Champions league final
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:34 pm
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
- ComeOnYouBlues
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:52 pm
- FerrariTifosi27
- Star Player
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:48 pm
Re: Champions league final
and still 0-0 after 120mins, then united to win 1-0 on penalties hahahaBianchi9Amaranto wrote:A scoreless 0-0 draw
- FerrariTifosi27
- Star Player
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:48 pm
Re: Champions league final
Right about thatRed & Blue Army wrote:and still 0-0 after 120mins, then united to win 1-0 on penalties hahahaBianchi9Amaranto wrote:A scoreless 0-0 draw
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:25 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:15 pm
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:34 pm
- DON HALA MADRID
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 10:25 pm
Re: Champions league final
if Chelsea wins, in no way, shape or form are the 'The Champions of Europe' in my eyes.. they've fooking bludged this whole CL against shitte house teams and only have to beat Liverpool and Man U who they play anyway, like 4 times a season!!
Man U on the other hand, if they win then they can wear that title, beating great teams is what Champions really are.
let's look at the resume's...
Manchester United - played/beaten
Roma*(class)*
Sporting*(class)*
Dynamo Kiev (crap)
Lyon*(class)*
Roma *(again)*
Barcelona*(class)*
now for Chelsea's
Schalke (average)
Rosenborg (crap)
Valencia (crap)
Olympiacos (crap)
Fenerbahce (crap)
LIVERPOOL... for the 16th time this season
Man U on the other hand, if they win then they can wear that title, beating great teams is what Champions really are.
let's look at the resume's...
Manchester United - played/beaten
Roma*(class)*
Sporting*(class)*
Dynamo Kiev (crap)
Lyon*(class)*
Roma *(again)*
Barcelona*(class)*
now for Chelsea's
Schalke (average)
Rosenborg (crap)
Valencia (crap)
Olympiacos (crap)
Fenerbahce (crap)
LIVERPOOL... for the 16th time this season
Re: Champions league final
for starters Fenerbahce are better than Sporting and LyonHala Madrid wrote:if Chelsea wins, in no way, shape or form are the 'The Champions of Europe' in my eyes.. they've fooking bludged this whole CL against shitte house teams and only have to beat Liverpool and Man U who they play anyway, like 4 times a season!!
Man U on the other hand, if they win then they can wear that title, beating great teams is what Champions really are.
let's look at the resume's...
Manchester United - played/beaten
Roma*(class)*
Sporting*(class)*
Dynamo Kiev (crap)
Lyon*(class)*
Roma *(again)*
Barcelona*(class)*
now for Chelsea's
Schalke (average)
Rosenborg (crap)
Valencia (crap)
Olympiacos (crap)
Fenerbahce (crap)
LIVERPOOL... for the 16th time this season
secondly the only reason why Chelsea arent rightful champions of Europe in my eyes is cause they didnt win the 2007 EPL title and so shouldnt be in the comp.
They have as much right to play Champions League this season as Lazio do
having said that I hope they demolish Man U, not that Ill be watching
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Re: Champions league final
I agree with everything you have written here.il duce wrote:secondly the only reason why Chelsea arent rightful champions of Europe in my eyes is cause they didnt win the 2007 EPL title and so shouldnt be in the comp.
They have as much right to play Champions League this season as Lazio do
having said that I hope they demolish Man U, not that Ill be watching
- FerrariTifosi27
- Star Player
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:48 pm
Re: Champions league final
Same here.....the best was in 2003, I'll never forget that moment. Also when Milan made the final last year. If an Italian club or two make the finals then I'd definitely watch.il duce wrote:for starters Fenerbahce are better than Sporting and LyonHala Madrid wrote:if Chelsea wins, in no way, shape or form are the 'The Champions of Europe' in my eyes.. they've fooking bludged this whole CL against shitte house teams and only have to beat Liverpool and Man U who they play anyway, like 4 times a season!!
Man U on the other hand, if they win then they can wear that title, beating great teams is what Champions really are.
let's look at the resume's...
Manchester United - played/beaten
Roma*(class)*
Sporting*(class)*
Dynamo Kiev (crap)
Lyon*(class)*
Roma *(again)*
Barcelona*(class)*
now for Chelsea's
Schalke (average)
Rosenborg (crap)
Valencia (crap)
Olympiacos (crap)
Fenerbahce (crap)
LIVERPOOL... for the 16th time this season
secondly the only reason why Chelsea arent rightful champions of Europe in my eyes is cause they didnt win the 2007 EPL title and so shouldnt be in the comp.
They have as much right to play Champions League this season as Lazio do
having said that I hope they demolish Man U, not that Ill be watching
Last edited by FerrariTifosi27 on Tue May 06, 2008 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:25 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Champions league final
doesnt need to be an Italian club there for me to watch, just the promise of a good game. Last final i didnt watch live for whatever reason was probably 2002, which i remember watching on replay anyway.Bianchi9Amaranto wrote:Same here.....the best was in 2003, I'll never forget that moment. Also when Milan made the final last year. If an Italian club or two make the finals then I'd definently watch.
Last year was great, not cause an Italian club won but more cause Liverpool lost. i took a lot of pleasure in seeing the look on Gerrard's face after the game
only thing better than that was seeing Totti's face each and every time we win the derby
- FerrariTifosi27
- Star Player
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:48 pm
Re: Champions league final
goldil duce wrote:doesnt need to be an Italian club there for me to watch, just the promise of a good game. Last final i didnt watch live for whatever reason was probably 2002, which i remember watching on replay anyway.Bianchi9Amaranto wrote:Same here.....the best was in 2003, I'll never forget that moment. Also when Milan made the final last year. If an Italian club or two make the finals then I'd definently watch.
Last year was great, not cause an Italian club won but more cause Liverpool lost. i took a lot of pleasure in seeing the look on Gerrard's face after the game
only thing better than that was seeing Totti's face each and every time we win the derby
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6686
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:25 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Champions league final
if he decides to show upinterpool wrote:If C Ronaldo plays good Man U should take it out
- delfino_1936
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:25 am
Re: Champions league final
totsreds08 wrote:if he decides to show upinterpool wrote:If C Ronaldo plays good Man U should take it out
Re: Champions league final
chelsea will beat man u convincingly as they display at the bridge.With extra support coming from russian supporters will boost chelsea.Man U to win the league by goal difference and chelsea will be champions of Europe through drogba and ballack .
"I was a childhood genius but suffered from ADD i invented dice and bubble wrap when i was 6 years of age and the money was put in a trust fund until i was 30- when I was 30 i got the money i went Las vegas and blew 90% of it in the first week"
Re: Champions league final
theres more ppl on here watntin man utd 2 lose rather then chelsea win
i like it
i like it