Kevin Rudd to put Socceroos back on Free-to-Air
Moderators: Randoman, BillShankly, arxidi, Forum Admins
Kevin Rudd to put Socceroos back on Free-to-Air
Fellas, this probably doesn't belong here on this forum, but it may be of some interest to some of you and hopefully influence your vote.
This is from Eammon's "Football in the Capital Blog":
Kevin Rudd to put Socceroos back on Free-To-Air
Senator Kate Lundy announced Labour football policy on the SBS today.
And it nearly bowled me over!
$32 million over 4 years, that is double the Liberal party commitment, with most of the expenditure in the next two years.
This would cover a TELEVISED women's national league,
A Labour Government will put the World Cup qualifiers back on Free-To-Air. That will really benefit the game and give the children, the players, and our future, the chance to see the stars of the World Game they play.
And they will have a use it or lose policy for sports broadcasters.
and money for grassroots, and Australian teams into Asia.
It sounded good to me. It sounded like, finally, after all these years, an Australian Political Party can see the benefit of the game to Australia politically, economically, socially and culturally.
The Labour Party seemed to have tapped into the growth of the game at grassroots level, the Socceroos and Matildas success, and the opportunities the sports can bring to Australia through increasing our links across Asia and the World.
Not hard really. Makes you wonder why The Liberal party haven't taken the initiative over the years as they have continued to pour disproportionate amounts into Rugby Union and Rugby League.
Disproportionate to the numbers who play, and the countries the National teams meet.
Which ever party you vote for, football fans can at least be pleased about the benefits the game will gain from a Rudd Labour Government.
This is from Eammon's "Football in the Capital Blog":
Kevin Rudd to put Socceroos back on Free-To-Air
Senator Kate Lundy announced Labour football policy on the SBS today.
And it nearly bowled me over!
$32 million over 4 years, that is double the Liberal party commitment, with most of the expenditure in the next two years.
This would cover a TELEVISED women's national league,
A Labour Government will put the World Cup qualifiers back on Free-To-Air. That will really benefit the game and give the children, the players, and our future, the chance to see the stars of the World Game they play.
And they will have a use it or lose policy for sports broadcasters.
and money for grassroots, and Australian teams into Asia.
It sounded good to me. It sounded like, finally, after all these years, an Australian Political Party can see the benefit of the game to Australia politically, economically, socially and culturally.
The Labour Party seemed to have tapped into the growth of the game at grassroots level, the Socceroos and Matildas success, and the opportunities the sports can bring to Australia through increasing our links across Asia and the World.
Not hard really. Makes you wonder why The Liberal party haven't taken the initiative over the years as they have continued to pour disproportionate amounts into Rugby Union and Rugby League.
Disproportionate to the numbers who play, and the countries the National teams meet.
Which ever party you vote for, football fans can at least be pleased about the benefits the game will gain from a Rudd Labour Government.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Re: Kevin Rudd to put Socceroos back on Free-to-Air
If it's related to the national side then it belongs here.rivaldo wrote:Fellas, this probably doesn't belong here on this forum
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 2853
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:31 pm
it was a gung ho election promise.
firstly he has to come up with a way of changing the broadcasting services act proving socceroo matches are "inaacessable" to the majority of the population.
secondly, he has to convince the FFA powerbrokers to settle for less money.
thirdly, he has the FOXTEL/PBL/Telstra backlash to deal with.
if it happens, dont expect anything until after the 2010 world cup.
firstly he has to come up with a way of changing the broadcasting services act proving socceroo matches are "inaacessable" to the majority of the population.
secondly, he has to convince the FFA powerbrokers to settle for less money.
thirdly, he has the FOXTEL/PBL/Telstra backlash to deal with.
if it happens, dont expect anything until after the 2010 world cup.

quite possibly true but I hope your wrong with the time frameThe Kop wrote:it was a gung ho election promise.
firstly he has to come up with a way of changing the broadcasting services act proving socceroo matches are "inaacessable" to the majority of the population.
secondly, he has to convince the FFA powerbrokers to settle for less money.
thirdly, he has the FOXTEL/PBL/Telstra backlash to deal with.
if it happens, dont expect anything until after the 2010 world cup.
the only thing the government need to do is work with fox and any FTA station willing and have the national games live.
if fox can do it with aussie rules then there is an easy fix and no one has to loose not even fox as the money they get will be for national games only.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 2853
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:31 pm
ratings what ratings notice that all of the programs on tonight against the match are repeats! the stations are as weak as.E. Grant & Co wrote:If it goes on a FTA station expect them to bury it at some ungodly hour.
Do you really expect a commercial station to put their 'expensive' first week of ratings programs on hold for a Socceroo match......I don't think so Tim!!!
if they can get the ratings from the fan base then they will want it, they just don't want too pay!
- FerrariTifosi27
- Star Player
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:48 pm
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22074
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Money
Money doesn't talk it swears.the_gun wrote:im sure sbs wanted to keep the rights.
The game needed cash to start A -League Fox came up with the cash it needed, should have only signed a four year deal not seven.