Cup Round 1
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, Forum Admins
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Cup Round 1
The cup draw happened yesterday, although I haven't found the fixtures on line. I believe that these are the first round match ups in the WNPL/State League cup- first team listed is home: If I've been misinformed or made an error, feel free to make a correction....
Cumberland v. Para Hills
Salisbury United v. Salisbury Inter
Western Strikers v. Uni
Croydon v. West Adelaide
Campbelltown v. Fulham
Jaguars v. City
Metro bye
Comets bye
If the way the draw was done is the way it's always been done in the past, then all the teams get put in a pot and randomly drawn out one by one, first drawn is home and second away in each pair.
I wonder what the statistical probability is that there are no matches between WNPL clubs and none between State League Clubs, and that the two byes fall one in each competition...I'm not sure I've ever seen that happen before. Was anyone at the draw and can comment?
And for anyone who is going to ask, NTC has never played in the Cup.
Cumberland v. Para Hills
Salisbury United v. Salisbury Inter
Western Strikers v. Uni
Croydon v. West Adelaide
Campbelltown v. Fulham
Jaguars v. City
Metro bye
Comets bye
If the way the draw was done is the way it's always been done in the past, then all the teams get put in a pot and randomly drawn out one by one, first drawn is home and second away in each pair.
I wonder what the statistical probability is that there are no matches between WNPL clubs and none between State League Clubs, and that the two byes fall one in each competition...I'm not sure I've ever seen that happen before. Was anyone at the draw and can comment?
And for anyone who is going to ask, NTC has never played in the Cup.
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2018 9:36 pm
Re: Cup Round 1
Is some suspecting that something is wrong in the way the draw is conducted and the probabilities of no WNPL Clubs playing each other? Perish the thought!
See City and Westies have done very well in the draw.
See City and Westies have done very well in the draw.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Having done the draw myself in the past, I am NOT questioning the integrity of the draw- that also questions the personal integrity of those who conduct it, and that’s not on. I was merely wondering whether the procedure was the same as in years past, and remarking that the way it turned out is unusual compared to other draws I’ve seen.
And if you ask me, all of the WNPL clubs did well in the draw.
And if you ask me, all of the WNPL clubs did well in the draw.
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:08 pm
Re: Cup Round 1
We had someone at the draw, and it done just by random with all teams put together in one cup, and teams randomly pulled out. A coincidence for sure!
- haywood djablowme
- Star Player
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 37 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Lol
The girls who left Inter and went to Para now at Salisbury, get to play their old club 2 years in a row in the cup.
The girls who left Inter and went to Para now at Salisbury, get to play their old club 2 years in a row in the cup.
SAASL SUNDAY PREMIER LEAGUE CHAMPION 2010 2011
SAASL CHALLENGE CUP WINNER 2008 2010 2011
SAASL CHAMPION OF CHAMPIONS WINNER 2010
SAASL CICHANOWSKI SHIELD WINNER 2009 2011 2012
SAASL CHALLENGE CUP WINNER 2008 2010 2011
SAASL CHAMPION OF CHAMPIONS WINNER 2010
SAASL CICHANOWSKI SHIELD WINNER 2009 2011 2012
Re: Cup Round 1
juniorsupporter wrote:The cup draw happened yesterday, although I haven't found the fixtures on line. I believe that these are the first round match ups in the WNPL/State League cup- first team listed is home: If I've been misinformed or made an error, feel free to make a correction....
Cumberland v. Para Hills
Salisbury United v. Salisbury Inter
Western Strikers v. Uni
Croydon v. West Adelaide
Campbelltown v. Fulham
Jaguars v. City
Metro bye
Comets bye
If the way the draw was done is the way it's always been done in the past, then all the teams get put in a pot and randomly drawn out one by one, first drawn is home and second away in each pair.
2 teams with a bye, surely they could play each other!
I wonder what the statistical probability is that there are no matches between WNPL clubs and none between State League Clubs, and that the two byes fall one in each competition...I'm not sure I've ever seen that happen before. Was anyone at the draw and can comment?
And for anyone who is going to ask, NTC has never played in the Cup.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
You need 8 teams going into the next round. If metro and comets played each other, you’d only have 7. This is standard fixture structure when you have 14 teams to work with...
Re: Cup Round 1
thanks picked it up after I submitted my post, getting old takes a while for the brain to kick in.juniorsupporter wrote:You need 8 teams going into the next round. If metro and comets played each other, you’d only have 7. This is standard fixture structure when you have 14 teams to work with...
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
What are peoples picks for the cup round?
Mine are:
Cumberland v. Para Hills
Salisbury United v. Salisbury Inter
Western Strikers v. Uni
Croydon v. West Adelaide
Campbelltown v. Fulham
Jaguars v. City
Mine are:
Cumberland v. Para Hills
Salisbury United v. Salisbury Inter
Western Strikers v. Uni
Croydon v. West Adelaide
Campbelltown v. Fulham
Jaguars v. City
The goalkeeper is the jewel in the crown and getting at him should be almost impossible. It's the biggest sin in football to make him do any work.
George Graham
George Graham
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:57 am
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Some good games and an "upset" abounds.
Cumberland to defeat Para Hills
Salisbury Inter to defeat its home town rivals Salisbury United and take home the bragging rights
Uni to defeat the Strikers,. Not easily but a tight game awaits
Westies to defeat Croydon in a demolition job
Campbelltown to easily defeat its soon to be league mates Fulham
City to defeat the Jaguars. This will be a good game though as the Jaguars can put up a good fight.
Cumberland to defeat Para Hills
Salisbury Inter to defeat its home town rivals Salisbury United and take home the bragging rights
Uni to defeat the Strikers,. Not easily but a tight game awaits
Westies to defeat Croydon in a demolition job
Campbelltown to easily defeat its soon to be league mates Fulham
City to defeat the Jaguars. This will be a good game though as the Jaguars can put up a good fight.
Re: Cup Round 1
I agree with your tips BTK except Campbelltown to beat Fulham. Campbelltown have won only 3 times this season and currently sit 5th. They are a very young team and whilst they have a lot of potential will find it very hard to compete with Fulham in my opinion. There is a big difference between the WNPL and the State League teams (excluding Comets and Salisbury United). Fulham are slowly improving (demonstrated during recent losses 1 nil to Inter and 2 nil to NTC) and I believe will win easy against Campbelltown 5-0. No certainty just yet, to get relegated either. Long way to go….
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:57 am
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Ok I concede....maybe I was looking for the result most likely to cause an upset.
Whilst Campbelltown aren't sitting up at the top of their Division, Fulham are planted at the bottom. Therefore, my prediction was based on many factors
I will concede that it is highly likely Fulham will win, it may be a win by the slightest margin.
Whilst Campbelltown aren't sitting up at the top of their Division, Fulham are planted at the bottom. Therefore, my prediction was based on many factors
I will concede that it is highly likely Fulham will win, it may be a win by the slightest margin.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
So it would seem that Croydon has forfeited their match with West Adelaide. Jaguars Reserves forfeited against City as well. 
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Uni 11-0 strikers
Fulham 5-0 Campbelltown
Cumby 5- 1PHK
Inter 7- 1 United
WA 3- Croydon 0 (forfeit)
City 23-0 Jaguars
Fulham 5-0 Campbelltown
Cumby 5- 1PHK
Inter 7- 1 United
WA 3- Croydon 0 (forfeit)
City 23-0 Jaguars
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:57 am
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Cup Round 1
WOW
Results all went the way of the Premier League teams.
Seriously though for the integrity of the competition, Jaguars cannot continue to draw a game against a prems side when results like that occur. Apart from the forfeit (that's another story in itself), the results were ok. Whilst commendable Jaguars didn't take the Croydon option and forfeit, 23-0 isn't good for them, City or the competition.
Will be interesting to see the pairings for the next round.
Results all went the way of the Premier League teams.
Seriously though for the integrity of the competition, Jaguars cannot continue to draw a game against a prems side when results like that occur. Apart from the forfeit (that's another story in itself), the results were ok. Whilst commendable Jaguars didn't take the Croydon option and forfeit, 23-0 isn't good for them, City or the competition.
Will be interesting to see the pairings for the next round.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Jaguars/City game wasn’t fun for anyone- A positive is that the Jaguars girls kept their heads up and worked hard the whole game. Their coach was unfailingly positive and supportive of the girls. The club is to be commended for such a strong show of character. Success will come for them if they continue that way.
-
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:46 pm
Re: Cup Round 1
What a dissappointing cup round.
The FFSA needs to act on those clubs that forfeited and fine them accordingly and ban them for next years cup round.
It shows disrespect to the womens cup competition.
The FFSA needs to act on those clubs that forfeited and fine them accordingly and ban them for next years cup round.
It shows disrespect to the womens cup competition.
Re: Cup Round 1
Not too difficult to fix this. Don't fine anyone, just have seeding in the competition so the stronger sides join later. Getting beaten by a big score doesn't help anyone, neither does forfeiting.
The oldest Cup competition in the world (FA Cup) starts in August but the Premier League sides don't take part until the following January.......
The oldest Cup competition in the world (FA Cup) starts in August but the Premier League sides don't take part until the following January.......
Re: Cup Round 1
Both are equally "terrible"!Bomber wrote:Lose 20+ nil - terrible - OR
Forfeit - terrible
Make up your minds.
This to me just highlight's the massive problem with State League. All SL teams should be relishing the opportunity to test themselves against WNPL (inc res) teams to benchmark their ability's and determine area in their game that needs improving to help them achieve WNPL promotion. The fact SL teams forfeited games against WNPL teams because "they didn't want to get battered" shows they should be in the community league.
I have a lot of respect for Jags who knew it was going to be a one sided game but still turned up (compared to other teams in their comp) however the gap in ability between SL and WNPL should not be that big to warrant that kind of score.
The FFSA really need to start to stop pretending that it is good for the game and development to have what should be Community Div teams in SL and turn it back into a high quality competition, reflecting the second highest tier in South Australian Women's Football.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60561
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Cup Round 1
The FFSA are encouraging all NPL teams to field women's teams. All well and good, but the talent is too thin, clearly.Rascal21 wrote:Both are equally "terrible"!Bomber wrote:Lose 20+ nil - terrible - OR
Forfeit - terrible
Make up your minds.
This to me just highlight's the massive problem with State League. All SL teams should be relishing the opportunity to test themselves against WNPL (inc res) teams to benchmark their ability's and determine area in their game that needs improving to help them achieve WNPL promotion. The fact SL teams forfeited games against WNPL teams because "they didn't want to get battered" shows they should be in the community league.
I have a lot of respect for Jags who knew it was going to be a one sided game but still turned up (compared to other teams in their comp) however the gap in ability between SL and WNPL should not be that big to warrant that kind of score.
The FFSA really need to start to stop pretending that it is good for the game and development to have what should be Community Div teams in SL and turn it back into a high quality competition, reflecting the second highest tier in South Australian Women's Football.
Expectations might just be too high at present. Over time, this will probably change for the better, especially if the Matildas continue to shine on the world stage.
Given the gaps, maybe the cup comp needs to have some play-offs first (lower leagues) and then introduce the PL teams later.
Ignore this signature
Re: Cup Round 1
Brilliant discussions about the Cup and how its should happen in the future so that we can try and avoid blowouts and forfeits.
You ought to put that forward to the FFSA.
On another note, the depth of talent is a issue that needs to be addressed. I get the NTC competition and how its producing top notch players for the league however, this is top end talent that's destined for the WNPL and not SL. Unless of course the downward pressure by the NTC may see some WNPL players pushed out of their respective WNPL teams disperse into the SL.
Work needs to happen in S clubs s is happening in the WNPL. The good performing teams are establishing strong off field structures to develop players. Those that are behind the ball like Fulham will quickly fall away. The SL may be resultant to do so and we then get we get the situation like Campbelltown that quickly exists the WNPL without striking a blow. NTC is a different beast and will stay in the WNPL Because of many factors including strong off field and developmental programs. SL clubs need to take responsibility to ready themselves for a strike at the WNPL promotion opportunity.
You ought to put that forward to the FFSA.
On another note, the depth of talent is a issue that needs to be addressed. I get the NTC competition and how its producing top notch players for the league however, this is top end talent that's destined for the WNPL and not SL. Unless of course the downward pressure by the NTC may see some WNPL players pushed out of their respective WNPL teams disperse into the SL.
Work needs to happen in S clubs s is happening in the WNPL. The good performing teams are establishing strong off field structures to develop players. Those that are behind the ball like Fulham will quickly fall away. The SL may be resultant to do so and we then get we get the situation like Campbelltown that quickly exists the WNPL without striking a blow. NTC is a different beast and will stay in the WNPL Because of many factors including strong off field and developmental programs. SL clubs need to take responsibility to ready themselves for a strike at the WNPL promotion opportunity.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 15214
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:58 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Cup Round 1
juniorsupporter wrote:So it would seem that Croydon has forfeited their match with West Adelaide. Jaguars Reserves forfeited against City as well.
As did Western Strikers reserves V Uni
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:57 am
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Oh really? Positive? Grin and bear it maybe. Cup comp needs a revamp in line with what's been discussed herein
juniorsupporter wrote:Jaguars/City game wasn’t fun for anyone- A positive is that the Jaguars girls kept their heads up and worked hard the whole game. Their coach was unfailingly positive and supportive of the girls. The club is to be commended for such a strong show of character. Success will come for them if they continue that way.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Cup Round 1
Sorry Billy- I saw their effort and comportment as something worthy of a positive mention. As I said, it wasn’t particularly enjoyable for any of the players on either side. Yes, Jaguars did ‘grin and bear it’. My point was they did so with class and made the best of it. Were you there?
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 8:57 am
- Been thanked: 13 times