U/16 SALISBURY

This forum is for discussion relating to junior football.

Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins

Post Reply
Suffolk 'N' Good
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:49 pm

U/16 SALISBURY

Post by Suffolk 'N' Good »

Come on boys another 8-1 defeat. Surely you can do better than this! :( :shock:
prefly
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:44 am

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by prefly »

Well that post really helped them
The Boss
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by The Boss »

The sad thing is that the 17's, who have had a good season will suffer next year at the hands of the 16's results.
In argument, truth always prevails finally; in politics, falsehood always.
Walter Landor
REDS
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:14 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by REDS »

The Boss wrote:The sad thing is that the 17's, who have had a good season will suffer next year at the hands of the 16's results.
why would that be?
prefly
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:44 am

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by prefly »

Well that's life, some 17's teams will benefit from their 16's staying up. Maybe the club should have supported the lads a bit more maybe bringing down some of those great 17's that were eligible, every other 'A' club does it. It seems to me the Northern clubs that have an E&D background don't seem to have that ruthless streak in them that the old fed clubs tend to have, I thought that was the right way to go but I'm not so sure now, It hasn't helped one of my lads teams this year. A or B does it really matter, most of the talented ones should be playing at least some games for the 19's or reserves next year. But if there are not many 17's eligible then the lads that will be playing next year for the 17's are the 16's this year and they only got themselves to blame. (if that makes any sense :oops: ) I think the seniors situation is the sad one for Salisbury this year a missed opportunity.

anyway that's my rant, getting to the end of the season, maybe a bit sick of it all
Killa Pass
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 698
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:10 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by Killa Pass »

prefly wrote:Well that's life, some 17's teams will benefit from their 16's staying up. Maybe the club should have supported the lads a bit more maybe bringing down some of those great 17's that were eligible, every other 'A' club does it. It seems to me the Northern clubs that have an E&D background don't seem to have that ruthless streak in them that the old fed clubs tend to have, I thought that was the right way to go but I'm not so sure now, It hasn't helped one of my lads teams this year. A or B does it really matter, most of the talented ones should be playing at least some games for the 19's or reserves next year. But if there are not many 17's eligible then the lads that will be playing next year for the 17's are the 16's this year and they only got themselves to blame. (if that makes any sense :oops: ) I think the seniors situation is the sad one for Salisbury this year a missed opportunity.

anyway that's my rant, getting to the end of the season, maybe a bit sick of it all
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: WTF prefly you are losing it mate
prefly
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:44 am

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by prefly »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: With the season Gawler have had yep you could be right :wink:
User avatar
TOPGUNJIMMYAUFC
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 11578
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:39 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by TOPGUNJIMMYAUFC »

wtf,


FIRE UPPPPPPPPP LADDS......FARRRR KEN!!
RADIO LALASEMENO
http://www.lalasemeno.gr

this has just changed my life............above link



dont use my name..

What has 100 legs & 4 teeth? The front row of the Collingwood cheer squad
The Wise Monkey
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:43 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by The Wise Monkey »

go you blues wrote:Come on boys another 8-1 defeat. Surely you can do better than this! :( :shock:
10 posts and 6 of them on the U16s, fantastic. I have a feeling you won't be getting too many votes for club person of the year.
User avatar
Lost For Words
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:31 am

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by Lost For Words »

:lol:
I just love laughing at people.
soccer heart
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 10:18 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by soccer heart »

Yeah, that’s right TB, think of your own situation, not what’s good for the club.

When the team only had 11 players 2 games in a row, did you help by putting your player on roster to miss a game down to play for the U16’s? No. So maybe instead of sniping on this forum, perhaps you should have approached the team and coaches to find out what’s going on and offered support.

Also, if your team is as good as you say it is, how come no U17 player has played up for the U19’s, when U16 and U15 players have been promoted to do so?

Don’t know how these people can take themselves soooo seriously, when some of them don’t know the first thing about the game they purport to love!!!!

To Prefly: good on you - great for someone to stand up for a bunch of kids having a hard time, and criticising those who don’t seem to be able to help themselves. Seems typical of the Salisbury spirit and character, obviously you have to use this forum instead of facing the people concerned and remain faceless and nameless.
prefly
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:44 am

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by prefly »

I have absolutely nothing to do with Salisbury. I was just responding to The Bosses gripe about the position that his lads team might be in next year. I don't think anyone values my opinion about football down at Salisbury, and to brutally honest I don't give a rats about them either, we have the same thing to worry about up at Gawler. 11 players for 2 weeks in a row "that's bloody luxury lad" :lol:
The Boss
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by The Boss »

soccer heart wrote:Yeah, that’s right TB, think of your own situation, not what’s good for the club.

When the team only had 11 players 2 games in a row, did you help by putting your player on roster to miss a game down to play for the U16’s? No. So maybe instead of sniping on this forum, perhaps you should have approached the team and coaches to find out what’s going on and offered support.

Also, if your team is as good as you say it is, how come no U17 player has played up for the U19’s, when U16 and U15 players have been promoted to do so?

Don’t know how these people can take themselves soooo seriously, when some of them don’t know the first thing about the game they purport to love!!!!

To Prefly: good on you - great for someone to stand up for a bunch of kids having a hard time, and criticising those who don’t seem to be able to help themselves. Seems typical of the Salisbury spirit and character, obviously you have to use this forum instead of facing the people concerned and remain faceless and nameless.
Soccerheart "newbie"

Perhaps you had better get your facts straight before you come on here and slag people.

Firstly, I stated a fact, there was no criticism of the team, It was not a dig at the 16's. Secondly, they will suffer too, not just the handful of 17's that are still eligible next year.

Also, if a team is short, surely it is their responsibility to make their position known and request players. It is not up to the other teams to check on them to see if they are ok.

Last of all, the 17's have helped out the 19's on numerous occasions when they were short.....because they asked. So I don't know where you got your information from.
In argument, truth always prevails finally; in politics, falsehood always.
Walter Landor
soccer heart
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 10:18 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by soccer heart »

TB, you previously stated, and I quote "The sad thing is that the 17's, who have had a good season will suffer next year at the hands of the 16's results."

And you say that you regards this as not being a criticism of the team.

My information came from the club - so either you are telling furfies, the coach is telling them, or the club heirarchy is telling them. After all, they are well aware of the results for the season and the injuries and illnesses involved, which have all gone unnoticed. Also, as the ONLY Division 1 side in the entire club, they have had no support from said club!!!!
The Boss
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by The Boss »

soccer heart wrote:TB, you previously stated, and I quote "The sad thing is that the 17's, who have had a good season will suffer next year at the hands of the 16's results."

And you say that you regards this as not being a criticism of the team.

My information came from the club - so either you are telling furfies, the coach is telling them, or the club heirarchy is telling them. After all, they are well aware of the results for the season and the injuries and illnesses involved, which have all gone unnoticed. Also, as the ONLY Division 1 side in the entire club, they have had no support from said club!!!!
You obviously have problems grasping the English language or the written word.
Nowhere did I state that the team was at fault or to blame, purely highlighted the fact that it was an unfortunate outcome for others as well.
Sure you can stack sides to win games but at the end of the day is that beneficial to the players that miss out or sit on the bench because a coach has decided to bring some guns in from another team? Everyone pays their hard earned money to see their child play and develop, not to miss a game because a coach wants to win so bad that he has to bring in half a dozen players. I've seen it happen and it turns ugly for everyone involved.

If you care so much about the club, perhaps you would like to explain to the 17's team why they were dropped into division 2 by FFSA after earning the right to be in dvision 1? Or is that another thing you didn't know?

There's nothing like going through a 5 month pre-season expecting to be in the A division and then 2 weeks before the season starts be informed that you have been dropped to the B division to make up numbers. All teams have their hard luck stories but we move on.

I think you have to look a bit deeper and get to the bottom of who is telling the "furfies"
In argument, truth always prevails finally; in politics, falsehood always.
Walter Landor
de uno
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by de uno »

I took that also as a snipe at the U16s, so maybe u need to watch your wording TB. Also TB if the team has ever been short it has drawn on the other players from the club for support who are eligible.
REDS
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:14 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by REDS »

I see the 16's had a win oh and the 17's didnt have a game this week.
The Boss
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by The Boss »

oh yes they did!!!

FFSA just slow in putting up results.
South Adelaide result from over a week ago still not up yet?
In argument, truth always prevails finally; in politics, falsehood always.
Walter Landor
REDS
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:14 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by REDS »

so how did the 17's go then TB? and against who?
User avatar
Green_Manalishi
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:34 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by Green_Manalishi »

The Boss wrote:oh yes they did!!!

FFSA just slow in putting up results.
South Adelaide result from over a week ago still not up yet?
Did the Junior delegates put the scores in? I think Dimitri needs to see them from both delegates before updating the web site.
Occasionally available in blue
The Boss
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 361
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by The Boss »

REDS wrote:so how did the 17's go then TB? and against who?
2 all against Cobras
In argument, truth always prevails finally; in politics, falsehood always.
Walter Landor
REDS
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:14 pm

Re: U/16 SALISBURY

Post by REDS »

The Boss wrote:
REDS wrote:so how did the 17's go then TB? and against who?
2 all against Cobras
3rd v 4th - would have been an interesting game I would think?
Post Reply