White City 17s

[Kim Kallstrom]

The team is a disgrace really. Week in, week out they never have cards for their players and always make excuses why they dont have them. And they are just as bad on the field, in their last match three of their players picked up red cards! One of them for (allegedly) kicking the referee.

[Unknown]

The team is a disgrace really. Week in, week out they never have cards for their players and always make excuses why they dont have them. And they are just as bad on the field, in their last match three of their players picked up red cards! One of them for (allegedly) kicking the referee.

LAUGH MY FUCKING ASS OFF.

i play for White City and i have a list of things i would like to say:

*THIS WEEK AGAINST ENFIELD WE MADE SURE EVERY PLAYER HAD THEIR CARD! which they all did so that was no problem

* 3 PLAYERS DID NOT GET SENT OFF, 2 PLAYERS GOT SENT OFF

THE SENDING OFF OF THE FIRST PLAYER WAS FOR YELLING OUT WHILE ON THE PITCH (said WHAAATTT!) got a yellow for bad sportsmanship after an opposition supporter questioned an offside decision, then when approaching the referee which was cleary the biggest joke i have ever seen, did not recieve an appropriate response and therefor said F OFF every1 i cant hear, THE REF THEN DECIDED TO GIVE HIM A SECOND YELLOW (and he was trying to help the ref control the situation,) FROM THERE the situation went terribly wrong and the ref was abused by 2-3 White City players, one player practically walked himself off the pitch after telling the ref that hes an f*ing wa*ker. THAT I BELIEVE = 2 YELLOWS(RED) and A STRAIGHT RED.

* AGAINST TOROS WE HAD PLAYERS CARDS FOR 11 PLAYERS OUT OF 13 AND NEVER DID WE CLEARLY GET ASKED FOR A CARD CHECK!!!!!!


now what else would you like to know my good friend?


can u answer me WHY THE LINESMAN entered the field of play, literally made one of our players leave the pitch for having tape on his ear. also why the cheating scum called that first goal offside after it clearly wasnt.?

yeee BUT WE DONT GO AND CRY TO THE FFSA like you'se do

[Green_Manalishi]

You forgot to mention the bit about having two Number 10s on the pitch (or was that only after one of them was snet off?) and the former Enfield player playing for WC who hasn't been cleared to play for WC yet.

Or the language used by WC team officials towards their players as they escorted them off the pitch in front of junior players and their families.

2-3 players abusing the ref - it looked like half the team and pretty nasty (though I'd agree it didn't look like any contact was made) from where I was watching - a fnarken disgrace. Lucky for WC the ref didn't abandon the game.

Shame because there were obviously some White City players out there who just wanted to get on and play football.

[Unknown]

You forgot to mention the bit about having two Number 10s on the pitch (or was that only after one of them was snet off?) and the former Enfield player playing for WC who hasn't been cleared to play for WC yet.

Or the language used by WC team officials towards their players as they escorted them off the pitch in front of junior players and their families.

2-3 players abusing the ref - it looked like half the team and pretty nasty (though I'd agree it didn't look like any contact was made) from where I was watching - a fnarken disgrace. Lucky for WC the ref didn't abandon the game.

Shame because there were obviously some White City players out there who just wanted to get on and play football.

ye fair enough but once again it looks like u heard it from the horses mouth, it wasnt 2 number 10's it was a player who wanted to wear number 9 but instead took number 18 and wore 18 shorts, then the game was about to start and some1 made him change into the 9 because that was on the team sheet, mean while another player that was late took 9 and swaped it for the 18. thats how 2 players were recorded with wearing a 9 shirt... ONLY because and Enfield official made him change his shirt to 9 ( as it was on the team sheet , and then made the guy with number 9 wear 18 without changing it back to 18.)

as for the enfield player playing for white city, i have no idea wat your talking about. or who your talking about

there was a kid from the 15s named Sed that came to play for some reason but im sure hes played for the 15s at white city previously.

[Željko Jurin]

You forgot to mention the bit about having two Number 10s on the pitch (or was that only after one of them was snet off?) and the former Enfield player playing for WC who hasn't been cleared to play for WC yet.

Or the language used by WC team officials towards their players as they escorted them off the pitch in front of junior players and their families.

2-3 players abusing the ref - it looked like half the team and pretty nasty (though I'd agree it didn't look like any contact was made) from where I was watching - a fnarken disgrace. Lucky for WC the ref didn't abandon the game.

Shame because there were obviously some White City players out there who just wanted to get on and play football.

ye fair enough but once again it looks like u heard it from the horses mouth, it wasnt 2 number 10's it was a player who wanted to wear number 9 but instead took number 18 and wore 18 shorts, then the game was about to start and some1 made him change into the 9 because that was on the team sheet, mean while another player that was late took 9 and swaped it for the 18. thats how 2 players were recorded with wearing a 9 shirt... ONLY because and Enfield official made him change his shirt to 9 ( as it was on the team sheet , and then made the guy with number 9 wear 18 without changing it back to 18.)
as for the enfield player playing for white city, i have no idea wat your talking about. or who your talking about

there was a kid from the 15s named Sed that came to play for some reason but im sure hes played for the 15s at white city previously.

can you just explain that again, but slowly and in english this time

[Green_Manalishi]

ye fair enough but once again it looks like u heard it from the horses mouth...

Apart from now being totally confused, I was going on what I thought I saw from the grandstand re the No 10s.......but then my eyesight isnt quite what it used to be

[Unknown]

na aha ok lol... there was 1 number 10 im 100000% certain of that.

Person A: was 1 number 9 with ( number 18 shorts)
and Person B: was number 18( with plain white shorts)

Person A wanted to wear number 9 but was given 18 because there were number 18 shorts to match.

Person B then took number 9 and wore the normal shorts

Team Manager made a mistake and put down Person A down as 9 and Person B down as 9

When Person A was warming up on the pitch, he was told to replace his shirt with Person B

leaving him with 9 and person B with 18

so now if someone hadnt changed that on the team sheet thats a different story, but there was never 2 number 9's . Maybe a 19 and a 9 but yee

:? anyway

[rabbit]

Oh, alright then, that's cleared that up....... :? :? :? :? :?

[portobello]

White City have been caught before playing over age players. Their juniors are a joke.

[rabbit]

White City have been caught before playing over age players. Their juniors are a joke.

[mail man]

White City have been caught before playing over age players. Their juniors are a joke.

Their 17's have played overage players again this year. They also play unregistered players. Even a player who plays 19's at another club on Saturdays has fronted up for White City's 17's this season under a different name of course.

[Željko Jurin]

White City have been caught before playing over age players. Their juniors are a joke.

Their 17's have played overage players again this year. They also play unregistered players. Even a player who plays 19's at another club on Saturdays has fronted up for White City's 17's this season under a different name of course.

I do not believe it

[Željko Jurin]

na aha ok lol... there was 1 number 10 im 100000% certain of that.

Person A: was 1 number 9 with ( number 18 shorts)
and Person B: was number 18( with plain white shorts)

Person A wanted to wear number 9 but was given 18 because there were number 18 shorts to match.

Person B then took number 9 and wore the normal shorts

Team Manager made a mistake and put down Person A down as 9 and Person B down as 9

When Person A was warming up on the pitch, he was told to replace his shirt with Person B

leaving him with 9 and person B with 18

so now if someone hadnt changed that on the team sheet thats a different story, but there was never 2 number 9's . Maybe a 19 and a 9 but yee

:? anyway

That's in english, now slowly please

[Unknown]

hows that?

[NUFC]

i renmember playing white city in under 15s and they had players from their team driving to the game

[Kim Kallstrom]

i renmember playing white city in under 15s and they had players from their team driving to the game

well, there you go. my point is proven

[sir Alex]

white city are, and always have been the most corrupt club in the junior ranks,
pity, but too true

[LEVSKI]

White city cheating and everybody know that.