This forum is for discussion of other sports.
Moderators: Randoman , Ernie Cooksey , Forum Admins
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Posts: 51452 Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman » Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:29 am
Bomber wrote: God is an Englishman wrote: Bomber wrote: Thinnest of edges (given out anyway) as opposed to claiming a catch that was a half-volley (given out, when it wasn't). Justice served re Warner and Usman, not with Root. There's your difference.
Root caught it. Only way he didn't was if he had deformed fingers or he had previously dug a hole in the ground to put them in.
Both (if for some strange reason you think Root cheated) then both were attempts to deceive the umpires. Aussies were quick to abuse Broad for not walking, why the hypocrisy?
Broad wasn't given out, the others were so justice prevailed.
By the way, why does Leach wear goggles when he bats, but not when he bowls or fields?
Still cheating.
I don't know, I'm not his optician.
Michael
First Team Regular
Posts: 2082 Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Post
by Michael » Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:25 am
What, the might GIAE does not know everything????
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
Michael
First Team Regular
Posts: 2082 Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Post
by Michael » Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:47 am
God is an Englishman wrote: Michael wrote: What, the might GIAE does not know everything????
Correct, I am not an expert on optometry.
Correction, your not an expert on anything!
(As you claim to be)
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60540 Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 141 times
Post
by Bomber » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:16 am
Maybe its a passive form of cheating. When batting, slow the game down to wipe the fog/sweat from his specs every couple balls. :wink:
Ignore this signature
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Posts: 51452 Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:19 am
Michael wrote: God is an Englishman wrote: Michael wrote: What, the might GIAE does not know everything????
Correct, I am not an expert on optometry.
Correction, your not an expert on anything!
(As you claim to be)
That should be "you're".
Also, that would not be a correction as what you have said actually agrees with my comment.
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Posts: 51452 Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:22 am
Bomber wrote: Maybe its a passive form of cheating. When batting, slow the game down to wipe the fog/sweat from his specs every couple balls. :wink:
who decides if it's cheating or not?
According to some, it's cheating to claim a catch that isn't unless an aussie does it.
It's cheating to get caught and not walk, unless an aussie does it.
Michael
First Team Regular
Posts: 2082 Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Post
by Michael » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:54 am
God is an Englishman wrote: Michael wrote: God is an Englishman wrote:
Correct, I am not an expert on optometry.
Correction, your not an expert on anything!
(As you claim to be)
That should be "you're".
Also, that would not be a correction as what you have said actually agrees with my comment.
Incorrect, I was correcting you.
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
Michael
First Team Regular
Posts: 2082 Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Post
by Michael » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:58 pm
God is an Englishman wrote: Michael wrote:
Incorrect, I was correcting you.
But you haven't corrected anything. In fact, your statement agrees with mine.
Incorrect, once again. I have never agreed with you.
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Posts: 51452 Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman » Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:57 pm
Michael wrote: God is an Englishman wrote: Michael wrote:
Incorrect, I was correcting you.
But you haven't corrected anything. In fact, your statement agrees with mine.
Incorrect, once again. I have never agreed with you.
So, you think I am an expert on optometry then?
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60540 Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 141 times
Post
by Bomber » Fri Sep 20, 2019 3:19 pm
I just thought it might be common knowledge amongst the locals. Seems odd. If he wears contact lenses whilst bowling and fielding, why not also for batting? You'd think it would make more sense to wear them batting if anything.
Ignore this signature
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Posts: 51452 Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times
Post
by God is an Englishman » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:44 am
Bomber wrote: I just thought it might be common knowledge amongst the locals. Seems odd. If he wears contact lenses whilst bowling and fielding, why not also for batting? You'd think it would make more sense to wear them batting if anything.
Feels more comfortable in glasses but risk of them falling off when running round in the field?
A comfort/confidence thing?