Under 17's Leading Goal Scorer?

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:25 am

I wonder who is the Under 17's leading goal scorer for the year so far?

stargazer · Post by **stargazer** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:03 pm

strikerzebra wrote:I think its that Jordan Lesiuk guy from Adelaide City.. hes a great player think hes scored 14 goals or so, just I hate that Athanasios Mantopooulous guy from Adelaide City. . I think hes gay? well thats what he told me anyway.

Stick to scoring goals son!

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:58 pm

Whats the point of the referee recording the goals if theres no golden boot away anyway?

Nova · Post by **Nova** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:03 pm

Is this what happens when cousins marry

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:34 pm

yeh greeks marry there cousins.. but I'm not related to the guy.

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:11 am

There is a couple of lads down at Noarlunga K.Maclean and S.Reed that have scored a few goals for the season. Maclean has 16 for the season and Reed has 15.

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:42 pm

The One wrote:There is a couple of lads down at Noarlunga K.Maclean and S.Reed that have scored a few goals for the season. Maclean has 16 for the season and Reed has 15.

Thats under 17 b's? goals are alot more easier to come by in the lower divisions though. ..

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:30 pm

fair point. Im not disrespecting the Div "A" teams but i have seen a couple of games in the cup between div "A" and div"B" teams and there hasnt been much difference, birks only lost to city 2-0, playford thrashed blue eagles 7-0 and noarlunga only lost 2-1 to campbelltown. i also hear that the noarlunga 17's beat panthers 17's 3-1. So some of the results show that the difference is not that great between the 2 divisions. But thats only my opinion and weather it is a valid 1 or not you decide.

BillShankly · Post by **BillShankly** » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:49 pm

dont think there is a massive gap, playford have been very impressive and they would be right up there if they were in the 'a' division, birks and city was a tight close game, and with white city beating para hills in the cup, the gap isnt that big at all.

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:00 pm

[quote="BillShankly"]dont think there is a massive gap, playford have been very impressive and they would be right up there if they were in the 'a' division, birks and city was a tight close game, and with white city beating para hills in the cup, the gap isnt that big at all.[/quote]

I'm sure there were some "interesting" factors that shaped the results of some of those games you mention. Why didn't White City turn up for their Cup game on Sunday!!?? I've seen Adelaide City play this year and Birkalla and in my opinion there IS a massive difference in the quality of the two teams. Funny things happen in cup rounds don"t they!!!!

Cruyff #14 · Post by **Cruyff #14** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:46 pm

White city players are all cup tied becasue of injury in 19s and 23s at the time so all players had to move up. WC 17s could probly beat any 17s A team. They did beat para hills in cup

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:23 pm

[quote="cevape"]White city players are all cup tied becasue of injury in 19s and 23s at the time so all players had to move up. WC 17s could probly beat any 17s A team. They did beat para hills in cup[/quote]

Not without help from the 19's they couldn't!

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:37 pm

sc1 wrote:
BillShankly wrote:dont think there is a massive gap, playford have been very impressive and they would be right up there if they were in the 'a' division, birks and city was a tight close game, and with white city beating para hills in the cup, the gap isnt that big at all.
I'm sure there were some "interesting" factors that shaped the results of some of those games you mention. Why didn't White City turn up for their Cup game on Sunday!!?? I've seen Adelaide City play this year and Birkalla and in my opinion there IS a massive difference in the quality of the two teams. Funny things happen in cup rounds don"t they!!!!

Adelaide city dominated the game vs birkala just couldn't finish on the day, not to mention the wet pitch with just about gale force winds on the day.

Vale · Post by **Vale** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:44 pm

The One wrote:fair point. Im not disrespecting the Div "A" teams but i have seen a couple of games in the cup between div "A" and div"B" teams and there hasnt been much difference, birks only lost to city 2-0, playford thrashed blue eagles 7-0 and noarlunga only lost 2-1 to campbelltown. i also hear that the noarlunga 17's beat panthers 17's 3-1. So some of the results show that the difference is not that great between the 2 divisions. But thats only my opinion and weather it is a valid 1 or not you decide.

Campbelltown played the worst game I have seen this year against Noarlunga and still should have scored at least 2 more goals. Noarlunga's only scoring opportunity was from a penalty which confused both teams as to why it was given. In my opinion the top A sides might tend to switch off slightly mentally when playing B teams and B teams tend to lift when playing A sides. I think there is a big difference between the top A sides and the top B sides especially in strength and skill level. But that only my opinion.

Vale · Post by **Vale** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:21 pm

BillShankly wrote:dont think there is a massive gap, playford have been very impressive and they would be right up there if they were in the 'a' division, birks and city was a tight close game, and with white city beating para hills in the cup, the gap isnt that big at all.

Playford U17B would be the only team that should probably be in the A division this year, but unfortunately their U15A of last year sealed their fate by finishing LAST thus relegating them to the B div this year.

As far as White City U17C team goes, I still can not believe they could not gather 11 eligable players to turn up and have a kick in a quarter final cup game. There must be at least 20 other U17 teams who would have jumped at the chance to play this game.

Cruyff #14 · Post by **Cruyff #14** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:40 pm

White city 17s always have players dropped from 19s because they do not have enough players. Most of the time the 15s are pushed up to play. It happens in every club.

Vale · Post by **Vale** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:15 pm

cevape wrote:White city 17s always have players dropped from 19s because they do not have enough players. Most of the time the 15s are pushed up to play. It happens in every club.

I know of one U17 team that has more than enough players, but will always drop 19s when they come across top 5 sides.
Played them this year at --- Park and could not believe what I saw. There were 6 regular U17 players sitting on the bench making way for the u19 players. I wonder what message that sends to those kids sitting on the bench.
U19 players that have their name on the team sheet in a cup game are automatically cup tied and it would be a shame to see a team lose a game for playing cup tied players.

gulf · Post by **gulf** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:30 pm

strikerzebra wrote:Whats the point of the referee recording the goals if theres no golden boot away anyway?

to confirm the result written at the bottom of the team sheet

giggs · Post by **giggs** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:31 pm

strikerzebra i think you need to grow up buddy. you sound extremely big headed. for starters it doesnt matter whether your in the a league or the b league if you have scored a decent amount of goals you are doing well, goals dont come easier in the b league. and i have watched your 17's play 4 times this year and you's are nothing special, yous cant put 2 passes together. so grow up buddy and get your head outta ya a#!e

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:39 pm

giggs wrote:strikerzebra i think you need to grow up buddy. you sound extremely big headed. for starters it doesnt matter whether your in the a league or the b league if you have scored a decent amount of goals you are doing well, goals dont come easier in the b league. and i have watched your 17's play 4 times this year and you's are nothing special, yous cant put 2 passes together. so grow up buddy and get your head outta ya a#!e

sure man, when we play a good game we are the best team in the league. . and when we play shit we are one of the worst. Just look at the ladder at the end of the season, city will be no 1.

giggs · Post by **giggs** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:45 pm

GROW UP!!! if you win the league then you can say you are the best in the league but until then dont make an idiot out of yourself. and if you do win no one like's a cocky winner

Post by **Randoman** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:08 pm

strikerzebra = jordan lesuik?

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:22 pm

RandomRanger wrote:strikerzebra = jordan lesuik?

RandomRanger = michael jackson?

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:07 pm

Hey strikerzebra...how did you go today against Para Hills...learn to use your brain mate...not your mouth!!!

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:13 pm

sc1 wrote: Hey strikerzebra...how did you go today against Para Hills...learn to use your brain mate...not your mouth!!!

we lost? I give credit to para hills they played a good game

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:27 pm

Dignified answer. Very sporting. What sort of game was it..end to end no doubt?

strikerzebra · Post by **strikerzebra** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:39 pm

sc1 wrote:Dignified answer. Very sporting. What sort of game was it..end to end no doubt?

I scored the 1st goal putting us up 1-0, they got the next 3 goals due to poor defensive decisions on our behalf then we got a penalty and the game was 3-2 with about 5 minutes to go.

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:50 pm

Thanks mate..good luck rest of season

Vale · Post by **Vale** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:16 pm

strikerzebra wrote:
sc1 wrote:Dignified answer. Very sporting. What sort of game was it..end to end no doubt?
I scored the 1st goal putting us up 1-0, they got the next 3 goals due to poor defensive decisions on our behalf then we got a penalty and the game was 3-2 with about 5 minutes to go.

I was at the game and para hills played well and deserved to win.Unfortunately Adelaide City and Para Hills had one of their players sent off and both will miss the next game.

povman_2009 · Post by **povman_2009** » Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:56 am

Striker Zebra wins the good sportsman award for the week.

I have waited a long time to see someone admit the other team played well and deserved their win.

Congratulations on learning a very important lesson in life, it is not whether you win or lose but how you play the game.

Long live good sportsmanship

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact

Under 17's Leading Goal Scorer?

Under 17's Leading Goal Scorer?

Re: Under 17's Leading Goal Scorer?

scorer

Re: scorer

17's

Re: 17's

17's

Re: 17's