Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
Rigoni 10 wrote:LOL @ everyone on this forum hating spuds...what champions!!!King Ledley wrote:LOL @ diegom hating arsenal...what a champion
ARE YOU WATCHING, ARE YOU WATCHING, ARE YOU WATCHING TOTTENHAM??
ARE YOU WATCHING TOTTENHAM??
if thatdiegom wrote:skliro wrote:Inter (1st) vs Liverpool (5th) 0-2diegom wrote:
I bet if a mid table team in EPL played Inter, Inter would easily beat them!
AC Milan (5th) vs Arsenal (1st) 0-2
Last time Im check, mid table team meant 10/11 position
Oh thats right, EPL only real has 8 decent teams in it!
tobes wrote:i couldn't give a flying fuck what man u or arsenal did or dodiegom wrote:U r a tosser, tobes!
U support liverpoooooo, man u and assssnal!
the phrase 'too [something] to do [something]' infers that they are unable to do something. your statement after the hyphen is supposed to contradict the statement before that. but in the end, it just doesn't make any sensediegom wrote:Laughing at baptista, he predicted that asssnal were TOO GOOD to win the EPL title - Asssnal blew an 8pt lead to 1 pt lead.
I bet if a mid table team in EPL played Inter, Inter would easily beat them!
a mid table team in EPL did play Inter and did beat Inter the other week
[/quote]
once again, no sense made! you just try divert attention away from you getting hammered all the timediegom wrote:tobes wrote: i couldn't give a flying fuck what man u or arsenal did or do
the phrase 'too [something] to do [something]' infers that they are unable to do something. your statement after the hyphen is supposed to contradict the statement before that. but in the end, it just doesn't make any sensediegom wrote:Laughing at baptista, he predicted that asssnal were TOO GOOD to win the EPL title - Asssnal blew an 8pt lead to 1 pt lead.
I bet if a mid table team in EPL played Inter, Inter would easily beat them!
a mid table team in EPL did play Inter and did beat Inter the other week
Yes Ronaldo07, calling the kettle black!
so how is it that we went from comparing top 5 teams (who've actually recently played against each other) to top 10 teams?diegom wrote:diegom wrote:Last time Im check, mid table team meant 10/11 position
Oh thats right, EPL only real has 8 decent teams in it!Rigoni10 wrote:if that
Sorry, 4-5 teams worth a mention!
the phrase 'too [something] to do [something]' infers that they are unable to do something. your statement after the hyphen is supposed to contradict the statement before that. but in the end, it just doesn't make any sensediegom wrote:Laughing at baptista, he predicted that asssnal were TOO GOOD to win the EPL title - Asssnal blew an 8pt lead to 1 pt lead.
I bet if a mid table team in EPL played Inter, Inter would easily beat them!
[/quote]once again, no sense made! you just try divert attention away from you getting hammered all the time [/quote] tobes wrote:so how is it that we went from comparing top 5 teams (who've actually recently played against each other) to top 10 teams?diegom wrote:diegom wrote:Last time Im check, mid table team meant 10/11 position
Oh thats right, EPL only real has 8 decent teams in it!Rigoni10 wrote:if that
Sorry, 4-5 teams worth a mention!
i don't understand some people on here.. they'll support a team from a league, but do nothing but say how the standard of the league is crap compared to other leagues. it's pretty strange.
diegom wrote: Yeah obviously gettin hammered!
WE ALL KNOW THAT U AND RONALDO ARE THE SAME FU.shiraz PERSON, SO CUT IT OUT!
U R FOOLIN NOBODY!
so milan are 5th, but at best they're 10th, however for liverpool who are 5th, they are 5th? you're still not making any sense boy!diegom wrote:because, if u actually read my post instead of prematurely ejaculating, I said Milan at best are a mid table team this year!
Hence when it was posted that liverpool beat Inter at home 2-0, I commented that MID TABLE meant position 10/11 in EPL not 5th.
Then I said, thats correct cos in EPL only real 5 teams are worth mentioning, the rest are useless!
if you're responding to me, that's not my point at all.Rigoni 10 wrote:it's the truth and has been like that for years.
Arsenal and Man USA were only teams that contested for the title year in year out.
Now chelski have come along so it's 3 teams. Liverpoo are strong but haven't been good enough to win the league. There's the top 4 teams and they have been for the past 5-10 years except in 04/05.
Only other teams worth a mention for me are Everton and Man Citeh. Now Villa are really starting to have a go.
tobes wrote:if you're responding to me, that's not my point at all.Rigoni 10 wrote:it's the truth and has been like that for years.
Arsenal and Man USA were only teams that contested for the title year in year out.
Now chelski have come along so it's 3 teams. Liverpoo are strong but haven't been good enough to win the league. There's the top 4 teams and they have been for the past 5-10 years except in 04/05.
Only other teams worth a mention for me are Everton and Man Citeh. Now Villa are really starting to have a go.
i don't understand why people support teams in different leagues, but when people compare the leagues, they slag off one of the leagues that they have a team they support (clearly the league to which they have no heritage from). it seems pointless to me, but then again, i only support the one team so i guess i don't have first had knowledge of what it's like to support multiple teams in different leagues *shrug*
tobes wrote:if you're responding to me, that's not my point at all.Rigoni 10 wrote:it's the truth and has been like that for years.
Arsenal and Man USA were only teams that contested for the title year in year out.
Now chelski have come along so it's 3 teams. Liverpoo are strong but haven't been good enough to win the league. There's the top 4 teams and they have been for the past 5-10 years except in 04/05.
Only other teams worth a mention for me are Everton and Man Citeh. Now Villa are really starting to have a go.
i don't understand why people support teams in different leagues, but when people compare the leagues, they slag off one of the leagues that they have a team they support (clearly the league to which they have no heritage from). it seems pointless to me, but then again, i only support the one team so i guess i don't have first had knowledge of what it's like to support multiple teams in different leagues *shrug*
couldn't have said it better.diegom wrote:tobes wrote:if you're responding to me, that's not my point at all.Rigoni 10 wrote:it's the truth and has been like that for years.
Arsenal and Man USA were only teams that contested for the title year in year out.
Now chelski have come along so it's 3 teams. Liverpoo are strong but haven't been good enough to win the league. There's the top 4 teams and they have been for the past 5-10 years except in 04/05.
Only other teams worth a mention for me are Everton and Man Citeh. Now Villa are really starting to have a go.
i don't understand why people support teams in different leagues, but when people compare the leagues, they slag off one of the leagues that they have a team they support (clearly the league to which they have no heritage from). it seems pointless to me, but then again, i only support the one team so i guess i don't have first had knowledge of what it's like to support multiple teams in different leagues *shrug*
We ALL KNOW that the Serie A is the BEST league in the WORLD.
I only "slag" of the EPl when retards ala Ronaldo (tobes) have a go at Serie A and state that EPL teams are far betta than Serie A.
I love watching the EPl, I support Man U but technically, the Serie A is much beta - skill level wise
CAPISCE, ur whats "do u understand" in Malaysian?????
will musafcboy come cause he said he doesn't like to watch big games out??diegom wrote:cheers riggsy, makes the all important Man U V Asssssnal match more interesting
so far we have
Massechusetts USA
diegom
manu4life
mufcboy
Arsenal FC
rigoni10
pires7
is that a list of you 'lads' goin somewhere to watch that game or just who on here goes for which of them?Rigoni 10 wrote:diegom wrote:cheers riggsy, makes the all important Man U V Asssssnal match more interesting
so far we have
Massechusetts USA
diegom
manu4life
mufcboy
Arsenal FC
rigoni10
pires7
diegom wrote:tobes wrote:if you're responding to me, that's not my point at all.Rigoni 10 wrote:it's the truth and has been like that for years.
Arsenal and Man USA were only teams that contested for the title year in year out.
Now chelski have come along so it's 3 teams. Liverpoo are strong but haven't been good enough to win the league. There's the top 4 teams and they have been for the past 5-10 years except in 04/05.
Only other teams worth a mention for me are Everton and Man Citeh. Now Villa are really starting to have a go.
i don't understand why people support teams in different leagues, but when people compare the leagues, they slag off one of the leagues that they have a team they support (clearly the league to which they have no heritage from). it seems pointless to me, but then again, i only support the one team so i guess i don't have first had knowledge of what it's like to support multiple teams in different leagues *shrug*
We ALL KNOW that the Serie A is the BEST league in the WORLD.
I only "slag" of the EPl when retards ala Ronaldo (tobes) have a go at Serie A and state that EPL teams are far betta than Serie A.
I love watching the EPl, I support Man U but technically, the Serie A is much beta - skill level wise
CAPISCE, ur whats "do u understand" in Malaysian?????
i've never said the EPL was better than any league, i've said it's more entertaining. i think la liga is the best league technically. we are going to watch that big game at the Rosemont.Mr DJ wrote:is that a list of you 'lads' goin somewhere to watch that game or just who on here goes for which of them?Rigoni 10 wrote:diegom wrote:cheers riggsy, makes the all important Man U V Asssssnal match more interesting
so far we have
Massechusetts USA
diegom
manu4life
mufcboy
Arsenal FC
rigoni10
pires7
You speak for everyone do you? A worldwide audience will disagree with you. Go to any neutral country or continent and you will see people walking around in EPL tops. How many non italians do you see wearing Serie A tops around the streets compared to EPL. Very little if any.diegom wrote:[
We ALL KNOW that the Serie A is the BEST league in the WORLD.
I only "slag" of the EPl when retards ala Ronaldo (tobes) have a go at Serie A and state that EPL teams are far betta than Serie A.
I love watching the EPl, I support Man U but technically, the Serie A is much beta - skill level wise
CAPISCE, ur whats "do u understand" in Malaysian?????
sparrow wrote:for the record, I would rather watch Wigan v Derby than the Milan derby
why would major TV companies bid big $oldi for a shit quality footage. So EPL is popular in Asia and in Australia. majority of people in those countries dont know shit about the game so judging the quality of a league on their opinions is stupid.sparrow wrote:You speak for everyone do you? A worldwide audience will disagree with you. Go to any neutral country or continent and you will see people walking around in EPL tops. How many non italians do you see wearing Serie A tops around the streets compared to EPL. Very little if any.diegom wrote:[
We ALL KNOW that the Serie A is the BEST league in the WORLD.
I only "slag" of the EPl when retards ala Ronaldo (tobes) have a go at Serie A and state that EPL teams are far betta than Serie A.
I love watching the EPl, I support Man U but technically, the Serie A is much beta - skill level wise
CAPISCE, ur whats "do u understand" in Malaysian?????
Yeah Serie A games are not easily viewable as EPL games and the reason is because there is no demand for it, especially in A country like Australia. You don't see tv companies fighting for the rights to show Serie A, probably because no non Italians would watch it.
Get over yourself. People have different opinions, and for the record, I would rather watch Wigan v Derby than the Milan derby. My personal preference that so don't take it personally will you.
Great work Gunners, even though I dispise you guys
