away trips there for some reason

OldRedback · Post by **OldRedback** » Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:48 pm

OldRedback wrote:
Cobweb wrote:**POST REMOVED BY MODERATOR**
Why?
What has Cobweb said?

Still no news on what happened here. Was it bad language/slanderous or saying something that people wouldn't like to hear or other people to know about?

Jean Claude · Post by **Jean Claude** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:26 am

All of the above!

Mike Hunt · Post by **Mike Hunt** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:52 am

Or quite possibly offended no-one but the moderator who edited it.

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:43 pm

OldRedback wrote:
OldRedback wrote:
Cobweb wrote:**POST REMOVED BY MODERATOR**
Why?
What has Cobweb said?
Still no news on what happened here. Was it bad language/slanderous or saying something that people wouldn't like to hear or other people to know about?

Slanderous

OldRedback · Post by **OldRedback** » Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:14 pm

Why what was the allegation?

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:25 am

OldRedback wrote:Why what was the allegation?

It was something a little bit personal about someone.

OldRedback · Post by **OldRedback** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:08 pm

Personal true? If it is true then it cannot be slanderous - can it? And if it is true then taking it off would be censorship of free speech wouldn't it?

Jean Claude · Post by **Jean Claude** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:40 pm

OldRedback wrote:Personal true? If it is true then it cannot be slanderous - can it? And if it is true then taking it off would be censorship of free speech wouldn't it?

WELCOME TO FOOTBALLNEWS.COM

Mike Hunt · Post by **Mike Hunt** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:56 pm

Jay Walking wrote:
OldRedback wrote:Why what was the allegation?
It was something a little bit personal about someone.

Who?

Chade · Post by **Chade** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:13 pm

OldRedback wrote:Personal true? If it is true then it cannot be slanderous - can it? And if it is true then taking it off would be censorship of free speech wouldn't it?

There's no such thing as free speech on a moderated internet forum...

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:26 pm

OldRedback wrote:Personal true? If it is true then it cannot be slanderous - can it? And if it is true then taking it off would be censorship of free speech wouldn't it?

It wasn't football related so no need for it to be on here. Not everyone wants their dirty laundry aired

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:28 pm

Mike Hunt wrote:
Jay Walking wrote:
OldRedback wrote:Why what was the allegation?
It was something a little bit personal about someone.
Who?

A non formite

De Voyeur · Post by **De Voyeur** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:50 am

Is there anything you don't know Jay?

Shouln't you be in Bali by now?

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:15 pm

East 17 wrote:Is there anything you don't know Jay?

Shouln't you be in Bali by now?

Lots of things I don't know. I only know useless information

Leave for Bali on Wednesday morning. I'm a bit nervous as Mr X is bringing his Makini.

Cobweb · Post by **Cobweb** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:57 pm

Been away a while!

Gee didn't think me reply would cause that much of a stir?????

Sorry, meee baaaaadd, just re read the topic heading SAASL RUMOURS!

My original question was obviously in the affirmative, therefore I should of posted it in the TRUMORS!

From now on I swear on oath that all my comments will be pure bulls#*t, lies and innuendo.......

marooned · Post by **marooned** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:00 pm

Cobweb your a bad man, a very bad man.

Mike Hunt · Post by **Mike Hunt** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:04 am

Cobweb wrote:From now on I swear on oath that all my comments will be pure bulls#*t, lies and innuendo.......

blue moon · Post by **blue moon** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:43 am

Cobweb wrote:Been away a while!

Gee didn't think me reply would cause that much of a stir?????

Sorry, meee baaaaadd, just re read the topic heading SAASL RUMOURS!

My original question was obviously in the affirmative, therefore I should of posted it in the TRUMORS!

From now on I swear on oath that all my comments will be pure bulls#*t, lies and innuendo.......

maybe you need to take a pill to chill out

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:17 am

Cobweb wrote:Been away a while!

Gee didn't think me reply would cause that much of a stir?????

Sorry, meee baaaaadd, just re read the topic heading SAASL RUMOURS!

My original question was obviously in the affirmative, therefore I should of posted it in the TRUMORS!

From now on I swear on oath that all my comments will be pure bulls#*t, lies and innuendo.......

It wasn't in relation to Football so why should it appear on here considering this is about SAASL Rumours?

It hasn't caused a stir, just no need to besmirch someones name on here.

OldRedback · Post by **OldRedback** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:37 pm

I reckon it has got more coverage and publicity by taking it off than it would have done if it was left on..............certainly I think more people are aware of it.

Robbo · Post by **Robbo** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:22 pm

OldRedback wrote:I reckon it has got more coverage and publicity by taking it off than it would have done if it was left on..............certainly I think more people are aware of it.

That's pretty far fetched from the bloke who has been pushing and pushing it since

Jay Walking · Post by **Jay Walking** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:49 pm

OldRedback wrote:I reckon it has got more coverage and publicity by taking it off than it would have done if it was left on..............certainly I think more people are aware of it.

So you do know what was said and what its about?

Cobweb · Post by **Cobweb** » Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:01 pm

Sorry for bringing it up Your Honour.

OldRedback · Post by **OldRedback** » Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:18 am

ROBBO wrote:
OldRedback wrote:I reckon it has got more coverage and publicity by taking it off than it would have done if it was left on..............certainly I think more people are aware of it.
That's pretty far fetched from the bloke who has been pushing and pushing it since

I didn't but it has a few people talking because of the interest it generated in being taken off and now I do know - just taking it off here doesn't mean that people don't talk about it and some people talk more than others and/or others can't keep their mouths shut.

Robbo · Post by **Robbo** » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:01 am

OldRedback wrote:
ROBBO wrote:
OldRedback wrote:I reckon it has got more coverage and publicity by taking it off than it would have done if it was left on..............certainly I think more people are aware of it.
That's pretty far fetched from the bloke who has been pushing and pushing it since
I didn't but it has a few people talking because of the interest it generated in being taken off and now I do know - just taking it off here doesn't mean that people don't talk about it and some people talk more than others and/or others can't keep their mouths shut.

You didn't ... REALLY ?? Coz nobody else on here said boo about the post being removed.

You know if that's the sort of crap you want posted on a public forum about ppl from various clubs then go right ahead, all that will happen is all parties will drag each other down to a very low level. So how about pulling your head in and moving on you twat?

terriblygifted · Post by **terriblygifted** » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:24 pm

Aldo Serena wrote:
kinghenrik wrote:ingle farm to sign up blue eagles trainer for next season. on a completely unrelated topic, registration numbers for ingle farm to break all previous records.
She left about halfway through the season for a full time job. If you have seen previous trainers at our club, we are just continuing on with our high standards.

That's my cousin you're talking about...do I need to snap you??

De Voyeur · Post by **De Voyeur** » Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:16 pm

terriblygifted wrote:
Aldo Serena wrote:
kinghenrik wrote:ingle farm to sign up blue eagles trainer for next season. on a completely unrelated topic, registration numbers for ingle farm to break all previous records.
She left about halfway through the season for a full time job. If you have seen previous trainers at our club, we are just continuing on with our high standards.
That's my cousin you're talking about...do I need to snap you??

Sucks to be you. Growing up having all of those inappropriate thoughts about your own flesh and blood. Have you ever tried counselling?

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact

SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours

Re: SAASL Rumours