CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

This forum is for the discussion of amateur league football.

Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins

User avatar
lefty
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:24 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by lefty »

Gee on one side weve got the Vale wanting to play the Gardens and on the other the Downs supporting the Gardens :lol: :lol:
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Missing Post Count »

legga wrote:if the Saturday Teams were good enough they could of been playing in the Chicko if they won the cup.
You could say the same for Vale.
User avatar
nugget66
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by nugget66 »

Bodø Glimt wrote:
legga wrote:if the Saturday Teams were good enough they could of been playing in the Chicko if they won the cup.
You could say the same for Vale.
Bodø can't you read? The Vale didn't know the league put the Cichanowski Shield on the end of the Champions of Champions game simple, my club wasn't aware & all clubs I spoken to weren't. If there going to change it notify all clubs at the start of the season !!!
That's all... It dosnt matter what anyone thinks wether it should stay the same or not cause we won't have a say in it anyway
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Missing Post Count »

The season hasn't kicked off yet :wink:
mr bigglesworth
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:08 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by mr bigglesworth »

brooksy7 wrote:firstly i can see both sidfes of the ledger here,but from the vales point of view it this game shld be gdns v vale as stated its been lge winners(sun) v cup winners for so long.Now i dont hav a problem with changing it but do so b4 the season or champions game has been played not after the game reason being tht as much as u give an effort ur preparation is not the same as if u no uve got to win the game.I think its fair to say tht teams in the past while happy to win the coc game the main prize is the lge and the party for a month afterwards therefore the rite to play in the chiko shield.And billynomates to suggest the vale r being like 7 yr olds prob says more about ur mentality then ours as the vale dont make excuses for losing!!!

Goodluck to all teams in all divs both sat and sun lge.Remember do whts rite for the game not ur own club.
i never actually said the vale were being like 7 yr olds as i never posted any excuse from the vale, i simply pointed out that the excuse that nugget said the vale gave him sounded like the kind've excuse a 7 yr old would give.
mr bigglesworth
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:08 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by mr bigglesworth »

Bodø Glimt wrote:The season hasn't kicked off yet :wink:
i believe they mean the start of last season not this season.
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Missing Post Count »

Hence the wink !
mr bigglesworth
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:08 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by mr bigglesworth »

Bodø Glimt wrote:Hence the wink !
oh so u were trying to be funny. got ya, u keep pluggin away there tiger.
User avatar
marooned
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 6:09 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by marooned »

Personally I think it should be Gardens v Vale. But I was at the meeting last year when we were told that it would now be changed to Champion v Champion vs Cup Winner. I dont recall seeing a rep from Gardens or the Vale that night.

I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.

Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd

In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.

We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
http://www.edsc.com.au

"It's not how good you are, but how bad you want it"
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Missing Post Count »

marooned wrote:No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.
I have to say the biggest crowds I saw last season did involve sunday teams (Bosna v Elizabeth Vale) and your mob broght half of Elizabeth to Usc Lions :D
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Missing Post Count »

marooned wrote:We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner.
That's great if there is one league.
User avatar
nugget66
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by nugget66 »

marooned wrote:Personally I think it should be Gardens v Vale. But I was at the meeting last year when we were told that it would now be changed to Champion v Champion vs Cup Winner. I dont recall seeing a rep from Gardens or the Vale that night.

I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.

Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd

In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.

We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
The reason why sunday clubs have bigger crowds is because most are 20yrs older than saturday clubs,

I was at the meeting marooned but musn't have been paying attention ...again!!!

I agree with marooned, keep it the same as it's been for 25yrs... it will cost our club about $5,000.00...

So dose anyone really know who's playing against the Gardens?
User avatar
swannsong
Technical Director
Technical Director
Posts: 30004
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by swannsong »

marooned wrote:Personally I think it should be Gardens v Vale. But I was at the meeting last year when we were told that it would now be changed to Champion v Champion vs Cup Winner. I dont recall seeing a rep from Gardens or the Vale that night.

I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.

Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd

In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.

We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
What's with the...
Image
Last edited by swannsong on Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
User avatar
nugget66
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by nugget66 »

Nice photo :shock: we can all edit swanny but that's just not cricket!!!
Last edited by nugget66 on Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
swannsong
Technical Director
Technical Director
Posts: 30004
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by swannsong »

Fair enough nugget
Image
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
The Roo
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:55 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by The Roo »

I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
User avatar
nugget66
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by nugget66 »

R :oops: :oops: you need better bait :lol:
User avatar
Rodent
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1415
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:08 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Rodent »

nugget66 wrote:R :oops: :oops: you need better bait :lol:

Nugget your not supposed to fish in these waters.....even if you are using Cheese as bait !!!
Every Rat has his day !!
Left Right Out
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:56 am

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Left Right Out »

At the end of the day its a Trial game! Yes it would be nice to be in it and win it BUT who cares.

And

Whats with the discussion?? The Amateur league runs the competition NOT Lefty, Nugget, Rodent or LRO.

The Gardens are Playing the Wanderers (aint gonna change)

Why dont Gardens play there reserves against Wanderers at 3pm BUT before that at 1pm play your First team VS The Vale!!
User avatar
Redders
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:19 am

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Redders »

The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
You werent there the year before when Stirling(sat div1 champs) got pantsed by the downs 6-0?
User avatar
swannsong
Technical Director
Technical Director
Posts: 30004
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by swannsong »

The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
You only played the Vale !
Image
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
John Cena
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2814
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 7:24 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by John Cena »

redders wrote:
The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
You werent there the year before when Stirling(sat div1 champs) got pantsed by the downs 6-0?


you werent there when the man walked on the moon....lol............what a stupid post..........were you there reders when the wanderers pumped the sunday div 1 team,,,,,lol
User avatar
lefty
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:24 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by lefty »

Left Right Out wrote:At the end of the day its a Trial game! Yes it would be nice to be in it and win it BUT who cares.

And

Whats with the discussion?? The Amateur league runs the competition NOT Lefty, Nugget, Rodent or LRO.

The Gardens are Playing the Wanderers (aint gonna change)

Why dont Gardens play there reserves against Wanderers at 3pm BUT before that at 1pm play your First team VS The Vale!!
Why is it a trial game Im sure any player in the amateur league would like to win some silverware regardless. Hard for you to appreciate it at Gully cause theyve never been in the Chick Sheild :lol:

Dont care who we play as long as we win :D
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Missing Post Count »

lefty wrote:Don't care who we play as long as we win :D
That's the attitude any player should go in with.
Left Right Out
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:56 am

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Left Right Out »

It is a trial game mate, yes people like winning BUT its not the ultimate prize. If you dont care who you play why right on this forum about it? Anyway your the Chairman of the club, organise the comittee and the BBQ and leave the soccer side of it to others! :lol: Yes you are correct Gully hasnt played in one...YET! But I have how many have you played in? :wink: Gardens are looking good this year from what Ive heard, Steve is doing a great job, good luck for the season!
User avatar
robinfriday10
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2234
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by robinfriday10 »

cant do the treble without the chicken cup
things happen for a reason
User avatar
lefty
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:24 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by lefty »

Left Right Out wrote:It is a trial game mate, yes people like winning BUT its not the ultimate prize. If you dont care who you play why right on this forum about it? Anyway your the Chairman of the club, organise the comittee and the BBQ and leave the soccer side of it to others! :lol: Yes you are correct Gully hasnt played in one...YET! But I have how many have you played in? :wink: Gardens are looking good this year from what Ive heard, Steve is doing a great job, good luck for the season!
Isnt that what forums are about no different to talking sh..t at the bar.
As Chairman you should be involved in everything unlike coaches :wink: . Hope you last long enough at Gully to get into the Chick Shield mate and my playing career doesnt compare to yours I admit that.
Everyones doing a great job at the club :D
User avatar
Jay Walking
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7408
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Jay Walking »

It shouldn't be about crowd numbers, it should be about who earnt the right to play in it. I think Cup Winner v Champions of Champions is the fairest way with the Cup winner hosting the event.
User avatar
Fresh Football
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 802
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:20 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by Fresh Football »

swannsong wrote:
The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
You only played the Vale !
The Vale were the best team the Sunday league produced last season - won the league apparently...
Adelaide Wanderers
2005 COLLEGIATE CUP CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 A
2006 DIVISIONAL CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 B
2008 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 1 A
2008 CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS
2013 CHALLENGE CUP QUARTER FINALISTS
http://www.adelaidewanderers.com
User avatar
nugget66
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:56 pm

Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?

Post by nugget66 »

The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
SCARED? :clown:

Wanderers or the Vale it dosn't matter to us... BRING E'M ON!
Post Reply