What's the point of having matches with no official refs. It's too open to abuse / intimidation..
If there's not enough refs for lower divisions then they should just scrap the lower divisions, makes a mockery of having "fair" matches..
Matches with no official refs
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
- Executive Member
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 9:19 am
Re: Matches with no official refs
You said it right there. The abuse/intimidation is why there is not enough refs.Cadenza wrote:What's the point of having matches with no official refs. It's too open to abuse / intimidation..
If there's not enough refs for lower divisions then they should just scrap the lower divisions, makes a mockery of having "fair" matches..
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 8909
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Matches with no official refs
whats the ruling in the following situation....
its a first team game.....no ref turns up.....both teams agree for a unofficial to ref....game commences (team sheets are filled in (correctly
) and submitted to the unofficial ref.
for whatever reason and regardless of the score, a teams chooses not to continue...
outcome???
its a first team game.....no ref turns up.....both teams agree for a unofficial to ref....game commences (team sheets are filled in (correctly

for whatever reason and regardless of the score, a teams chooses not to continue...
outcome???
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
Re: Matches with no official refs
I would suggest the team that decided not to continue would forfeitMegaBonus wrote:whats the ruling in the following situation....
its a first team game.....no ref turns up.....both teams agree for a unofficial to ref....game commences (team sheets are filled in (correctly) and submitted to the unofficial ref.
for whatever reason and regardless of the score, a teams chooses not to continue...
outcome???
Are you Bodo in disguise?
Re: Matches with no official refs
At the end of the day, most of us play for fun. There are some teams who are known to have a home referee who cheats etc, however I can't remember any of the well known teams winning anythingCadenza wrote:What's the point of having matches with no official refs. It's too open to abuse / intimidation..
If there's not enough refs for lower divisions then they should just scrap the lower divisions, makes a mockery of having "fair" matches..
We can get carried away with the official nature of everything, I'd rather play and lose, than not play due to there being no referee, even if one or two decisions are a bit biased
Are you Bodo in disguise?
Re: Matches with no official refs
I could be wrong (and happy to stand corrected) but I thought that technically a first team must have an official ref to start, no ref no game??? even if someone puts their hand up and both sides agree, no ref no game.Knight15 wrote:I would suggest the team that decided not to continue would forfeitMegaBonus wrote:whats the ruling in the following situation....
its a first team game.....no ref turns up.....both teams agree for a unofficial to ref....game commences (team sheets are filled in (correctly) and submitted to the unofficial ref.
for whatever reason and regardless of the score, a teams chooses not to continue...
outcome???
In my time at Anfield we always said we had the best two teams on Merseyside - Liverpool and Liverpool reserves.
-- Bill Shankly --
-- Bill Shankly --