I am Australian though. By law and first generation. They do call this the lucky country too. I'm privileged.God is an Englishman wrote:
I agree, I would consider being told I wasn't Australian as a compliment as well.
ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Moderators: Randoman, BillShankly, arxidi, Forum Admins
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60534
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIAqq
"Australia is a lucky country run mainly by second rate people who share its luck. It lives on other people's ideas, and, although its ordinary people are adaptable, most of its leaders (in all fields) so lack curiosity about the events that surround them that they are often taken by surprise."God is an Englishman wrote:Who calls it the lucky country?
I'd rather be Great than lucky
- Ioseb Jughashvili
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 9:17 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Hard labor in Siberia for you.Stuckey wrote:It's like saying that a convicted car thief isn't that bad a person because they aren't as bad as Stalin.
იოსებ ბესარიონის ძე ჯუღაშვილი
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
If you read my original post I laughed that Australia's most capped player apparently doesn't have an affinity for Australia. If he had no affinity he wouldn't of played for Australia a record amount of times. So not only were you being entirely presumptuous about Grosso's comment you were totally wrong about mine as well.God is an Englishman wrote:You assumed it wasn't when you made the comment laughing at Grossi for saying he has no affinity with Australia.
With your assumption he's wrong, with mine he's right. Therefore, my assumption makes sense.
But also as said we haven't heard from Schwarzer on this so we don't know for sure what he's level of affinity actually is. So on that fact you and he are assuming knowledge on that.
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
The term lucky country isn't actually a compliment. Its a reference to the fact Australia has all this space and natural resource to earn income off where as "less lucky" countries must make the most of the resources they have. It basically means that Australia has no excuse not to be prosperous.Bomber wrote:I am Australian though. By law and first generation. They do call this the lucky country too. I'm privileged.God is an Englishman wrote:
I agree, I would consider being told I wasn't Australian as a compliment as well.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60534
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIAqq
Don't give up your day job.magnet wrote:"Australia is a lucky country run mainly by second rate people who share its luck. It lives on other people's ideas, and, although its ordinary people are adaptable, most of its leaders (in all fields) so lack curiosity about the events that surround them that they are often taken by surprise."God is an Englishman wrote:Who calls it the lucky country?
I'd rather be Great than lucky
If you're so "great" mr giae, and yet your stuck here, isn't that a bit of an oxymoron then? "Great" people by and large don't fuck up.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIAqq
I said the country was great, not that I was.Bomber wrote:Don't give up your day job.magnet wrote:"Australia is a lucky country run mainly by second rate people who share its luck. It lives on other people's ideas, and, although its ordinary people are adaptable, most of its leaders (in all fields) so lack curiosity about the events that surround them that they are often taken by surprise."God is an Englishman wrote:Who calls it the lucky country?
I'd rather be Great than lucky
If you're so "great" mr giae, and yet your stuck here, isn't that a bit of an oxymoron then? "Great" people by and large don't shiraz up.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Bomber wrote:Just an opinion, hardly fact.
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Maybe you should live in GREATER Manchester.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Just an opinion, hardly fact.
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22048
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Amazing that Grosso & Co can read Schwarzer's mind, what's next, this weeks winning X Lotto numbers?Stuckey wrote:If you read my original post I laughed that Australia's most capped player apparently doesn't have an affinity for Australia. If he had no affinity he wouldn't of played for Australia a record amount of times. So not only were you being entirely presumptuous about Grosso's comment you were totally wrong about mine as well.God is an Englishman wrote:You assumed it wasn't when you made the comment laughing at Grossi for saying he has no affinity with Australia.
With your assumption he's wrong, with mine he's right. Therefore, my assumption makes sense.
But also as said we haven't heard from Schwarzer on this so we don't know for sure what he's level of affinity actually is. So on that fact you and he are assuming knowledge on that.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60534
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
What's so great about either? I had a great-grandfather once. Was he special?Slinky_Pete wrote:Maybe you should live in GREATER Manchester.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Just an opinion, hardly fact.
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
Ignore this signature
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Does it really count if they gave themselves the name though?God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Just an opinion, hardly fact.
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
Also is Great a reference to it's size and not how good it is?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Why do "& Co" need to read his mind?ozzie owl wrote:Amazing that Grosso & Co can read Schwarzer's mind, what's next, this weeks winning X Lotto numbers?Stuckey wrote:If you read my original post I laughed that Australia's most capped player apparently doesn't have an affinity for Australia. If he had no affinity he wouldn't of played for Australia a record amount of times. So not only were you being entirely presumptuous about Grosso's comment you were totally wrong about mine as well.God is an Englishman wrote:You assumed it wasn't when you made the comment laughing at Grossi for saying he has no affinity with Australia.
With your assumption he's wrong, with mine he's right. Therefore, my assumption makes sense.
But also as said we haven't heard from Schwarzer on this so we don't know for sure what he's level of affinity actually is. So on that fact you and he are assuming knowledge on that.
I'm sure this will be added to the list of this blokes unanswered questions. Always goes missing when he's wrong.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22048
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
It is reference to its size.Stuckey wrote:Does it really count if they gave themselves the name though?God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Just an opinion, hardly fact.
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
Also is Great a reference to it's size and not how good it is?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
A small island would be called Great because of of its size. Hardly makes sense.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
So - who called Australia the "lucky" country then?Stuckey wrote:Does it really count if they gave themselves the name though?God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Just an opinion, hardly fact.
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
Also is Great a reference to it's size and not how good it is?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60534
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Great Barrier Reef, an example of size, more so than anything else one would think.God is an Englishman wrote:A small island would be called Great because of of its size. Hardly makes sense.
Ignore this signature
-
- Coach
- Posts: 22048
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Bomber wrote:Great Barrier Reef, an example of size, more so than anything else one would think.God is an Englishman wrote:A small island would be called Great because of of its size. Hardly makes sense.
After the Anglo-Saxon period, Britain was used as a historical term only. Geoffrey of Monmouth in his pseudohistorical Historia Regum Britanniae (c. 1136) refers to the island of Great Britain as Britannia major ("Greater Britain"), to distinguish it from Britannia minor ("Lesser Britain"), the continental region which approximates to modern Brittany, which had been settled in the fifth and sixth centuries by Celtic immigrants from the British Isles.[38] The term Great Britain was first used officially in 1474, in the instrument drawing up the proposal for a marriage between Cecily the daughter of Edward IV of England, and James the son of James III of Scotland, which described it as "this Nobill Isle, callit Gret Britanee". As noted above it was used again in 1604, when King James VI and I styled himself "King of Great Brittaine, France and Ireland".
- Baseball Bill
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:55 am
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
Maybe it was a comparison to it's neighbor Ireland.God is an Englishman wrote:A small island would be called Great because of of its size. Hardly makes sense.
Giving always takes its toll
Re: ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA
http://www.google.comGod is an Englishman wrote:So - who called Australia the "lucky" country then?Stuckey wrote:Does it really count if they gave themselves the name though?God is an Englishman wrote:
It's a fact, it's even in the name.
GREAT Britain
Also is Great a reference to it's size and not how good it is?
Find out for yourself mate.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times