Australia v New Zealand
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- Sappers Road
- Apprentice
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:06 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Australia v New Zealand
I'm not a fan of the review system (even though today they got it right). If the umpire gives you out suck it up and walk.
- Sappers Road
- Apprentice
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:06 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Sappers Road
- Apprentice
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:06 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Sappers Road wrote:What differentiates a stumping from a run out?
It's a run out if they are or were attempting to take a run
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
and yes you can be run out off a no ball/free hit otherwise you'd be able to continue running all day
- God Tongue
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:47 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I am pretty sure on sunday there was a run out where they weren't attempting to take a run.
English is weird. It can be understood through tough thorough thought, though.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
The only run out I can see is Mitchell Marsh. Marsh was backing up at the bowlers end and too far out of his ground. By backing up that far, he would be deemed to have been attempting a run as he was out of his ground to gain an advantage in taking the run.God Tongue wrote:I am pretty sure on sunday there was a run out where they weren't attempting to take a run.
- God Tongue
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:47 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I don't think he was attempting a run.
English is weird. It can be understood through tough thorough thought, though.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I haven't seen it but look at cric info's description he was backing up out of his crease at the bowlers end. That's attempting a run, otherwise he would be in his crease.God Tongue wrote:I don't think he was attempting a run.
- Sappers Road
- Apprentice
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:06 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Allow them to run until the wicket keeper has the ball in his hands.God is an Englishman wrote:and yes you can be run out off a no ball/free hit otherwise you'd be able to continue running all day
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Why the wicket keeper? You can be run out at both ends. Plus, this would mean that you could start a run all the time until the ball is in his hand.Sappers Road wrote:Allow them to run until the wicket keeper has the ball in his hands.God is an Englishman wrote:and yes you can be run out off a no ball/free hit otherwise you'd be able to continue running all day
- Vernon Howell
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:07 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Don't give away free hits.God is an Englishman wrote:Why the wicket keeper? You can be run out at both ends. Plus, this would mean that you could start a run all the time until the ball is in his hand.Sappers Road wrote:Allow them to run until the wicket keeper has the ball in his hands.God is an Englishman wrote:and yes you can be run out off a no ball/free hit otherwise you'd be able to continue running all day
As close to jesus as you're likely to get