Final Series in the Amateur League
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
Final Series in the Amateur League
What do you think about having finals in the amateur league? A lot of my mates play the egg ball game and they are now preparing for finals, I personally think it would be great, nothing like finals footy. I know that all the other leagues in the world have the 1st passed the post system but in Australia with the AFL & Rugby we have all been brought up with finals. We could still reward the team that finishes top. A lot of teams at this stage of the year either have no chance of promotion and no chance of relegation, but if there was a top 4 or 5 spot up for grab it would definitely make it more exciting for those teams.
Just a thought, what do you think
Just a thought, what do you think
- robinfriday10
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm
- haywood djablowme
- Star Player
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
i think its a great idea A League do it so why dont we??.. not just for the players themselves but for the club also.
Some clubs struggle to survive financially and with only 9 league games @ home during the year this is only a small window of opportunity for clubs to make some $$.. now with introducing a final system or extending the league this will give clubs more opportunity to financially rep the rewards and also give clubs the opp to attract more sponsorship etc
Look @ the crowd Gardens v Downs imagine the crowds you would pull for a finals system - Make Fed players/clubs even more jealous
But from a players point of view i would love it.. 18 games is just not enough.. & it will give us even more of a chance to knock those boys from the Downs off
Some clubs struggle to survive financially and with only 9 league games @ home during the year this is only a small window of opportunity for clubs to make some $$.. now with introducing a final system or extending the league this will give clubs more opportunity to financially rep the rewards and also give clubs the opp to attract more sponsorship etc
Look @ the crowd Gardens v Downs imagine the crowds you would pull for a finals system - Make Fed players/clubs even more jealous
But from a players point of view i would love it.. 18 games is just not enough.. & it will give us even more of a chance to knock those boys from the Downs off
-
- Coach
- Posts: 24371
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm
Well said. First past the post rewards the most consistant side. Cup rewards and unbeaten side and that's enough.Furburger wrote:Finals series does not necessarily reward the best team throughout the season. I reckon the finals series is a joke. It rewards mediocrity, which is exaclty what AFL and NRL are when compared to codes around the world.
A finals set up just allowssome knobs who finish second or below to celebrate something they didn't win and in my eyes will never be anything more than a post season mini tournament
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:22 pm
this is football not GAYFL i mean AFL. well said, leave it alone.nugget66 wrote:i think leave it alone....it's not broken so dont try & fix it ! it should be most consistant team over the year wins the league!
besides we do have cup finals ! A-League final series sucks big time they have it all wrong there!
"I firmly believe that any mans finest hour - his greatest fulfillment to all he holds dear...... Is that moment when he has played his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the filed of battle....Victorious"
- Fresh Football
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:20 pm
First past the post is defnitely the way to go!
There is the divisional play offs which reward finishing first and you get to test yourself against other divisions much like the cup, but from what I understand clubs don't get anything for winning it.
League and cup should be it!
There is the divisional play offs which reward finishing first and you get to test yourself against other divisions much like the cup, but from what I understand clubs don't get anything for winning it.
League and cup should be it!
Adelaide Wanderers
2005 COLLEGIATE CUP CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 A
2006 DIVISIONAL CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 B
2008 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 1 A
2008 CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS
2013 CHALLENGE CUP QUARTER FINALISTS
http://www.adelaidewanderers.com
2005 COLLEGIATE CUP CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 A
2006 DIVISIONAL CHAMPIONS
2006 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 2 B
2008 CHAMPIONS Sat Div 1 A
2008 CHAMPIONS OF CHAMPIONS
2013 CHALLENGE CUP QUARTER FINALISTS
http://www.adelaidewanderers.com
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:54 pm
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:22 pm
and what the bottom team goes down and the three above them play off for relegation???? all you achieve by doing that is end up with a team in a league when they dont deserve to be there. top 2 go up, bottom 2 go down. going on the last few seasons third place will see you go up aswellKnight7 wrote:First wins 2nd-5th play for promotion unless of course it's Division 1 but the lower divisions need more to play for as many don't take cup seriously due to lack of squad numbers
"I firmly believe that any mans finest hour - his greatest fulfillment to all he holds dear...... Is that moment when he has played his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the filed of battle....Victorious"
It was fun beating Cumberland 2-0 in the grand final though wasn't it. I've got a copy of the game. At the end I run up to you and celebrated by jumping up onto you and you holding me there for a little too long. I jumped so high I pretty much had my balls in your face and I think you might have liked it. We also had some fun celebrating afterwards but I have always regretted going to Scott Mansell's before we went out.onthepissagain wrote:have been involved in finals series during my fed day. stupid idea. doesn't always reward the most consistent team. our finals should always be in cup form
not a fan of the finals series, un til i gave it more thought, could have top 4 play off, bottom 2 in league get relagated as normal, could have 1st play 2nd, winner straight to final, 3rd play 4th, loser eliminated, winner plays loser of other game, winner into the final,
could give clubs something to play for at this time of year when your stuck mid table doing f/a, would definitely be exciting with big crowds,
just a thought but would never happen!
could give clubs something to play for at this time of year when your stuck mid table doing f/a, would definitely be exciting with big crowds,
just a thought but would never happen!
Yeah not a fan of the finals. can understand why clubs want more games at home and all, for profit, but it is an amatuer league. With 18 league games plus cup games and trial games you can play up to 25-30 games. also with the pre season it makes it probably 35 weeks in total. imagine adding on 3 finals games. Too much for the sunday hacker. First past the post has always been fair so no need to change.
WHY DO THEY CALL IT OVALTINE? I MEAN ITS ROUND, WHY DONT THEY CALL IT ROUNDTINE.