I have attacked people for making comments about my family and been "punished' for doing so. As i have said before, warner has a reputation for crossing the line. It seems this time he got some back and didn't like it. Maybe it will teach him a lesson in the future.Wayne Kerr wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:2 stories I've heard about it are great.
[warner can say what he likes about someone's mum and sister but mention his cum guzzling wife and he has a cry
The other I've heard is that midget was taking the piss out out his surname and quentin replied:
If you're going to worry about any grenache's it should probably be Sonny Bill's.
Whatever was said is not the issue, either true or not; but if the remark was about Warner's wife/daughter well then that's not-on.
I bet you would stand up for your daughter if someone said something degrading about her???
end of the day, Sledging on the field has been going on for ages, but personally attacking someone else's wife/daughter is just pathetic and spineless.
Aus v Sth Africa
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
God is an Englishman wrote:I have attacked people for making comments about my family and been "punished' for doing so. As i have said before, warner has a reputation for crossing the line. It seems this time he got some back and didn't like it. Maybe it will teach him a lesson in the future.Wayne Kerr wrote:
Whatever was said is not the issue, either true or not; but if the remark was about Warner's wife/daughter well then that's not-on.
I bet you would stand up for your daughter if someone said something degrading about her???
end of the day, Sledging on the field has been going on for ages, but personally attacking someone else's wife/daughter is just pathetic and spineless.
2 wrongs don't make a right
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
After the vicious assault on Steve smith as he left the field, one can only hope for a lengthy ban for the serial offender
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:16 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
predator wrote:After the vicious assault on Steve smith as he left the field, one can only hope for a lengthy ban for the serial offender
Hahaha - Smith won't get a ban at all.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Warner accused of ball tampering now as well. They've moved on from the sugar in their pockets.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Do I detect some residual tears from the ashes, or is it just that South Africa is such a great breeding ground for english cricketers there is so much love for them?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Just pointing out what's been reported. Warner's had enough tears for all of us.Bomber wrote:Do I detect some residual tears from the ashes, or is it just that South Africa is such a great breeding ground for english cricketers there is so much love for them?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Yet Rabada gets two games for continuous breaches - but hey, its only Aussies who do wrong.God is an Englishman wrote:Marsh now swearing at someone for getting him out.
Saffers are the worst offenders when it comes to "on field behaviour" issues - but as I said, I can see why poms don't throw anything at them as they may end up shooting one of their own.
Ignore this signature
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Bomber wrote:Yet Rabada gets two games for continuous breaches - but hey, its only Aussies who do wrong.God is an Englishman wrote:Marsh now swearing at someone for getting him out.
Saffers are the worst offenders when it comes to "on field behaviour" issues - but as I said, I can see why poms don't throw anything at them as they may end up shooting one of their own.
That's a joke, seriously!
2 game ban!!
South Africa have lost their most potent bowler for next 2 games.
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Bomber wrote:Yet Rabada gets two games for continuous breaches - but hey, its only Aussies who do wrong.God is an Englishman wrote:Marsh now swearing at someone for getting him out.
Saffers are the worst offenders when it comes to "on field behaviour" issues - but as I said, I can see why poms don't throw anything at them as they may end up shooting one of their own.
What did Rabada do wrong? Yes, he waa a bit over the top with his celebration but that's it.
So Rabada v warner/lyon and marsh..it's not just the aussies but that's 3-1 and all 3 worse than the 1. Actually, 3-2 I forgot tbat de Kock was also charged. 2 minor south african issues.
Australia seem to be the common denominator but you just can't see that.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:17 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Smith said before hand they were going to target Rabada to get him banned, looks he won. With one of the most exiting players of the series rubbed out not sure if the game of test cricket is the winner though
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
So who were Saffers playing against when they received their prior sanctions? They had seven before this series, vs Australia 3.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Yet Rabada gets two games for continuous breaches - but hey, its only Aussies who do wrong.God is an Englishman wrote:Marsh now swearing at someone for getting him out.
Saffers are the worst offenders when it comes to "on field behaviour" issues - but as I said, I can see why poms don't throw anything at them as they may end up shooting one of their own.
What did Rabada do wrong? Yes, he waa a bit over the top with his celebration but that's it.
So Rabada v warner/lyon and marsh..it's not just the aussies but that's 3-1 and all 3 worse than the 1. Actually, 3-2 I forgot tbat de Kock was also charged. 2 minor south african issues.
Australia seem to be the common denominator but you just can't see that.
End of, they can be a pig-headed bunch and certainly are no angels when it comes to chatter and antics.
The only thing common here is poms whingeing again, even in a series that they're not involved in.
PS - I don't think Rabada should have been suspended BUT he was treading on eggshells from priors - but let's forget that shall we?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
I know one of Rabada's was against England.Bomber wrote:So who were Saffers playing against when they received their prior sanctions? They had seven before this series, vs Australia 3.
End of, they can be a pig-headed bunch and certainly are no angels when it comes to chatter and antics.
The only thing common here is poms whingeing again, even in a series that they're not involved in.
PS - I don't think Rabada should have been suspended BUT he was treading on eggshells from priors - but let's forget that shall we?
Look at the 5 people charged with anything in this series. The 3 open and shut cases are the aussies. The 2 SA ones are negligible. Someone may have said something, someone celebrated taking a wicket.
Not whingeing, stating facts and discussion points from the series.
Rabada's not a good look and (as you said) was treading on egg shells.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
I understand that the game is getting out of hand with the supposed "psychological" battles, and it's wearing a bit thin. What once was banter, humour and go for a drink after the day's play (or match) seems to be a thing of the past.
I agree with Michael Holding and may have mentioned it earlier somewhere - give the umps yellow and red cards - the yellow is first warning and another one will mean a red and off for the rest of the game (no bat, no bowl, no field) thus playing one short. Serious infringement - straight red and much like football, depending on the offence suspended for next game/s.
It will stop quick smart and everyone can get on wit the game.
I also agree with Skull O'Keeffe - the over-celebrating of a wicket and sending off the batsman is ridiculous (all teams guilty at times) - a batsman cant be more out once he's out, so why bother?
The ICC needs to grow some balls and act - at least then there wont be any criticism of "where the lines are drawn" any more. Make some rules - advise all playing nations - adopt them and see how it goes. Currently its open slather - and remember India, NZ and Windies aren't exactly choir boys when it comes to all of this either.
I agree with Michael Holding and may have mentioned it earlier somewhere - give the umps yellow and red cards - the yellow is first warning and another one will mean a red and off for the rest of the game (no bat, no bowl, no field) thus playing one short. Serious infringement - straight red and much like football, depending on the offence suspended for next game/s.
It will stop quick smart and everyone can get on wit the game.
I also agree with Skull O'Keeffe - the over-celebrating of a wicket and sending off the batsman is ridiculous (all teams guilty at times) - a batsman cant be more out once he's out, so why bother?
The ICC needs to grow some balls and act - at least then there wont be any criticism of "where the lines are drawn" any more. Make some rules - advise all playing nations - adopt them and see how it goes. Currently its open slather - and remember India, NZ and Windies aren't exactly choir boys when it comes to all of this either.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
All countries do it, correct. However, if stories are true then the aussies have no idea where the line is amd then the first to complain that others have crossed the line.
Admittedly only rumours but Bairstow got some very personal and disgusting comments from Warner and then did it again to de Kock.
Who can forget the mcgrath v sarwan. When he went personal and then jumped up and down when it came back at him.
Admittedly only rumours but Bairstow got some very personal and disgusting comments from Warner and then did it again to de Kock.
Who can forget the mcgrath v sarwan. When he went personal and then jumped up and down when it came back at him.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
So it will always be he said/she said until they come up with an alternative solution. I don't care too much about some words on the pitch, but lately it seems the old "colour of your seat covers" isn't enough and people are testing the boundaries by, in their eyes, pushing the envelope.God is an Englishman wrote:All countries do it, correct. However, if stories are true then the aussies have no idea where the line is amd then the first to complain that others have crossed the line.
Admittedly only rumours but Bairstow got some very personal and disgusting comments from Warner and then did it again to de Kock.
Who can forget the mcgrath v sarwan. When he went personal and then jumped up and down when it came back at him.
The more I ever got sledged, the more I was determined to play better, ie it didn't put me off my game (as negligible a player I was) - maybe that's why I don't see the big deal. Clearly others do and are deeply offended by some words.
Ignore this signature
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:16 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:40 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Seriously???God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Yet Rabada gets two games for continuous breaches - but hey, its only Aussies who do wrong.God is an Englishman wrote:Marsh now swearing at someone for getting him out.
Saffers are the worst offenders when it comes to "on field behaviour" issues - but as I said, I can see why poms don't throw anything at them as they may end up shooting one of their own.
What did Rabada do wrong? Yes, he waa a bit over the top with his celebration but that's it.
So Rabada v warner/lyon and marsh..it's not just the aussies but that's 3-1 and all 3 worse than the 1. Actually, 3-2 I forgot tbat de Kock was also charged. 2 minor south african issues.
Australia seem to be the common denominator but you just can't see that.
That's one of the dumbest things I have read on here (normally you are sharper than that).
In a series between two countries that has been highly aggressive, you are suggesting that Australia is the common denominator in a confrontation between the two sides.
It's all in the Delivery!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
No I am suggesting that there's been a number of confrontations in reccent test series.
australia v india
australia v England
australia v south africa
Can you see the common denominator?
Australia becoming like liverpool - it's never their fault.
australia v india
australia v England
australia v south africa
Can you see the common denominator?
Australia becoming like liverpool - it's never their fault.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:40 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
God is an Englishman wrote:No I am suggesting that there's been a number of confrontations in reccent test series.
australia v india
australia v England
australia v south africa
Can you see the common denominator?
Australia becoming like liverpool - it's never their fault.
You didn't say that though did you?
It's all in the Delivery!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Brian the Postman wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:No I am suggesting that there's been a number of confrontations in reccent test series.
australia v india
australia v England
australia v south africa
Can you see the common denominator?
Australia becoming like liverpool - it's never their fault.
You didn't say that though did you?
I also didn't say I was just talking about the one series, you just assumed.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:40 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Weaseling and deflecting again.God is an Englishman wrote:Brian the Postman wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:No I am suggesting that there's been a number of confrontations in reccent test series.
australia v india
australia v England
australia v south africa
Can you see the common denominator?
Australia becoming like liverpool - it's never their fault.
You didn't say that though did you?
I also didn't say I was just talking about the one series, you just assumed.
It's all in the Delivery!
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
TomorrowMápó Tòfu wrote:When does the third test start?
It will be either very spicy OR everyone will be pretty quiet.
I predict the former, seeing the ICC don't seem to care much about on field antics (in reality)
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
So, I give you a basic fact and I'm deflecting and weaslingBrian the Postman wrote:
Weaseling and deflecting again.
Seems to me that you know I'm right but just can't admit it. Don't worry, I've beaten better than you.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Kids believe in Easter Bunny too, you know, in their minds.....God is an Englishman wrote:So, I give you a basic fact and I'm deflecting and weaslingBrian the Postman wrote:
Weaseling and deflecting again.
Seems to me that you know I'm right but just can't admit it. Don't worry, I've beaten better than you.
Ignore this signature