Funds Made For Torres :D
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
look accountant geek look beyond numbers, we won the title,carrick played a crucial important roll in this so im sure man utd and sir alex are extremely happy so go preach your soppy bollocks elsewhereLFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
- Judge Judy
- Technical Director
- Posts: 35566
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 7:55 pm
Club honours
Gerrard: 9
Carrick: 1
Personal honours
Gerrard: 4
Carrick: nil
Gerrard: 9
Carrick: 1
Personal honours
Gerrard: 4
Carrick: nil
Ingle Farm Amateur Soccer Club
Website: http://ifasc.com.au
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ifasc
Facebook: http://facebook.com/ifasc
Website: http://ifasc.com.au
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ifasc
Facebook: http://facebook.com/ifasc
- delfino_1936
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 12847
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:25 am
manU4life wrote:look accountant geek look beyond numbers, we won the title,carrick played a crucial important roll in this so im sure man utd and sir alex are extremely happy so go preach your soppy bollocks elsewhereLFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
no Ronaldo played a crucial, Van Der Sar played a crucial role and Scholes played a crucial role... Carrick was basically a bystander. Darren Fletcher, even Kieron Richardson have more EPL's than Gerrard now, oh but wait none of them have a European title
Champions Leagues
Carrick 0
Gerrard 1
C.Ronaldo 0
D.Traore 1
Just because Carrick does dazzel 5 players meg a few then make an assist or score a goal does not mean he is crap. Carrick NEVER gives away the ball for no reason thats what makes him a great player.LFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
Have you wathced him play for England?!?!? Did you watch him against Arsenal in the EPL (the one game i can remember off the top of my head)? For someone who NEVER gives the ball away, he sure did that quite a bit in just those instances... and passing backwardas and sidewards 98% of the time it shoudl be easy to NEVER give the ball away, but he still manages... if ManUSA didnt win the title in 07, mancs would be up in arms about his signing, but you did win it and will attribute the win to his CRUCIAL role in it. IMO his crucial role was that he didnt get the ball often enough, which was good for ManUSA.Baptista wrote:Just because Carrick does dazzel 5 players meg a few then make an assist or score a goal does not mean he is crap. Carrick NEVER gives away the ball for no reason thats what makes him a great player.LFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
1st - u wont expect someone to play DAMN WELL for his international debut dont you ?
2nd - Just bcause he play sh1t in one game, doesnt mean he's crap ... he's average when we 1st signed him, but then he getting better and better and looks like gel with the team well ... I'm glad we signed him seriously !!
2nd - Just bcause he play sh1t in one game, doesnt mean he's crap ... he's average when we 1st signed him, but then he getting better and better and looks like gel with the team well ... I'm glad we signed him seriously !!
- The one and only
- Star Player
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:19 pm
who really cares about what we all think about carrick this topic is meant to be about torres
im a man u supporter we are gonna say he has done well because he helped us win the league other ppl that support other teams may have a different opinion of him
IMO id rather have carrick for 18 mp and win a title then have spent money on kuyt, crouch, bellamy, gonzalez and finished third thats just me
im a man u supporter we are gonna say he has done well because he helped us win the league other ppl that support other teams may have a different opinion of him
IMO id rather have carrick for 18 mp and win a title then have spent money on kuyt, crouch, bellamy, gonzalez and finished third thats just me
I speak nothing but the truth
im glad someone has put this issue to bedThe one and only wrote:who really cares about what we all think about carrick this topic is meant to be about torres
im a man u supporter we are gonna say he has done well because he helped us win the league other ppl that support other teams may have a different opinion of him
IMO id rather have carrick for 18 mp and win a title then have spent money on kuyt, crouch, bellamy, gonzalez and finished third thats just me
manU4life wrote:im glad someone has put this issue to bedThe one and only wrote:who really cares about what we all think about carrick this topic is meant to be about torres
im a man u supporter we are gonna say he has done well because he helped us win the league other ppl that support other teams may have a different opinion of him
IMO id rather have carrick for 18 mp and win a title then have spent money on kuyt, crouch, bellamy, gonzalez and finished third thats just me
mate you couldnt put it to bed, even if you tried you hardest, god knows you did
ManUSA would of won the EPL if they bought Senna for 4m pounds in place of the 18m pound man, thats all im trying to say.
i didnt try to put nothing to bed mate, you should ask the right questions and you'll get the right answers...maybe some one else had alterior motives to feed you utter crapLFTWNG11 wrote:manU4life wrote:im glad someone has put this issue to bedThe one and only wrote:who really cares about what we all think about carrick this topic is meant to be about torres
im a man u supporter we are gonna say he has done well because he helped us win the league other ppl that support other teams may have a different opinion of him
IMO id rather have carrick for 18 mp and win a title then have spent money on kuyt, crouch, bellamy, gonzalez and finished third thats just me
mate you couldnt put it to bed, even if you tried you hardest, god knows you did
ManUSA would of won the EPL if they bought Senna for 4m pounds in place of the 18m pound man, thats all im trying to say.
- Lilly Whites
- Club Captain
- Posts: 5501
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:13 pm
lol this is a fkn joke
carrick is a fair good player
18 mill was too much but thats wat united decided to pay
the one and only was right about paying that amount rather than spending money on kuyt etc...
man utd seem to make very good midfield signings (carrick, ronaldo, nani, anderson) over the past few years...
none of them have been duds
but if you go over to liverpool and check out some of the prime meat of gonzaleaz, pennant (even more overrated than carrick) and Garcia
i'd say man utd are a bit smarter than you blokes ey?
and dont go ohh look at us we have won a c.l...good for you, man utd won the premiership this year, you lost the c.l and finished 3rd *clap clap*
and if anyone says garcia is a good player
ill rip your heart out
carrick is a fair good player
18 mill was too much but thats wat united decided to pay
the one and only was right about paying that amount rather than spending money on kuyt etc...
man utd seem to make very good midfield signings (carrick, ronaldo, nani, anderson) over the past few years...
none of them have been duds
but if you go over to liverpool and check out some of the prime meat of gonzaleaz, pennant (even more overrated than carrick) and Garcia
i'd say man utd are a bit smarter than you blokes ey?
and dont go ohh look at us we have won a c.l...good for you, man utd won the premiership this year, you lost the c.l and finished 3rd *clap clap*
and if anyone says garcia is a good player
ill rip your heart out
and what basis do you state that Nani and Anderson are good signings and that they arent duds? how many games ahve they played in a United shirt?!?! not saying they arent good players or that they wont go on and do well, just asking what are you basing your opinion on when they havent even kicked a ball for united yet?
yea Liverpool just lost the final, what a disgrace, so mcuh worse THAN LOSING 7-1 AND HAVING YOUR COACH BOW DOWN TO THE OPPOSITION COS HE IS A DUMB CUNT.
yea Liverpool just lost the final, what a disgrace, so mcuh worse THAN LOSING 7-1 AND HAVING YOUR COACH BOW DOWN TO THE OPPOSITION COS HE IS A DUMB CUNT.
even you'll admit theres a very high possibility that nani and anderson will turn out to be guns and id go as far as saying that you'd like to see them at the pool instead on gonzalez and pennantLFTWNG11 wrote:and what basis do you state that Nani and Anderson are good signings and that they arent duds? how many games ahve they played in a United shirt?!?! not saying they arent good players or that they wont go on and do well, just asking what are you basing your opinion on when they havent even kicked a ball for united yet?
yea Liverpool just lost the final, what a disgrace, so mcuh worse THAN LOSING 7-1 AND HAVING YOUR COACH BOW DOWN TO THE OPPOSITION COS HE IS A DUMB CUNT.
Champions League:LFTWNG11 wrote:manU4life wrote:look accountant geek look beyond numbers, we won the title,carrick played a crucial important roll in this so im sure man utd and sir alex are extremely happy so go preach your soppy bollocks elsewhereLFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
no Ronaldo played a crucial, Van Der Sar played a crucial role and Scholes played a crucial role... Carrick was basically a bystander. Darren Fletcher, even Kieron Richardson have more EPL's than Gerrard now, oh but wait none of them have a European title
Champions Leagues
Carrick 0
Gerrard 1
C.Ronaldo 0
D.Traore 1
Giggs - 1
Gerrard - 1
Premier League:
Giggs - 9
Gerrard - 0
What trophys did liverpool win this season???
and cause u always bring up carricks price, id be interested to know how much u would value him at?????
id rather pay 18mil pounds 4 a player like carrick and win the title, then pay over the odds for players like diouf, crouch or heskey and win nuffin!!
but answer my question on how much u woulda paid for carrick and y?
dont count your chickens before they hatch - they said the same about owen at real madrid. look what happened.manU4life wrote:even you'll admit theres a very high possibility that nani and anderson will turn out to be guns and id go as far as saying that you'd like to see them at the pool instead on gonzalez and pennantLFTWNG11 wrote:and what basis do you state that Nani and Anderson are good signings and that they arent duds? how many games ahve they played in a United shirt?!?! not saying they arent good players or that they wont go on and do well, just asking what are you basing your opinion on when they havent even kicked a ball for united yet?
yea Liverpool just lost the final, what a disgrace, so mcuh worse THAN LOSING 7-1 AND HAVING YOUR COACH BOW DOWN TO THE OPPOSITION COS HE IS A DUMB CUNT.
AAAAAANNNYHOW, you guys keep battling it out, it makes good reading for a fridays work.
everyone is entitled to my opinion
tsss
tsss
its a tough question because whilst he's not worth 18 mil he had a super season at spurs before he left which is partly the reason why we paid over the top for him. id say he'd probably be worth 10-12 milMUFCBOY wrote:Champions League:LFTWNG11 wrote:manU4life wrote:look accountant geek look beyond numbers, we won the title,carrick played a crucial important roll in this so im sure man utd and sir alex are extremely happy so go preach your soppy bollocks elsewhereLFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
no Ronaldo played a crucial, Van Der Sar played a crucial role and Scholes played a crucial role... Carrick was basically a bystander. Darren Fletcher, even Kieron Richardson have more EPL's than Gerrard now, oh but wait none of them have a European title
Champions Leagues
Carrick 0
Gerrard 1
C.Ronaldo 0
D.Traore 1
Giggs - 1
Gerrard - 1
Premier League:
Giggs - 9
Gerrard - 0
What trophys did liverpool win this season???
and cause u always bring up carricks price, id be interested to know how much u would value him at?????
id rather pay 18mil pounds 4 a player like carrick and win the title, then pay over the odds for players like diouf, crouch or heskey and win nuffin!!
but answer my question on how much u woulda paid for carrick and y?
ahhh so basically repeat what one and only said... well inMUFCBOY wrote:Champions League:LFTWNG11 wrote:manU4life wrote:look accountant geek look beyond numbers, we won the title,carrick played a crucial important roll in this so im sure man utd and sir alex are extremely happy so go preach your soppy bollocks elsewhereLFTWNG11 wrote:look manUSA4life, jsut cos ur blinded by his 18.6m pound price tag, most sane unbiased would agree Carrick is shit, plain and simple, the fact that MUSABOY basically agrees that Nicky Butt is better proves that. So go back to the rock you crawled out from under.manU4life wrote:theres always someone that takes it to farLFTWNG11 wrote:Nicky Butt was better than Carrick IMO.
no Ronaldo played a crucial, Van Der Sar played a crucial role and Scholes played a crucial role... Carrick was basically a bystander. Darren Fletcher, even Kieron Richardson have more EPL's than Gerrard now, oh but wait none of them have a European title
Champions Leagues
Carrick 0
Gerrard 1
C.Ronaldo 0
D.Traore 1
Giggs - 1
Gerrard - 1
Premier League:
Giggs - 9
Gerrard - 0
What trophys did liverpool win this season???
and cause u always bring up carricks price, id be interested to know how much u would value him at?????
id rather pay 18mil pounds 4 a player like carrick and win the title, then pay over the odds for players like diouf, crouch or heskey and win nuffin!!
but answer my question on how much u woulda paid for carrick and y?
Liverpool didnt win anything this season, im sure you already know that.
we know Giggs has more EPL medals than anyone and he deserves it... Gerrard wont catch him but all things being equal Gerrard will get at least one, weather its at Pool or not is another story. Still... Traore has more CL medals than Ronaldo does that make him a better player?
how much would i have paid for Carrick? as much as you would of paid for Senna, what was that 4m?!?! Carrick is English and had one good season at Spurs thus why so over-priced... and thats not ManUSA's fault... all im saying is that all you mancs who say Carrick was good buy, it won us the title are dellusional, the players you already had plus the younger maturing alot won the EPL, not wasting 18.6m pounds on a fairly average midfielder. So dont get all defensive and uptight, not once I have said ManUSA didnt deserve the title just Carrick is shit and overpriced and you wold of won it with any number of midfielders like him.... *waiting for another generic comeback of "ManUSA won the title with him"*
ManUSA4life, if you READ my post carefully yiou will see I already admitted that at least one of those two will prove a big hit, im just askign how Forza Roma can comment on them not being duds or whatever when they havent even started pre-season!
LFTWNG11 wrote:and what basis do you state that Nani and Anderson are good signings and that they arent duds? how many games ahve they played in a United shirt?!?! not saying they arent good players or that they wont go on and do well, just asking what are you basing your opinion on when they havent even kicked a ball for united yet?
yea Liverpool just lost the final, what a disgrace, so mcuh worse THAN LOSING 7-1 AND HAVING YOUR COACH BOW DOWN TO THE OPPOSITION COS HE IS A DUMB CUNT.
Chill out, mate
What u not scored on the weekend, bit of a dry spell in front of goals????
Ser Alex Ferguson is 10X the man that ur liverpooooooo coach will ever BE.
And Man Utd have been 10X the team liverpooooooo have in the last 10years.
MUFCBOY, I have stated my reasons for not rating him many times... its your perogative to just pick and choose what I say. Because these arguments ar always drawn out and I've repeated myself on this a million times, I did again in the post just above, but true to form you will jsut pick and choose what I have to say, take it as if I'm just bashing United and ignore the facts behind what I have to say.MUFCBOY wrote:i jst wanna c his answer cause all he does is say carrick is over price, and since he states that id like 2 know y and wat he values him at...
arxidi, owen was a gun at madrid, always came on and scored
Do you acknowledge the fact I think no one but ManUSA deserved the title last season? Do you acknowledge the fact I recognise C.Ronaldo as the best in the EPL? so how about acknowledging the fact that I think Carrick isn't that good and that you would have won the EPL with a midfiedler doing the same thing but costing a quarter as that is his true value?!?!?
mate im a laziale, any chance to get stuck into Roma I will take, you should know that. as if me not scoring on the weekend would effect my mood... im not a striker.diegom wrote:LFTWNG11 wrote:and what basis do you state that Nani and Anderson are good signings and that they arent duds? how many games ahve they played in a United shirt?!?! not saying they arent good players or that they wont go on and do well, just asking what are you basing your opinion on when they havent even kicked a ball for united yet?
yea Liverpool just lost the final, what a disgrace, so mcuh worse THAN LOSING 7-1 AND HAVING YOUR COACH BOW DOWN TO THE OPPOSITION COS HE IS A DUMB CUNT.
Chill out, mate
What u not scored on the weekend, bit of a dry spell in front of goals????
Ser Alex Ferguson is 10X the man that ur liverpooooooo coach will ever BE.
And Man Utd have been 10X the team liverpooooooo have in the last 10years.