As much as I despise Collingwood, I think the tribunal made the right decision. Sections from Melbourne's camp seem to forget what happens and can happen in such a sport. Sometimes accidents happen. The whingers need to move on, or if too dangerous, quit the sport.
Bomber wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 8:45 am
As much as I despise Collingwood, I think the tribunal made the right decision. Sections from Melbourne's camp seem to forget what happens and can happen in such a sport. Sometimes accidents happen. The whingers need to move on, or if too dangerous, quit the sport.
Couldnt agree more. I definitely do not like Collingwood at all, but it was a complete accident, and the right decision was made.
I dont have a problem with the 2 previous posts if we applied the standards of yesteryear.....but....the head is sacrosanct and he was off the ground.
Most telling is the fact that he braced for contact by turning his back slightly and thus making contact with his shoulder/arm area....it wasn't full front on.
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
MegaBonus wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 10:02 am
I dont have a problem with the 2 previous posts if we applied the standards of yesteryear.....but....the head is sacrosanct and he was off the ground.
Most telling is the fact that he braced for contact by turning his back slightly and thus making contact with his shoulder/arm area....it wasn't full front on.
So hypothetically, if someone takes a "specky" and in the process makes significant contact with an opponent's head, they should get sanctioned?
Sorry, but unless you introduce helmets Gridiron style, head injuries are always going to be a risk when playing the game.
MegaBonus wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 11:09 amits only a matter of time before someone gets rubbed out for using their knee at head height to take a mark....
Surely the time has come to either rename the Brownlow to the midfielders award and take the votes away from the umpires, some absolute shocking votes either given out last night or not given out
Rookie wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 12:50 pm
Surely the time has come to either rename the Brownlow to the midfielders award and take the votes away from the umpires, some absolute shocking votes either given out last night or not given out
I did read a good point today on it saying that the umpires dont use stats to make their calls they go on what they see and feel on the day. Whether its right or wrong i really dont know but i think the entirety of the blame can not be put on the umpires for this.
The system does need an overhaul like a lot of the AFL does.
Rookie wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 12:50 pm
Surely the time has come to either rename the Brownlow to the midfielders award and take the votes away from the umpires, some absolute shocking votes either given out last night or not given out
I did read a good point today on it saying that the umpires dont use stats to make their calls they go on what they see and feel on the day. Whether its right or wrong i really dont know but i think the entirety of the blame can not be put on the umpires for this.
The system does need an overhaul like a lot of the AFL does.
It is a thankless task for umpires to give out votes post match, but at least these days there a 4 of them on ground to come up with the 3-2-1. I remember when I was ref in SAASL very difficult to sit down post match and have about 10 mins to allocate the votes.