The Cerebral Assassin wrote:most boring team to watch,
ADELAIDE UNITED
who gives a fuck about boring. you should support AU 110% regardless of the circumstance. anyone who thinks AU is boring should stop setting the standards for now so fucking high. give them a chance, support them and the club will evolve.
Stevie G Anfield Legend wrote:you sound quite proud of yourself
even if no one else seems to agree with you
and marco ballotta it seems every thing you say is some how related to how great italians are.
not sure if the 1st part of your post is directed at me but not everything I say is related to how great Italians are. I spend plenty of time defending our game though and preaching its greatness. on the other hand many others on here are full of s.hit
yeah you've said that several times now. this topic isn't for justifying boring football, it's just to nominate who you believe plays the most boring football
tobes wrote:yeah you've said that several times now. this topic isn't for justifying boring football, it's just to nominate who you believe plays the most boring football
tobes wrote:yeah you've said that several times now. this topic isn't for justifying boring football, it's just to nominate who you believe plays the most boring football
Oh ok then i nominate Liverpoo!
strongly disagree
If ye cannae dae the bouncy you're a Tim!
If ye cannae dae the bouncy you're a Tim!
If ye cannae dae the bouncy, cannae dae the bouncy,
Cannae dae the bouncy you're a Tim!
Would rather watch Chelsea over Liverpool any day. Both play quite negative but Chelsea have a team full of quality match winners who are likely to produce something out of nothing.
Jimbob wrote:Would rather watch Chelsea over Liverpool any day. Both play quite negative but Chelsea have a team full of quality match winners who are likely to produce something out of nothing.
yea but you a stupid manc, so of course your gna say Liverpool.
Roman Gladiator 04 wrote:Liverpool.. they r crap (2 man team)
ok you knob..we arent a 2 man team..we played arsenal with torres on the bench and gerrard, and we drew 1-1..we played everton without torres and gerrard came off when we were 1-1 and we still won. we played chelsea away with no torres and drew..get your facts right..every team has there stand out players but if they were a 2 man team..they could win it without the other 9 on the field
marco ballotta wrote:hawkesy is my only real contender more biggest cabernet stirrer
For the record: I'd take 3 points for my team rather than see them playing exciting football. How often do you hear the phrase "they're too good to go down!".
My team are in a dog fight at the bottom. 1-0 with 93rd minute penalty winners I'll take all the time.
Boring to me is the continental patient build up style. 27 passes to get over the half way line. The English game is becoming like this, it used to be played end to end, hard tackling and at top speed. Now it's becoming continental.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
For the record: I'd take 3 points for my team rather than see them playing exciting football.
Strongly disagree, beautiful football is the most important in my opinion
Boring to me is the continental patient build up style. 27 passes to get over the half way line.
Strongly agree, this is the kind of football you see in Serie A and OH MY GOD IS IT THE MOST BORING THING EVER!!! As a whole I would say Serie A is the most boring, I can't pick out a specific team because they're all equally as boring although if we're going to rap on english teams.....Chelsea is well boring.