Ashwin and the Mankad controversy...

[Michael]

https://au.sports.yahoo.com/ravi-ashwin ... 25755.html

[Michael]

Ravi Ashwin’s controversial Mankad dismissal of Jos Buttler in the Indian Premier League should have been ruled not out.

That’s the opinion shared among a number of cricketers, fans and pundits after footage was analysed from start to finish on Tuesday.

Sensing that Kings XI Punjab would not win their clash with Rajasthan Royals if Buttler remained out there, Ashwin – the team’s captain – took his chance.

He knocked the bails off at the non-striker’s end to send the English batsman back to the dressing room on 69 runs, and the ploy worked as Kings XI won by 14 runs.

But when the umpire sent the appeal upstairs to check if Buttler was out of his crease, a particular portion of the rules was ignored.


Ravi Ashwin shaped to bowl before his unexpected Mankad. Pic: BCCI
More
A 2017 update to law 41.16 reads: “If the non-striker is out of his/her ground from the moment the ball comes into play to the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, the bowler is permitted to attempt to run him/her out.”

Note the key words ‘would normally have been expected to release the ball’.

Former Australian cricket stars Shane Warne and Lisa Sthalekar were among those to point out the discrepancy between the rulebook and what happened on the field.

Warne wrote: “(Ashwin) had no intention of delivering the ball – so it should have been called a dead ball.”


Shane Warne
✔
@ShaneWarne
So disappointed in @ashwinravi99 as a Captain & as a person. All captains sign the #IPL wall & agree to play in the spirit of the game. RA had no intention of delivering the ball - so it should have been called a dead ball. Over to u BCCI - this a not a good look for the #IPL

20.5K
5:36 AM - Mar 26, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
5,658 people are talking about this


Sthalekar added: “(It) should have been called dead ball because at the point of release Buttler is in, but Ashwin waits until his momentum of ‘backing up’ takes him out of the crease’.”

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter

Lisa Sthalekar
✔
@sthalekar93
Here’s my 2 cents worth on THE run out. Should have been called dead ball cause at the point of release Buttler is in, but Ashwin waits until his momentum of “backing up” takes him out of the crease. Butler’s technique could be improved to limit this by being side-on = power

492
10:52 AM - Mar 26, 2019
120 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy


The argument boils down to Ashwin’s desperation to dismiss Buttler, having hesitated on his action to enact the Mankad.

The bowler stopped in his tracks, kept his bowling arm down, looked at Buttler and removed the bails.


Scott Styris
✔
@scottbstyris
My opinion on the Buttler/Ashwin controversy is that its NOT Buttlers fault and its NOT Ashwins fault either

Ashwin is entitled to appeal

I thought the TV umpire made the incorrect decision

Shouldve been dead ball..... play on

4,621
4:43 AM - Mar 26, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,059 people are talking about this



Rick Eyre on cricket
✔
@rickeyrecricket
· Mar 26, 2019
Replying to @Cricket_Ali
I could also argue that Buttler was out of his ground when Ashwin "would normally have been expected to release the ball". It's almost as if 41.16 was written for this situation. Never mind third umpires or DRS I want a barrister for this!


Ali Martin
✔
@Cricket_Ali
sorry, just to clarify I’m not saying dead ball because Buttler was in when run up was balked.

I’m saying dead ball because Buttler is in (or at least not definitively out of) his ground when Ashwin "would normally have been expected to release the ball"

2
9:21 AM - Mar 26, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Ali Martin's other Tweets


View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Matt Balmer
@MattBalmer7
This is an appalling mankad by Ravi Ashwin. Jos Buttler is still in his crease when he lands, so Ashwin should be expected to deliver the ball. Pretty poor effort from the captain. Certainly ain’t winning any ‘spirit of cricket’ awards. #VIVOIPL

60
6:36 AM - Mar 26, 2019
See Matt Balmer's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy



Kartik Dayanand
✔
@KartikDayanand
That's a dead ball.#Ashwin

33
7:39 AM - Mar 26, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See Kartik Dayanand's other Tweets



Citizen/नागरिक/Dost Rajdeep
✔
@sardesairajdeep
Just watched the Ashwin replay for the umpteenth time.. he wasn’t even in full delivery stride when he runs Butler out. Instead, he pauses and waits for Butler to leave the crease! NOT OUT even by LAW and Common sense dictates umpire should have called dead ball!

1,169
7:05 AM - Mar 26, 2019 · New Delhi, India
Twitter Ads info and privacy
283 people are talking about this



robert askew
@chel4sea
· Mar 26, 2019
Replying to @AlisonMitchell
This incident Alison, I think you are sitting on the fence!


AlisonMitchell
✔
@AlisonMitchell
My interpretation of the Law results in not out. Slow mo doesn’t look to me like Buttler was out of his ground at instant Ashwin would “normally have been expected to release the ball”. So dead ball. Difficulty is, Law relies on judging timing of s’thing that hasn’t happened

3
6:49 AM - Mar 26, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
See AlisonMitchell's other Tweets


Ashwin defended his actions after the match, saying his play was “very instinctive”.

“I didn’t even load and he left the crease,” he said.

“It’s always been my take on it, because it’s my half of the crease. We ended on the right side of it but those things are game-changers and batsmen need to be wary of it.”

[Bomber]

My two cents. Give him one friendly warning IF he continually tries to "cheat" by running prior to delivery. After that, you're fair game. Pity in this instance Buttler was in his crease at time of intended delivery.

[Hirohito]

If you can score runs from leg byes then I have no problems with getting out in this fashion.

[Just Dave now]

If you can score runs from leg byes then I have no problems with getting out in this fashion.

yes and a bowler can be one centimetre over the bowling crease and he can miss out on a wicket but the precious batsman seem to get away with everything these days

[Bomber]

If you can score runs from leg byes then I have no problems with getting out in this fashion.

yes and a bowler can be one centimetre over the bowling crease and he can miss out on a wicket but the precious batsman seem to get away with everything these days

And they already have bigger bats, shorter boundaries. Not sure why this doesn't get more attention (mode of dismissal) as it is a form of cheating by the runner/batsman, yet the "fed up" bowler gets all the howls and jeers.

[Cooper]

I think its ridiculous the criticism he has been facing over this.

It a legitimate within the rules way to get someone out, why not use it to your advantage with slack runners.

[God is an Englishman]

I think its ridiculous the criticism he has been facing over this.

It a legitimate within the rules way to get someone out, why not use it to your advantage with slack runners.

1. It's customary to give a warning.

2. Buttler didn't leave his crease until after the bowler should have released the ball.

[Cooper]

I think its ridiculous the criticism he has been facing over this.

It a legitimate within the rules way to get someone out, why not use it to your advantage with slack runners.

1. It's customary to give a warning.

2. Buttler didn't leave his crease until after the bowler should have released the ball.

I heard that he did, but customary doesn't mean its required by the laws (unless it is written in the laws I don't know).

As for if he was out or not I have not commented, from the replays it suggests he wasn't but that doesn't change my point that it is a legitimate way to get someone out in cricket.

[God is an Englishman]

I think its ridiculous the criticism he has been facing over this.

It a legitimate within the rules way to get someone out, why not use it to your advantage with slack runners.

1. It's customary to give a warning.

2. Buttler didn't leave his crease until after the bowler should have released the ball.

I heard that he did, but customary doesn't mean its required by the laws (unless it is written in the laws I don't know).

As for if he was out or not I have not commented, from the replays it suggests he wasn't but that doesn't change my point that it is a legitimate way to get someone out in cricket.

It is not written in the laws.

Correct.

[Bomber]

It's not written in the laws in football that a player kicks the ball out when an opponent is down clearly injured. You sometimes cannot legislate for "spirit" of sportsmanship, but I do side with the bowler here provided he did give a soft warning beforehand.

[Raich Carter]

It's not written in the laws in football that a player kicks the ball out when an opponent is down clearly injured. You sometimes cannot legislate for "spirit" of sportsmanship, but I do side with the bowler here provided he did give a soft warning beforehand.

I tend to believe it is the refs decision to stop play when a player is injured. Seen to many players go down like a sack of shite, ball kicked out and they get up and play on.

[Bomber]

It's not written in the laws in football that a player kicks the ball out when an opponent is down clearly injured. You sometimes cannot legislate for "spirit" of sportsmanship, but I do side with the bowler here provided he did give a soft warning beforehand.

I tend to believe it is the refs decision to stop play when a player is injured. Seen to many players go down like a sack of shite, ball kicked out and they get up and play on.

That is the current law, hence the illustration that sometimes you do things "in the spirit of the game".

If treatment is required, then they have to go off (unless a yellow or red card offence) but for me, they should go off for (at least) the same amount of time they held up play.

[Fountains Of Wayne]

It's not written in the laws in football that a player kicks the ball out when an opponent is down clearly injured.

I never kicked the ball out of play. The referee has a whistle, he can stop play if he feels it is warranted.

[Bomber]

It's not written in the laws in football that a player kicks the ball out when an opponent is down clearly injured.

I never kicked the ball out of play. The referee has a whistle, he can stop play if he feels it is warranted.

I never had to. When I played, for some reason it was rare for players to roll around on the ground injured during play.

[Fountains Of Wayne]

Never did in my ealy days either, but I looked after myself so got to play a lot longer.

[Michael]

It's not written in the laws in football that a player kicks the ball out when an opponent is down clearly injured.

I never kicked the ball out of play. The referee has a whistle, he can stop play if he feels it is warranted.

I never had to. When I played, for some reason it was rare for players to roll around on the ground injured during play.

The good old days, when MEN played sport!