World Cup Expansion Proposal
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60532
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: World Cup Expansion Proposal
Can't see too many countries that could cope logistically with 48 teams apart from some who have hosted before (USA, England, Spain, Germany, Italy, France spring to mind), so will this mean more "co-hosting"? Can't see Australia ever hosting alone ever under this format for a start.
FIFA's greed is becoming way too prevalent, and this is after Blatter being ousted, so god knows how the game will look like in 20-30 years time.
FIFA's greed is becoming way too prevalent, and this is after Blatter being ousted, so god knows how the game will look like in 20-30 years time.
Ignore this signature
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:09 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 79 times
Re: World Cup Expansion Proposal
Agreed. The world (not just sport/football etc.) is run by greed all over. Who knows, by 2050 there may well be even more participants and by then Scotland may just qualify by the skin of their teeth! Will be interesting to see how it all unfolds but I'm still against it in principle. The format today favours the strong Nations (rightly or wrongly) with the seeding process and I believe they will get more favours when 2026 comes around. The so called big guns will be kept apart for longer and in theory these teams should 'stay around' longer. Maybe England might even get to the next stage.Bomber wrote:Can't see too many countries that could cope logistically with 48 teams apart from some who have hosted before (USA, England, Spain, Germany, Italy, France spring to mind), so will this mean more "co-hosting"? Can't see Australia ever hosting alone ever under this format for a start.
FIFA's greed is becoming way too prevalent, and this is after Blatter being ousted, so god knows how the game will look like in 20-30 years time.
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 7560
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:03 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Re: World Cup Expansion Proposal
I thin they've made this decision to ensure that China will be able to qualify for the WC at last.
And Scotland ........
And Scotland ........
The older I get the better I was.
FOOTBALL IS LIFE
The Rest Is Just Details
FOOTBALL IS LIFE
The Rest Is Just Details
- Inoue Waka
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:54 pm
Re: World Cup Expansion Proposal
You make it sound like they never have.Old Master wrote:I thin they've made this decision to ensure that China will be able to qualify for the WC at last.
- Sappers Road
- Apprentice
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:06 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22047
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Re: World Cup Expansion Proposal
Rumour is that FIFA will use a penalty shoot out if necessary to decide positions. Imagine a three way shoot out, what a joke.N5 1BH wrote:On that note. In a 3 team group, if each team wins 3–0 (or more likely 1-0). Who goes through?B.Toomer wrote:3-0; 3-0; 3-0. Just for you Scotty!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: World Cup Expansion Proposal
Normally, that situation would be the drawing of lots. A penalty shoot out isn't fair as 10 of the players have just played 90 minutes of football and the others are fresh. Arguments both ways as to who gets the advantage there though. Also, which GK for which team?ozzie owl wrote:Rumour is that FIFA will use a penalty shoot out if necessary to decide positions. Imagine a three way shoot out, what a joke.N5 1BH wrote:On that note. In a 3 team group, if each team wins 3–0 (or more likely 1-0). Who goes through?B.Toomer wrote:3-0; 3-0; 3-0. Just for you Scotty!