CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Gee on one side weve got the Vale wanting to play the Gardens and on the other the Downs supporting the Gardens
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
You could say the same for Vale.legga wrote:if the Saturday Teams were good enough they could of been playing in the Chicko if they won the cup.
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Bodø can't you read? The Vale didn't know the league put the Cichanowski Shield on the end of the Champions of Champions game simple, my club wasn't aware & all clubs I spoken to weren't. If there going to change it notify all clubs at the start of the season !!!Bodø Glimt wrote:You could say the same for Vale.legga wrote:if the Saturday Teams were good enough they could of been playing in the Chicko if they won the cup.
That's all... It dosnt matter what anyone thinks wether it should stay the same or not cause we won't have a say in it anyway
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:08 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
i never actually said the vale were being like 7 yr olds as i never posted any excuse from the vale, i simply pointed out that the excuse that nugget said the vale gave him sounded like the kind've excuse a 7 yr old would give.brooksy7 wrote:firstly i can see both sidfes of the ledger here,but from the vales point of view it this game shld be gdns v vale as stated its been lge winners(sun) v cup winners for so long.Now i dont hav a problem with changing it but do so b4 the season or champions game has been played not after the game reason being tht as much as u give an effort ur preparation is not the same as if u no uve got to win the game.I think its fair to say tht teams in the past while happy to win the coc game the main prize is the lge and the party for a month afterwards therefore the rite to play in the chiko shield.And billynomates to suggest the vale r being like 7 yr olds prob says more about ur mentality then ours as the vale dont make excuses for losing!!!
Goodluck to all teams in all divs both sat and sun lge.Remember do whts rite for the game not ur own club.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:08 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
i believe they mean the start of last season not this season.Bodø Glimt wrote:The season hasn't kicked off yet
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:08 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
oh so u were trying to be funny. got ya, u keep pluggin away there tiger.Bodø Glimt wrote:Hence the wink !
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Personally I think it should be Gardens v Vale. But I was at the meeting last year when we were told that it would now be changed to Champion v Champion vs Cup Winner. I dont recall seeing a rep from Gardens or the Vale that night.
I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.
Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd
In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.
We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.
Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd
In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.
We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
I have to say the biggest crowds I saw last season did involve sunday teams (Bosna v Elizabeth Vale) and your mob broght half of Elizabeth to Usc Lionsmarooned wrote:No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
That's great if there is one league.marooned wrote:We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner.
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
The reason why sunday clubs have bigger crowds is because most are 20yrs older than saturday clubs,marooned wrote:Personally I think it should be Gardens v Vale. But I was at the meeting last year when we were told that it would now be changed to Champion v Champion vs Cup Winner. I dont recall seeing a rep from Gardens or the Vale that night.
I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.
Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd
In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.
We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
I was at the meeting marooned but musn't have been paying attention ...again!!!
I agree with marooned, keep it the same as it's been for 25yrs... it will cost our club about $5,000.00...
So dose anyone really know who's playing against the Gardens?
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
What's with the...marooned wrote:Personally I think it should be Gardens v Vale. But I was at the meeting last year when we were told that it would now be changed to Champion v Champion vs Cup Winner. I dont recall seeing a rep from Gardens or the Vale that night.
I dont agree with this at all. I think it should be Sunday Div 1 winner Vs Cup winner. No disrespect to Sat teams but you dont bring a crowd with you.
Gardens v Wanderers = 400 crowd
Gardens v Vale = 1000+ crowd
In the two years we won the champion of champions trophy the St Peters crowd would have been less than 50 and against Stirling roughly the same.
We must liken this match to the Charity Shield in England. Cup winner v league winner. End of story. If Sat teams want in then win the cup.
Last edited by swannsong on Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Nice photo we can all edit swanny but that's just not cricket!!!
Last edited by nugget66 on Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Fair enough nugget
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
nugget66 wrote:R you need better bait
Nugget your not supposed to fish in these waters.....even if you are using Cheese as bait !!!
Every Rat has his day !!
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:56 am
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
At the end of the day its a Trial game! Yes it would be nice to be in it and win it BUT who cares.
And
Whats with the discussion?? The Amateur league runs the competition NOT Lefty, Nugget, Rodent or LRO.
The Gardens are Playing the Wanderers (aint gonna change)
Why dont Gardens play there reserves against Wanderers at 3pm BUT before that at 1pm play your First team VS The Vale!!
And
Whats with the discussion?? The Amateur league runs the competition NOT Lefty, Nugget, Rodent or LRO.
The Gardens are Playing the Wanderers (aint gonna change)
Why dont Gardens play there reserves against Wanderers at 3pm BUT before that at 1pm play your First team VS The Vale!!
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
You werent there the year before when Stirling(sat div1 champs) got pantsed by the downs 6-0?The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
You only played the Vale !The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
Southern Knights SC - 2024 - Celebrating 30 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
redders wrote:You werent there the year before when Stirling(sat div1 champs) got pantsed by the downs 6-0?The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
you werent there when the man walked on the moon....lol............what a stupid post..........were you there reders when the wanderers pumped the sunday div 1 team,,,,,lol
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Why is it a trial game Im sure any player in the amateur league would like to win some silverware regardless. Hard for you to appreciate it at Gully cause theyve never been in the Chick SheildLeft Right Out wrote:At the end of the day its a Trial game! Yes it would be nice to be in it and win it BUT who cares.
And
Whats with the discussion?? The Amateur league runs the competition NOT Lefty, Nugget, Rodent or LRO.
The Gardens are Playing the Wanderers (aint gonna change)
Why dont Gardens play there reserves against Wanderers at 3pm BUT before that at 1pm play your First team VS The Vale!!
Dont care who we play as long as we win
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
That's the attitude any player should go in with.lefty wrote:Don't care who we play as long as we win
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:56 am
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
It is a trial game mate, yes people like winning BUT its not the ultimate prize. If you dont care who you play why right on this forum about it? Anyway your the Chairman of the club, organise the comittee and the BBQ and leave the soccer side of it to others! Yes you are correct Gully hasnt played in one...YET! But I have how many have you played in? Gardens are looking good this year from what Ive heard, Steve is doing a great job, good luck for the season!
- robinfriday10
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
cant do the treble without the chicken cup
things happen for a reason
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
Isnt that what forums are about no different to talking sh..t at the bar.Left Right Out wrote:It is a trial game mate, yes people like winning BUT its not the ultimate prize. If you dont care who you play why right on this forum about it? Anyway your the Chairman of the club, organise the comittee and the BBQ and leave the soccer side of it to others! Yes you are correct Gully hasnt played in one...YET! But I have how many have you played in? Gardens are looking good this year from what Ive heard, Steve is doing a great job, good luck for the season!
As Chairman you should be involved in everything unlike coaches . Hope you last long enough at Gully to get into the Chick Shield mate and my playing career doesnt compare to yours I admit that.
Everyones doing a great job at the club
- Jay Walking
- Team Manager
- Posts: 7408
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:13 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
It shouldn't be about crowd numbers, it should be about who earnt the right to play in it. I think Cup Winner v Champions of Champions is the fairest way with the Cup winner hosting the event.
- Fresh Football
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:20 pm
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
The Vale were the best team the Sunday league produced last season - won the league apparently...swannsong wrote:You only played the Vale !The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
Adelaide Wanderers
2005 COLLEGIATE CUP CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 A
2006 DIVISIONAL CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 B
2008 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 1 A
2008 CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS
2013 CHALLENGE CUP QUARTER FINALISTS
http://www.adelaidewanderers.com
2005 COLLEGIATE CUP CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 A
2006 DIVISIONAL CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 B
2008 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 1 A
2008 CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS
2013 CHALLENGE CUP QUARTER FINALISTS
http://www.adelaidewanderers.com
Re: CICHANOWSKI SHIELD. Parafield Gardens V ?
SCARED?The Roo wrote:I think everyone is just scared that the Sunday league will be made to look rubbish again just as it was in the Champion of Champions...
Wanderers or the Vale it dosn't matter to us... BRING E'M ON!