Aus v Sth Africa
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
It's their bowling attack which will cause you the problems. Interesting to see if a normal waca deck has been produced.
- Vernon Howell
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:07 am
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
So this is who is playing. The telecast started just as I was leaving the depot.
As close to jesus as you're likely to get
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.Mr Red wrote: I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it.God is an Englishman wrote:Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.Mr Red wrote: I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced
4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.Bomber wrote:That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it.God is an Englishman wrote:Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.Mr Red wrote: I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced
4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- Sawajiri Erika
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:55 am
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.Bomber wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.
Ever heard the term "When in Rome............"
- Pooraka Sałt
- Apprentice
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:22 pm
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
105/0 should give you some idea.Bomber wrote:69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Back by popular demand
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?God is an Englishman wrote:Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.Bomber wrote:That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it.God is an Englishman wrote: Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.
4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Pooraka Sałt wrote:105/0 should give you some idea.Bomber wrote:69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Warner treating it like a 50 over game.
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
God is an Englishman wrote:I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.Bomber wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.
Ever heard the term "When in Rome............"
As if you'd know, being held in a cell isn't travelling in rome
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
- Vernon Howell
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:07 am
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
No, I have never driven a car in mainland EuropeSlinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No law relates to the scoreboard
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Only just seen it, have answered.Bomber wrote:You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60529
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here)God is an Englishman wrote:No, I have never driven a car in mainland EuropeSlinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No law relates to the scoreboard
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
How would that make me feel silly? You can't get 105 wickets in an innings.Bomber wrote:Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here)God is an Englishman wrote:No, I have never driven a car in mainland EuropeSlinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No law relates to the scoreboard
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
You have above, you said 0 runs for 105 wicketsBomber wrote:No-one is claiming anyone has (taken 105 wickets). Simples