Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
Woof, woof, woof..Asahara Shōkō wrote:I asked that years ago. If you use the search function the answer is there.God is an Englishman wrote:Been meaning to ask - why do you put the scores in brackets?
OK time to show you up AGAIN!! Does it not get boring for you?Old Master wrote:You are obsessed with Hoddle, who by the way, was a decent player but a total cretin as a manager of England (can't blame him too much though as the poor chap was a Southerner), I have never seen him as anything else, but you choose to lie every time you lodge a post by describing him as my 'hero'.
Just another example of your lying and fabrication of facts.
The objects 'thrown on to the pitch' were Tennis balls, not the sharpened coins Millwall supporters are prone to using.
The pitch was not 'invaded' it was taken over during the half time break by supporters walking onto the field and sitting down until the security staff started getting rough with them, but there was no violence, just gentle resistance.
I don't defend Leeds because there is no need to, they are no worse, or better than many other clubs supporters, such as Millwall & Watford, and, as you cannot accept that they do any wrong why should I?
For me the brackets would always represent the half time score with the outside the brackets the full time score.swannsong wrote:Woof, woof, woof..Asahara Shōkō wrote:I asked that years ago. If you use the search function the answer is there.God is an Englishman wrote:Been meaning to ask - why do you put the scores in brackets?
Can't remember what my answer was.....just something I have done for many years, a stylistic way of presenting-hilighting information that I have maintained....in a nutshell (metaphorically speaking) I like it
I always thought the numbers in brackets was the half time score.swannsong wrote:Woof, woof, woof..Asahara Shōkō wrote:I asked that years ago. If you use the search function the answer is there.God is an Englishman wrote:Been meaning to ask - why do you put the scores in brackets?
Can't remember what my answer was.....just something I have done for many years, a stylistic way of presenting-hilighting information that I have maintained....in a nutshell (metaphorically speaking) I like it
Even when there is only one set of numbers ?ozzie owl wrote: I always thought the numbers in brackets was the half time score.
It would probably kill him to know he's just agreed with meozzie owl wrote:I always thought the numbers in brackets was the half time score.
I don't keep a dog.God is an Englishman wrote:You don't keep a dog and bark yourselfAsahara Shōkō wrote:I asked that years ago. If you use the search function the answer is there.God is an Englishman wrote:Been meaning to ask - why do you put the scores in brackets?
Then get barkingAsahara Shōkō wrote: I don't keep a dog.
swannsong wrote:Even when there is only one set of numbers ?ozzie owl wrote: I always thought the numbers in brackets was the half time score.
Only been asked why I format things this way twice in nearly ten years on the forum.
Heaven forbid I should ever list the away team first
I can't remember what reason you gave either?swannsong wrote:Woof, woof, woof..Asahara Shōkō wrote:I asked that years ago. If you use the search function the answer is there.God is an Englishman wrote:Been meaning to ask - why do you put the scores in brackets?
Can't remember what my answer was.....just something I have done for many years, a stylistic way of presenting-hilighting information that I have maintained....in a nutshell (metaphorically speaking) I like it
Since I know how concerned you are about the use of the English language, I should correct you here. They're not brackets, they're parentheses.God is an Englishman wrote:Been meaning to ask - why do you put the scores in brackets?
Oxford Dictionaries seems to disagree with youNice One Cyril wrote:Since I know how concerned you are about the use of the English language, I should correct you here. They're not brackets, they're parentheses.
Brackets are [ and ].
No need to thank me
We have been pretty average so far, Leeds up by 1-0 at half time .swannsong wrote:Barnsley v Huddersfield Town and Leeds United v Sheffield Wednesday....Yorkshire derby double tonight....
God is an Englishman wrote:Old Master has gone missing AGAIN
Your inability to back up that statement is duly noted.Old Master wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Old Master has gone missing AGAIN
I am not missing, just taking a break from reading your drivel and inability to recognise what is a lie and just how many you have posted.
Leeds were a bit lucky to get a win in this game - a draw would have been a fairer result. The penalty save and some solid second half defending definitely helped. 35K and the atmosphere sounded good on TV. Interesting Monk didn't play the new signings this game and Leeds won. I can not see the teams in the 3rd to 6th positions dropping out of the top 6 so its all going to come down to the play off games. Happy Days :wink:ozzie owl wrote:We have been pretty average so far, Leeds up by 1-0 at half time .swannsong wrote:Barnsley v Huddersfield Town and Leeds United v Sheffield Wednesday....Yorkshire derby double tonight....
Another missed penalty , didn't help our cause.
From what I saw that, Monk was the one who instigated the physical contact, then bottled it.Mr Red wrote:Well the other guy got 2 games and he was the one that left his technical area ran past the Leeds bench celebrating his head off. Then returned past the Leeds bench probably heard Monk have a few nice words to say about showing a bit of respect maybe LOL and then the German guy entered the Leeds technical area to discuss the time of day. So Monk got half what the German guy got because he did 2 things wrong and Monk did 1 :wink: . Well that's how I read it.
God is an Englishman wrote:From what I saw that, Monk was the one who instigated the physical contact, then bottled it.Mr Red wrote:Well the other guy got 2 games and he was the one that left his technical area ran past the Leeds bench celebrating his head off. Then returned past the Leeds bench probably heard Monk have a few nice words to say about showing a bit of respect maybe LOL and then the German guy entered the Leeds technical area to discuss the time of day. So Monk got half what the German guy got because he did 2 things wrong and Monk did 1 :wink: . Well that's how I read it.
Disagree there, Monk moved across to block him and that's why he got in his face.Mr Red wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:From what I saw that, Monk was the one who instigated the physical contact, then bottled it.Mr Red wrote:Well the other guy got 2 games and he was the one that left his technical area ran past the Leeds bench celebrating his head off. Then returned past the Leeds bench probably heard Monk have a few nice words to say about showing a bit of respect maybe LOL and then the German guy entered the Leeds technical area to discuss the time of day. So Monk got half what the German guy got because he did 2 things wrong and Monk did 1 :wink: . Well that's how I read it.
Yep Monk probably did push first when the German guy enter the Leeds area and got into Monks face. and then it was on for young and old
Agree with that partMr Red wrote:Very hard to tell because the side line was very close to technical area and I thought the coaches coming together happened in the tech area. In the end if he didnt leave his tech area in the first place and act the way he did right in front of the Leeds bench then it wouldn't have blown up the way it did.
Wagner left his own technical area...correct....Mr Red wrote:Very hard to tell because the side line was very close to technical area and I thought the coaches coming together happened in the tech area. In the end if he didnt leave his tech area in the first place and act the way he did right in front of the Leeds bench then it wouldn't have blown up the way it did.
