torres---->arsenal
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
- delfino_1936
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:25 am
- El Pibe D'Oro
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 1:38 pm
- delfino_1936
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:25 am
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:46 pm
Ronaldo you really are a silly boy. The gunners will generat more revenue from Emirates being sold out than old trafford!! thats a fact with every ticket 20% more than Man U and nearly twice the corporate facilities. Secondly we are privately owned and last time i checked mr Glazer had to borrow $650,000,000 to buy your club!! thats some pretty hefty repayments. So please dont go worrying about the gunners and there money problems.
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:46 pm
torres- reyes switch just about tied up!
and now mascherano is being heavily linked to join soon.
arsenal had the greatest profit of any english club last year.
stadium is paid for via the selling of bonds which is a british first. corporate and spectator faacilities mean the armoury can compete with the barca, manure etc transfer cash wise in the very near future. so your all fuc ked.
and now mascherano is being heavily linked to join soon.
arsenal had the greatest profit of any english club last year.
stadium is paid for via the selling of bonds which is a british first. corporate and spectator faacilities mean the armoury can compete with the barca, manure etc transfer cash wise in the very near future. so your all fuc ked.
reyes only wants 2 go 2 real madrid... athletico have offered money cause they know reyes wants 2 leave... y would torres join arsenal when he knocked back both milan clubs... IF hes goin anywhere its united, but i rkn he will stay for anotha season with Atletico// the way we r playin this season we dun need a striker, we need anotha midfielder
as 4 young javier maschenerio, i aint heard 2 much on him goin 2 gunners, although there is increase specualtion, as there has been 4 ages, that united will step in for him after bayern munich's stubborness with owen hargreaves
as 4 young javier maschenerio, i aint heard 2 much on him goin 2 gunners, although there is increase specualtion, as there has been 4 ages, that united will step in for him after bayern munich's stubborness with owen hargreaves
MUFCBOY you are so full of s.hit, every deal arsenal supposedly has is either no good or the player is actually going to go to Man Utd. Then when you talk up a transfer of a player to Man Utd and it doesn't happen you shutup about it...
ronaldo07 - once again you are an i.diot. It was a statistic that Arsenal made the most money of all premier league clubs last season, not something that is just being guessed.
Another thing, Man Utd 70000+ stadium, thats no good when you can't fill it, what was it, 54,000 record attendance just the other day vs. Fulham. Where as Emirates stadium sold out and filled up with 65,000 capacity vs. Aston Villa.
ronaldo07 - once again you are an i.diot. It was a statistic that Arsenal made the most money of all premier league clubs last season, not something that is just being guessed.
Another thing, Man Utd 70000+ stadium, thats no good when you can't fill it, what was it, 54,000 record attendance just the other day vs. Fulham. Where as Emirates stadium sold out and filled up with 65,000 capacity vs. Aston Villa.
hey 7 heres sum figures u can go shuv up ur a$$ from both man utds and arsenals last home games....
Manchester United vs Fulham - Attendance: 75,115
Arsenal vs Aston Villa - Emirates Stadium 60,023
Thats the official attendance
as for Arsenals transfers i jst finished reading Wengers comments about A.Madrids offer for Reyes(on soccernet.com) and there was no mention of Torres, thats why i posted what i did.
But anyways take a look at the figures 15,000+ less people
Manchester United vs Fulham - Attendance: 75,115
Arsenal vs Aston Villa - Emirates Stadium 60,023
Thats the official attendance
as for Arsenals transfers i jst finished reading Wengers comments about A.Madrids offer for Reyes(on soccernet.com) and there was no mention of Torres, thats why i posted what i did.
But anyways take a look at the figures 15,000+ less people
- Judge Judy
- Technical Director
- Posts: 35566
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 7:55 pm
by the way i bought young theo walcott in football manager... hes only 17 and is playin a few games for me... clubs keep offering me the dosh
and in regards to the transfers... if man utd dont sign em in real life, then i jst sign em in fm!
ive bought messi, kompany, maschenero and torres
beat liverpool in the league by 1 point... won fa cup vs newcastle 6-0.. but knocked out in the qtrs to liverpool 3-2 aggregate... cisse rips it up... btw how the fkuc does everton make it 2 the semis of cl?lol
and in regards to the transfers... if man utd dont sign em in real life, then i jst sign em in fm!
ive bought messi, kompany, maschenero and torres
beat liverpool in the league by 1 point... won fa cup vs newcastle 6-0.. but knocked out in the qtrs to liverpool 3-2 aggregate... cisse rips it up... btw how the fkuc does everton make it 2 the semis of cl?lol
- Judge Judy
- Technical Director
- Posts: 35566
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 7:55 pm
xabi wrote:hrmm i still don't get it, perhaps you could draw a picture for me?7 wrote:xabi, thats easily figured, man utd's old trafford has 76000+ capacity, where as arsenal's emirates stadium is 60000. Therefore Man utd can fit more people, thats not so hard to understand.
you see xabi, 1 of these hold 1 person. Old Trafford have 75000 of these, which = 75000 people.
on the other hand, emirates stadium have 60000 of these. which means it can have 60000 people sitting in them.
therefore, old trafford 75000 seats in theory should hold more than emirates 60000 seats. keeping in mind 1 seat per person.
therefore 75000>60000.....old trafford>emirates in terms of capacity.
hope this helps 0_0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
xabi wrote:hrmm i still don't get it, perhaps you could draw a picture for me?7 wrote:xabi, thats easily figured, man utd's old trafford has 76000+ capacity, where as arsenal's emirates stadium is 60000. Therefore Man utd can fit more people, thats not so hard to understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ray Parlour
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2317
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 9:18 pm
who friggin cares..
as long as arsenal or man utd beat chelski to the title ill be happy..
yes man utd hav a bigger stadium, but arsenal chose to make it 60,000, they couldv made it 100,000 if they wanted, but they have more premium seating and boxes than united thus even though it may be smaller, they make alot more money out of it...
arsenal are in london, united in manchester, totally different markets...
as long as arsenal or man utd beat chelski to the title ill be happy..
yes man utd hav a bigger stadium, but arsenal chose to make it 60,000, they couldv made it 100,000 if they wanted, but they have more premium seating and boxes than united thus even though it may be smaller, they make alot more money out of it...
arsenal are in london, united in manchester, totally different markets...
http://www.fastfootball.net - live football news & scores from around the world in one fast loading page
*NHS has announced that all sperm banks in Manchester & West London will close over the next few days as all the wankers will be in Moscow
- The one and only
- Star Player
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm