Results 26/7
Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins
- Green_Manalishi
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2029
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:34 pm
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:45 pm
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
Last edited by White Hart Lane on Tue Dec 13, 2016 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
referee was way out of whack, he even told west adelaide players to shut up and tried to pick a fight with one of the west adelaide spectators. not what we should be seeing from our so called "match officials"what a goal wrote:U16s
Modbury 4 West Adelaide 1 (modbury 0 west adelaide 1 at HALF TIME)
A Great defensive display by modbury today.
Modbury got revenge on WA after losing 6-0 afew weeks back. Modbury Took there chances while west adelaide only had minor chances mainly the referee the blame for that. Referee was not under full control of the game giving 2 soft red cards to west adelaide, 1 in the second half and one after the game following a bit of trouble.
Was a firey game from both teams. Was not good to see an all in brawl between players on the pitch and players off the field. WA coach was sent off for constantly abusing the referee.
Welldone to modbury on beating a top side in WA.
Re: Results 26/7
Good to see West Adelaide on here posting their usual SHITE.... They beat Modbury 6-0 in the 16's a few weeks ago and we heard how bad the Modbury defence was etc etc etc.... This week they lose to the poor Modbury defence 4-1 and the ref is to blame ????????? Not the Parents and Coach who were constantly abusing the Ref and anyone else near by.... And when they were losing , they decided to start a brawl on the pitch, which you also lost.More severely than the scoreline... HA HAHA.
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
well said duaneSID wrote:Good to see West Adelaide on here posting their usual SHITE.... They beat Modbury 6-0 in the 16's a few weeks ago and we heard how bad the Modbury defence was etc etc etc.... This week they lose to the poor Modbury defence 4-1 and the ref is to blame ????????? Not the Parents and Coach who were constantly abusing the Ref and anyone else near by.... And when they were losing , they decided to start a brawl on the pitch, which you also lost.More severely than the scoreline... HA HAHA.
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
why would we blame the loss on our parents or coaches and we did not start the brawl, the ferals did like they usually do. when you and your team get into the top half of the table then you can start talking yourselves upSID wrote:Good to see West Adelaide on here posting their usual SHITE.... They beat Modbury 6-0 in the 16's a few weeks ago and we heard how bad the Modbury defence was etc etc etc.... This week they lose to the poor Modbury defence 4-1 and the ref is to blame ????????? Not the Parents and Coach who were constantly abusing the Ref and anyone else near by.... And when they were losing , they decided to start a brawl on the pitch, which you also lost.More severely than the scoreline... HA HAHA.
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
And when you stop dropping players down from 17s ect you would be in the bottom half of the table. Modbury put you in your place today as you didnt drop 17s. And dont say you didnt drop players last time because half of the squad this week was not the same as previous game.FIWC Champ wrote:why would we blame the loss on our parents or coaches and we did not start the brawl, the ferals did like they usually do. when you and your team get into the top half of the table then you can start talking yourselves upSID wrote:Good to see West Adelaide on here posting their usual SHITE.... They beat Modbury 6-0 in the 16's a few weeks ago and we heard how bad the Modbury defence was etc etc etc.... This week they lose to the poor Modbury defence 4-1 and the ref is to blame ????????? Not the Parents and Coach who were constantly abusing the Ref and anyone else near by.... And when they were losing , they decided to start a brawl on the pitch, which you also lost.More severely than the scoreline... HA HAHA.
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
last time we played modbury we had 4 injuries so we had to replace the injured players with players from the 17s, they were all 1993 born so i no wrong doingwhat a goal wrote:And when you stop dropping players down from 17s ect you would be in the bottom half of the table. Modbury put you in your place today as you didnt drop 17s. And dont say you didnt drop players last time because half of the squad this week was not the same as previous game.FIWC Champ wrote:why would we blame the loss on our parents or coaches and we did not start the brawl, the ferals did like they usually do. when you and your team get into the top half of the table then you can start talking yourselves upSID wrote:Good to see West Adelaide on here posting their usual SHITE.... They beat Modbury 6-0 in the 16's a few weeks ago and we heard how bad the Modbury defence was etc etc etc.... This week they lose to the poor Modbury defence 4-1 and the ref is to blame ????????? Not the Parents and Coach who were constantly abusing the Ref and anyone else near by.... And when they were losing , they decided to start a brawl on the pitch, which you also lost.More severely than the scoreline... HA HAHA.
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
why would we blame the loss on our parents or coaches and we did not start the brawl, the ferals did like they usually do. when you and your team get into the top half of the table then you can start talking yourselves up[/quote]
And when you stop dropping players down from 17s ect you would be in the bottom half of the table. Modbury put you in your place today as you didnt drop 17s. And dont say you didnt drop players last time because half of the squad this week was not the same as previous game.[/quote]
last time we played modbury we had 4 injuries so we had to replace the injured players with players from the 17s, they were all 1993 born so i no wrong doing[/quote]
Well they obviously proved the difference last time. Im not against dropping players but without help from your U17s you cant do jack shit in the league. Like today 8th in the league beat 3rd in the league quite comfortabley in the end.
And when you stop dropping players down from 17s ect you would be in the bottom half of the table. Modbury put you in your place today as you didnt drop 17s. And dont say you didnt drop players last time because half of the squad this week was not the same as previous game.[/quote]
last time we played modbury we had 4 injuries so we had to replace the injured players with players from the 17s, they were all 1993 born so i no wrong doing[/quote]
Well they obviously proved the difference last time. Im not against dropping players but without help from your U17s you cant do jack shit in the league. Like today 8th in the league beat 3rd in the league quite comfortabley in the end.
Re: Results 26/7
the players the U16s West Adelaide team dropped last time they played Modbury were U19s. I know this coz 2 of the U19s players dropped, scored 5 of the goals. It is posted on the West Adelaide website so u cannot deny it and make excuses.
When West Adelaide win they come on here and pay everyone out but when they lose they have to make excuses.
When West Adelaide win they come on here and pay everyone out but when they lose they have to make excuses.
Re: Results 26/7
Trying to call other teams ferals. Something about a frying pan calling the kettle black.FIWC Champ wrote:why would we blame the loss on our parents or coaches and we did not start the brawl, the ferals did like they usually do. when you and your team get into the top half of the table then you can start talking yourselves upSID wrote:Good to see West Adelaide on here posting their usual SHITE.... They beat Modbury 6-0 in the 16's a few weeks ago and we heard how bad the Modbury defence was etc etc etc.... This week they lose to the poor Modbury defence 4-1 and the ref is to blame ????????? Not the Parents and Coach who were constantly abusing the Ref and anyone else near by.... And when they were losing , they decided to start a brawl on the pitch, which you also lost.More severely than the scoreline... HA HAHA.
Well done Modbury.
Who?... Who is but a form, followed by the function of what... And what I am, is a man in a mask!
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
And yes maybe the ref was a bit of a clown today but none of modburys goals were caused by the referee so stop making your stupid excuses and calling modbury ferals because you west adelaide boys are bad losers
Re: Results 26/7
I play in the U16s league and i have played Modbury twice this season, once in the cup. They are a good team and definetely not ferals. they play the game properly and there were no bad or late tackles.
Yes, west adelaide are bad losers. if City win their catch up game they will go 5 points clear of west adelaide
Yes, west adelaide are bad losers. if City win their catch up game they will go 5 points clear of west adelaide
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
you must of played a different Modbury team to the one we played today and west adelaide aren't bad losers when we lose the occasional game after been beaten by a better team we will admit it, we got beaten by para hills 3-2 last week fair and square. but todays game was a different story modbury players cant say that they didnt jump in with bad tackles and as with the ref even the modbury players should agree that he was a dud and had no idea about the sportmanu17 wrote:I play in the U16s league and i have played Modbury twice this season, once in the cup. They are a good team and definetely not ferals. they play the game properly and there were no bad or late tackles.
Yes, west adelaide are bad losers. if City win their catch up game they will go 5 points clear of west adelaide
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:34 pm
Re: Results 26/7
FIWC Champ wrote:referee was way out of whack, he even told west adelaide players to shut up and tried to pick a fight with one of the west adelaide spectators. not what we should be seeing from our so called "match officials"what a goal wrote:U16s
Modbury 4 West Adelaide 1 (modbury 0 west adelaide 1 at HALF TIME)
A Great defensive display by modbury today.
Modbury got revenge on WA after losing 6-0 afew weeks back. Modbury Took there chances while west adelaide only had minor chances mainly the referee the blame for that. Referee was not under full control of the game giving 2 soft red cards to west adelaide, 1 in the second half and one after the game following a bit of trouble.
Was a firey game from both teams. Was not good to see an all in brawl between players on the pitch and players off the field. WA coach was sent off for constantly abusing the referee.
Welldone to modbury on beating a top side in WA.
What did you say to the ref now Big Fella
Now that's what I call high quality H2O.
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
I said what u just read waterboyThe Waterboy wrote:FIWC Champ wrote:referee was way out of whack, he even told west adelaide players to shut up and tried to pick a fight with one of the west adelaide spectators. not what we should be seeing from our so called "match officials"what a goal wrote:U16s
Modbury 4 West Adelaide 1 (modbury 0 west adelaide 1 at HALF TIME)
A Great defensive display by modbury today.
Modbury got revenge on WA after losing 6-0 afew weeks back. Modbury Took there chances while west adelaide only had minor chances mainly the referee the blame for that. Referee was not under full control of the game giving 2 soft red cards to west adelaide, 1 in the second half and one after the game following a bit of trouble.
Was a firey game from both teams. Was not good to see an all in brawl between players on the pitch and players off the field. WA coach was sent off for constantly abusing the referee.
Welldone to modbury on beating a top side in WA.
What did you say to the ref now Big Fella
Re: Results 26/7
im pretty sure i played the same modbury coz we played them twice and they had the same players...
they must have been pissed when u dropped players to beat them
they must have been pissed when u dropped players to beat them
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
if you were paying attention i already addressed that issue scroll through the topic and find the answermanu17 wrote:im pretty sure i played the same modbury coz we played them twice and they had the same players...
they must have been pissed when u dropped players to beat them
Re: Results 26/7
FIWC Champ..... Your West Adelaide players must have done something bad to get red carded, where was the game played??
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
we played at modbury's junior ground, first red card was a second yellow. the second yellow was for appealing for a freekick after the player got a studs up slide tackle from behind and the referee waved play on. the first yellow in the first half was for saying to the referee "just watch the hands in the back on that player ref" and that warranted a yellow card according to the referee because he didn't like players appealing or suggesting anything to him. the second red card was after the game, one of our players called the ref a disgrace, he is off to europe for 2 months so its no big loss
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
If you were listening mate you would of heard the player tht got the second yellow saying to the referee your a dirty prick. You just dont call referees that. Have some respect.FIWC Champ wrote:we played at modbury's junior ground, first red card was a second yellow. the second yellow was for appealing for a freekick after the player got a studs up slide tackle from behind and the referee waved play on. the first yellow in the first half was for saying to the referee "just watch the hands in the back on that player ref" and that warranted a yellow card according to the referee because he didn't like players appealing or suggesting anything to him. the second red card was after the game, one of our players called the ref a disgrace, he is off to europe for 2 months so its no big loss
And your calling us ferals
These days referees dont take shit so you have to watch what you say and move on in the game.
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
lol yeah we will have to move on and start focusing on our opponents next weekmanu17 wrote:ok then. prob a soft ref lol
bad luck
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
the ref would of showed him a second yellow regardless, he wouldn't accept anyone appealing for a freekick or saying anything to him (swearing or not)what a goal wrote:If you were listening mate you would of heard the player tht got the second yellow saying to the referee your a dirty prick. You just dont call referees that. Have some respect.FIWC Champ wrote:we played at modbury's junior ground, first red card was a second yellow. the second yellow was for appealing for a freekick after the player got a studs up slide tackle from behind and the referee waved play on. the first yellow in the first half was for saying to the referee "just watch the hands in the back on that player ref" and that warranted a yellow card according to the referee because he didn't like players appealing or suggesting anything to him. the second red card was after the game, one of our players called the ref a disgrace, he is off to europe for 2 months so its no big loss
And your calling us ferals
These days referees dont take cabernet so you have to watch what you say and move on in the game.
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Results 26/7
thats why you dont abuse referees mate, you get red cards.FIWC Champ wrote:the ref would of showed him a second yellow regardless, he wouldn't accept anyone appealing for a freekick or saying anything to him (swearing or not)what a goal wrote:If you were listening mate you would of heard the player tht got the second yellow saying to the referee your a dirty prick. You just dont call referees that. Have some respect.FIWC Champ wrote:we played at modbury's junior ground, first red card was a second yellow. the second yellow was for appealing for a freekick after the player got a studs up slide tackle from behind and the referee waved play on. the first yellow in the first half was for saying to the referee "just watch the hands in the back on that player ref" and that warranted a yellow card according to the referee because he didn't like players appealing or suggesting anything to him. the second red card was after the game, one of our players called the ref a disgrace, he is off to europe for 2 months so its no big loss
And your calling us ferals
These days referees dont take cabernet so you have to watch what you say and move on in the game.
Thats right move on to next week
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:23 pm
Re: Results 26/7
when you get screwed over the period of a full match its pretty hard for even the best players to restrain themselves