Liverpool! wrote:Regarding Playford West Adelaide result in penalty shoot out:
Playford goal West miss
Playford miss West goal
Playford miss West miss
Playford miss West goal
Playford goal West goal disallowed (kicked before whistle)
Golden Goal:
Playford goal West miss PLAYFORD WINS MATCH
(Referee mistakenly called for second Playford shot (goal, but irrelevant to outcome)
Disallowed goal was not clearly announced which possibly led to dispute.
We're in gods name did you find the dissalowed penalty from?? The was not one penalty dissalowed in the shootout, There was a penalty dissalowed during normal time for being kicked before the whistle so did u just shove this penalty in the shootout and take it out of normal time?
Well this is getting bigger than Ben Hur
Without ammunition, the Air Force is just an expensive flying club
In the 13s match between Campbelltown and Raiders, the Raiders trainer was screaming out 'take them out' when the team was losing 6-0.
I was disgusted when I heard that coming from their bench, no one wants to condone those actions on the playing field especially at such a young age.
Sad if true
You said trainer, is that the coach, young guy with black hair, or someone else ???
The Raiders trainer is actually a woman! [/quote]
"Fuzzy Wuzzy was a woman!"
I think we are discussing me.
Please if you are going to speak about wot I was saying, dont misquote or misrepresent me. I was actually saying 'to take IT out' which our team knows as meaning take the ball out of play - sidelined. I hope that makes sense? To be honest, if you were really that concerned, I was available for you to come over and speak with me about what you felt you had heard and my 'disgusting behaviour'. Im not unapproachable (as half the U13 team are bigger than I am!!) or nasty. And being the Club's Junior Registrar, I most certainly wouldnt be encouraging any of our Club's teams to condone vindictive or nasty behaviour as you're accusing me of.
In regards to any response from John Walker. Unfortunately, he wouldnt be in a position to respond as he wasnt there. I can offer that our Junior Club President was sitting on our bench and can vouch for what was yelled out to the players and my 'supposed disgusting behaviour' as well as our Club President being present at the game. Anyone who knows me would know that I would not be encouraging that sort of play. I would encourage the team to play aggressively and not be pushed off the ball but NOT to take ANY player out. Im into fair play and the entire club would support me in this.
I hope this clears this matter up? Any other queries, please PM and I would be more than happy to chat with you.
Filikis Eterias wrote:Simple, the referee admitted to miscounting. West lead after 5 penalties each by 3 goals to 2. FFSA will ultimately rule in Wests favour.
If it was the other way around we would have graciously accepted defeat.
No need to make a big deal out of it. The young female referee was never intimidated by our officials as alleged by a previous poster. Once she checked her book she saw her mistake.
Well well, West Adelaide not awarded the match. Seems the ref did not 'make a mistake' then? Messy result to have a replay. Having seen the ref approach the pitch from her changeroom flanked by 2 West Adelaide officials shouting 'we've talked to the ref, she's changing the result' it looked pretty intimidating to me..... Still,good luck to Playford who were seriously underestimated by West Adelaide. I also believe that it was only West Adelaide players who stooped to behaviour that resulted in yellow cards.... bit desperate were you?
Last edited by londoner on Sun May 24, 2009 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Liverpool! wrote:Regarding Playford West Adelaide result in penalty shoot out:
Playford goal West miss
Playford miss West goal
Playford miss West miss
Playford miss West goal
Playford goal West goal disallowed (kicked before whistle)Golden Goal:
Playford goal West miss PLAYFORD WINS MATCH
(Referee mistakenly called for second Playford shot (goal, but irrelevant to outcome)
Disallowed goal was not clearly announced which possibly led to dispute.
Cannot be disallowed, must be re-taken if this scenario in fact happened the way you say... I smell a re-match on the cards...
Spot on Rooboy,a penalty cant be disallowed and there was definetely no penalty disallowed after both teams took their 5 penaltys.Everyone that was present saw the result clear as day,and that was 3-2 to West Adelaide.If the last 5th penalty was disallowed for whatever reason ,there would of been a re-take.....but their wasnt!The West Adel boys celebrated their win,but were called back to the half way line confusing the hell out of everyone.The referee actually thought that Wests took the first penalty not Playford and thats why all this confusion.Graciously she admitted her mistake but was under severe protest by the Playford coach and Team manager.Anyway whats done is done and there will be a rematch between the 2 sides because of the protest put forward by Playford.In my eyes if a team wins 3-2 out of 5 penaltys each,its a win!Is there anyone who disagrees with this FIFA ruling?
Last edited by 1908 on Mon May 25, 2009 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Liverpool! wrote:Regarding Playford West Adelaide result in penalty shoot out:
Playford goal West miss
Playford miss West goal
Playford miss West miss
Playford miss West goal
Playford goal West goal disallowed (kicked before whistle)Golden Goal:
Playford goal West miss PLAYFORD WINS MATCH
(Referee mistakenly called for second Playford shot (goal, but irrelevant to outcome)
Disallowed goal was not clearly announced which possibly led to dispute.
Cannot be disallowed, must be re-taken if this scenario in fact happened the way you say... I smell a re-match on the cards...
Spot on Rooboy,a penalty cant be disallowed and there was definetely no penalty disallowed after both teams took their 5 penaltys.Everyone that was present saw the result clear as day,and that was 3-2 to West Adelaide.If the last 5th penalty was disallowed for whatever reason ,there would of been a re-take.....but their wasnt!The West Adel boys celebrated their win,but were called back to the half way line confusing the hell out of everyone.The referee actually thought that Wests took the first penalty not Gawler and thats why all this confusion.Graciously she admitted her mistake but was under severe protest by the Gawler coach and Team manager.Anyway whats done is done and there will be a rematch between the 2 sides because of the protest put forward by Playford.In my eyes if a team wins 3-2 out of 5 penaltys each,its a win!Is there anyone who disagrees with this FIFA ruling?
londoner wrote:Gawler coach? At the Playford v West Adelaide game? Wot?
very very sorry guys,i actually meant Playford and not Gawler.My mistake.Sorry if i caused any confusion to anyone,i really am but i,m sure most people knew what i was on about.
rabbit wrote:SOMEONE MUST KNOW SURELY......FEDERATION MADE THE DECISION YESTERDAY APPARENTLY............ :?
The decision has been made there will be a replay but a date has not been decided
The whisper is that an appeal has been lodged with the FFA. Don't know which team has lodged the appeal but this is getting a bit silly if true. Tossing a coin would be cheaper.
soccer_mum wrote:I have heard from a reliable source that Playford are, and have always been happy to except the FFSA decision regardless of their outcome.
ummm a few soccermums on here so what has the final outcome of this game been ?????
who is going to meet the mighty parra in the next round ?????? :? :?
soccer_mum wrote:I have heard from a reliable source that Playford are, and have always been happy to except the FFSA decision regardless of their outcome.
ummm a few soccermums on here so what has the final outcome of this game been ?????
who is going to meet the mighty parra in the next round ?????? :? :?
all i can say is the next round should be harder with most sides being in the A,s
good luck to all still in it
soccer_mum wrote:I have heard from a reliable source that Playford are, and have always been happy to except the FFSA decision regardless of their outcome.
ummm a few soccermums on here so what has the final outcome of this game been ?????
who is going to meet the mighty parra in the next round ?????? :? :?
At this rate it will be the Bridgeston and Rastric Brass Band
Without ammunition, the Air Force is just an expensive flying club